291:: Currently there are no indications of why this sub-unit is notable. It is rare (but not a rule) that company-sized units receive the coverage required to make them notable by wikipedia standards. A Google search shows mainly wikipedia mirrors and as the article is not referenced there is no indication that such sources exist for this unit. The battalion that it belongs to (but which is currently redlinked itself) might be notable, thus information about this company could possibly be included in an article about the 192nd Ordnance Battalion (so long as sources exist for that unit). Having said this, I want to make clear I do not believe that all company-level units fail the notability test, as some will have the sources required to proved notability. A good example of this would be
295:. Indeed, some battalions will pass the test, while others will fail (notability needs to be determined on a case by case basis). If the creator or a subsequent contributor can find other sources (even paper sources, which can be accepted with good faith) that prove notability then I'd not be adverse to changing my vote, but as it stands I feel I must vote delete. —
160:
195:(under the heading '39th Military Police Company') seems to have decided that separate, non-combat companies that are not capable of independent combat action are not notable. Thus this sub-unit is being listed for deletion.
154:
88:
83:
92:
75:
121:
292:
231:
175:
142:
136:
304:
283:
264:
246:
204:
57:
242:
200:
132:
17:
182:
272:
The MilHist project is right about this---there is nothing significant to say about this one, and that will be the usual state
79:
71:
63:
148:
319:
36:
215:
300:
192:
318:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
216:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history/Archive_89#39th_Military_Police_Company***
296:
168:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
260:
53:
238:
196:
255:
No indications of notability, and searches of Google and Google News don't provide any.
279:
109:
256:
49:
274:
48:. Research and consensus indicates subunits are clearly not notable.
312:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116:
105:
101:
97:
167:
214:LATER NOTE: DISCUSSION ON 39 MP COY WAS LOCATED AT
181:
293:E Company, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
322:). No further edits should be made to this page.
232:list of Military-related deletion discussions
8:
226:
230:: This debate has been included in the
72:722nd Ordnance Company (United States)
64:722nd Ordnance Company (United States)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
58:06:16, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
305:22:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
284:21:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
265:07:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
247:01:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
205:01:14, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
339:
315:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
191:Recent discussion at
44:The result was
249:
235:
330:
317:
297:AustralianRupert
236:
186:
185:
171:
119:
113:
95:
34:
338:
337:
333:
332:
331:
329:
328:
327:
326:
320:deletion review
313:
128:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
336:
334:
325:
324:
308:
307:
286:
267:
250:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
189:
188:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
335:
323:
321:
316:
310:
309:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
287:
285:
281:
277:
276:
271:
268:
266:
262:
258:
254:
251:
248:
244:
240:
233:
229:
225:
224:
217:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
194:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
314:
311:
288:
273:
269:
252:
227:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
45:
43:
31:
28:
155:free images
239:Buckshot06
197:Buckshot06
193:WT:MILHIST
122:View log
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
289:Delete
270:Delete
257:Nick-D
253:Delete
133:Google
117:delete
93:delete
50:tedder
46:delete
280:talk
176:JSTOR
137:books
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
301:talk
261:talk
243:prof
228:Note
201:prof
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
275:DGG
183:TWL
303:)
282:)
263:)
245:)
234:.
203:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
299:(
278:(
259:(
241:(
237:—
199:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.