156:. Only one squadron has a Knowledge (XXG) article, which I haven't nominated because it provides the claim that it is the first squadron in Canada, not just in its community. I didn't make this nomination because the article on the first Royal Canadian Sea Cadet Squadron in Canada was nominated for deletion, but was kept, because it was the first in Canada. Here is the discussion that resulted in that article being kept:
128:
that seems to have consensus, this is an individual chapter of a national organization that does not display its individual notability. The only sources on the page are links to its sponsor's page. It was listed as a proposed deletion. The proposed deletion tag was removed with the edit summary "I
240:
I would say they're more notable than a high school club, because they are co-sponsored by the
Canadian Department of National defence, supervised by the Canadian Forces, and often do contribute a lot to the community. In small communities, the only Canadian Forces presence is due to the officers
133:
squadrons in the country -- hundreds of them were the first to be formed in their community, and all have history of excellence. (Note to those that like to search Google for topics: you might have luck abbreviating Royal
Canadian Air Cadet Squadron to RCACS.)
90:
85:
94:
77:
129:
don't think this article should be deleted because, IT IS INDIVIDUALLY NOTABLE. This squadron was the first squadron to be formed in
Calgary and has a long history of excellence." Note that there are hundreds of
319:
per above, but mention the existence of the cadet squadron (1-2 lines, with a link to the article on the organisation) in the appropriate school article, if determined. While the
117:
157:
255:
That could likewise be said for many high school clubs, which likewise often contribute to their communities and are often sponsored by national organizations (
339:
327:
311:
293:
275:
250:
235:
219:
202:
186:
168:
143:
59:
231:
per nom. Yeah, whatever, there are similar cadet groups in high schools across the United States. They're about as notable as any other high school club.
323:
are notable in relation to Canada and its military, individual groups of cadets are not solely notable by being "an individual group of cadets" alone. --
81:
241:
supervising the
Canadian Cadet Organizations. However, I still think the individual sub-units are usually not notable for an encyclopedia.
73:
65:
17:
153:
354:
36:
320:
260:
130:
353:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
212:
54:
289:
246:
199:
195:
164:
139:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
125:
272:
232:
49:
179:
324:
308:
183:
285:
284:
other high school club, I thought you meant like, "Noname High School Chess club".
242:
216:
160:
135:
111:
336:
280:
Yes, okay, that would be correct. From the way that you said "notable as
256:
347:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
268:
198:, which is pretty hilarious for a quasi-military organization. -
264:
107:
103:
99:
194:
per Sancho. Although it looks like their motto is a
74:
52 City of
Calgary Royal Canadian Air Cadet Squadron
66:
52 City of
Calgary Royal Canadian Air Cadet Squadron
158:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/RCSCC_Victory
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
357:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
307:individual branches are not notable.
154:List of Air Cadet Squadrons in Canada
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
335:- no individual notability. --
1:
152:(from nominator): Here is a
374:
60:19:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
340:21:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
328:20:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
321:Royal Canadian Air Cadets
312:16:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
294:18:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
276:17:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
261:Future Farmers of America
251:16:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
236:15:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
220:14:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
203:18:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
187:17:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
169:16:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
144:15:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
131:Royal Canadian Air Cadets
350:Please do not modify it.
211:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
215:. It is listed now.
124:As per a portion of
196:Star Trek reference
365:
352:
115:
97:
34:
373:
372:
368:
367:
366:
364:
363:
362:
361:
355:deletion review
348:
88:
72:
69:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
371:
369:
360:
359:
343:
342:
330:
314:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
225:
224:
223:
222:
206:
205:
189:
172:
171:
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
370:
358:
356:
351:
345:
344:
341:
338:
334:
331:
329:
326:
322:
318:
315:
313:
310:
306:
303:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
277:
274:
271:and so on).
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
239:
238:
237:
234:
230:
227:
226:
221:
218:
214:
210:
209:
208:
207:
204:
201:
197:
193:
190:
188:
185:
181:
177:
174:
173:
170:
166:
162:
159:
155:
151:
148:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
132:
127:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
349:
346:
332:
316:
304:
281:
228:
200:Joshuapaquin
191:
180:non-notable.
175:
149:
123:
55:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
273:Ravenswing
233:Ravenswing
213:incomplete
51:Cbrown1023
325:saberwyn
309:Nuttah68
257:Key Club
184:GreenJoe
118:View log
217:DumbBOT
150:Comment
91:protect
86:history
333:Delete
317:Delete
305:Delete
286:Sancho
243:Sancho
229:Delete
192:Delete
176:Delete
161:Sancho
136:Sancho
126:WP:ORG
95:delete
46:Delete
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
337:Whpq
290:talk
269:DECA
247:talk
165:talk
140:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
282:any
265:4-H
116:– (
292:)
267:,
263:,
259:,
249:)
182:.
178:,
167:)
142:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
48:.
288:(
245:(
163:(
138:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.