228:
articles, instead of one, even though the articles are of equal length, generally, and again add nothing new. After being asked repeatedly to stop creating duplicate articles like his "Xth
Congress - summary" forks, Afds on those forms have begun, and are now extended to these pre-existing forks, which by and large have already been merged into the main article. Out of some respect for the editor, they have not been speedy deleted, even though the probably qualify because the information is provided elsewhere. 'm not sure creating multiple AFDs is the answer, but I support that effort.
215:. Not sure if dispute resolution would work in this case. His response to the majority of questioning is to "wait and see what I'm doing, because I don't like they way the current article is written, and my way is better." Most of these articles have been merged into the main one, but the editor does not want that to happen. Rather than taking up the discussion at the main article or the project page, he continues to maintain these redundant articles. See his comment at
219:, where he blames other editors for the dispute, saying that he has resorted to creating new articles to "fix" some problem he sees with the changes to the main article, rather than trying to constructively work with us on a solution. He simply feels he owns the format, and doesn't want anyone reverting his edits, even though the current format was developed through consensus at
191:. Where is the main dispute being played out? Is there a central discussion? There is a whole category of article, so the decision on one will affect many or all of those articles. There are signs of ownership by Stilltim, but deletion doesn't seem the answer to this content dispute. Have you tried any form of dispute resolution before going to AfD? Why not
260:
I didn't begin the Afd effort, and don't really have the time or energy to go to RFC. I'll leave that to other editors to propose. It would have to be an RFC on the editors conduct, since an rRFC on content would get us nowhere. The editor is adamant that his way is the only proper way, and appears
227:
which use his preferred formating, which he views as the only proper format. These articles provide the same information, and add nothing new and distinct to
Knowledge that isn't already provided on the main article. He simply feels that all of this information should be provided in separate
261:
no longer open to discussions on other alternatives. I'm afraid he can't be convinced, since his comments to date indicate that only he has the expertise and knowlege to properly manage these articles, and other editors simply don't "understand" enough to do things the right (his) way.
377:
216:
91:
86:
245:
I believe it would be appropriate for you to create an RFC so that there is a more centralized discussion on this. More third party input on the situation may help convince him that this plan is inappropriate.
95:
78:
168:
A single article would work, but you are so insistent that your way is the only way, that our only solution left is to delete. You simply won't work with the rest of us to achieve consensus on a single
309:. A content dispute is no reason for forking. And someone should get on that RFC... hundreds of AfDs serve no purpose and don't seem to be discouraging the forking that this editor is engaged in. --
124:
397:
366:
346:
327:
289:
273:
255:
240:
204:
181:
158:
144:
60:
278:
82:
149:
The different nature of the content and its presentation results in the significant awkwardness/impossibility in having a single article.
74:
66:
393:
17:
335:
this & and all similar articles. Good summary articles for the key political changes of the period at a national level.
224:
200:
354:
132:
319:
412:
36:
411:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
196:
362:
140:
389:
265:
232:
212:
173:
154:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
358:
136:
47:
195:
the two tables into the main article, as they are in essence the entirety of the article.
381:
316:
285:
251:
342:
262:
229:
220:
170:
150:
53:
112:
311:
281:
247:
211:
Myself and other editors have had numerous queries with the editor on his
337:
378:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/46th United States
Congress - summary
217:
Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/37th_United_States_Congress_-_summary
223:. This all started when he began creating duplicate articles like
405:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
353:
Keep would be ok if the article wasn't the same as the
119:
108:
104:
100:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
415:). No further edits should be made to this page.
75:84th United States Congress - membership changes
67:84th United States Congress - membership changes
8:
135:. Should be included in the one article.
279:Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/Stilltim
225:50th United States Congress - summary
7:
357:article with some wording changes.--
24:
374:Speedy Delete G6 (Housekeeping)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
355:84th United States Congress
133:84th United States Congress
432:
408:Please do not modify it.
398:18:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
367:11:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
347:08:57, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
328:03:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
290:04:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
274:03:30, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
256:03:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
241:02:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
205:02:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
182:01:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
159:00:26, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
145:22:42, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
61:20:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
56:. Non-admin closure.
307:all similar articles
314:
197:Fences and windows
312:
423:
410:
385:
384:Dennis The Tiger
380:. So tagged. --
326:
271:
268:
238:
235:
179:
176:
122:
116:
98:
44:The result was
34:
431:
430:
426:
425:
424:
422:
421:
420:
419:
413:deletion review
406:
383:
324:
310:
269:
266:
236:
233:
177:
174:
118:
89:
73:
70:
46:speedy delete (
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
429:
427:
418:
417:
401:
400:
370:
369:
350:
349:
330:
320:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
208:
207:
185:
184:
129:
128:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
428:
416:
414:
409:
403:
402:
399:
395:
391:
387:
386:
379:
375:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
348:
344:
340:
339:
334:
331:
329:
325:
323:
317:
315:
308:
304:
301:
300:
291:
287:
283:
280:
277:
276:
275:
272:
264:
259:
258:
257:
253:
249:
244:
243:
242:
239:
231:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
187:
186:
183:
180:
172:
167:
163:
162:
161:
160:
156:
152:
147:
146:
142:
138:
134:
126:
121:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
407:
404:
382:
373:
336:
332:
321:
306:
302:
192:
188:
165:
148:
130:
45:
43:
31:
28:
359:gordonrox24
137:gordonrox24
305:this and
213:talk page
263:DCmacnut
230:DCmacnut
171:DCmacnut
169:article.
151:stilltim
131:Fork of
125:View log
58:MuZemike
376:as per
189:Comment
92:protect
87:history
303:Delete
221:WP:USC
166:Delete
120:delete
96:delete
394:stuff
270:: -->
237:: -->
193:merge
178:: -->
123:) – (
113:views
105:watch
101:links
54:R'n'B
16:<
392:and
390:Rawr
363:talk
343:talk
333:Keep
313:Kinu
286:talk
282:Gigs
267:<
252:talk
248:Gigs
234:<
201:talk
175:<
155:talk
141:talk
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
338:DGG
52:by
396:)
365:)
345:)
288:)
254:)
203:)
157:)
143:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
48:G6
388:(
361:(
341:(
322:c
318:/
284:(
250:(
199:(
164:'
153:(
139:(
127:)
117:(
115:)
77:(
50:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.