Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/911 controversy - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

110: 182:, and is controversial enough that we shouldn't give it the benefit of the doubt. Merge any useful content, delete the rest (unless sources are added). 214:; legitimate page on topic already exists, this version is completely unencyclopedic and little more than a POV essay. It's not sticking around. 83: 78: 87: 17: 70: 117:
No sources to back up statements... lacks neutrality... 9/11 conspiracy theories page already exists with relevant theories
281: 36: 191: 280:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
167: 147: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
184: 264: 235: 203: 158: 138: 121: 52: 74: 66: 58: 131: 250: 221: 118: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
209: 199: 175: 179: 171: 151: 135: 49: 155: 104: 134:. Advocacy page that belongs on an op-ed blog, not in an encyclopedia. 274:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
240:
In fact, I'm taking the initiative to redirect it myself.
100: 96: 92: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 284:). No further edits should be made to this page. 150:. This one reads like an essay and violates 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 242:Sysops: please just close this. 1: 301: 265:18:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 236:18:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 204:17:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 159:17:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 139:17:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 122:17:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 53:19:45, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 277:Please do not modify it. 170:. Current content fails 168:9/11 conspiracy theories 148:9/11 conspiracy theories 32:Please do not modify it. 164:Merge and redirect 201: 180:original research 292: 279: 263: 260: 257: 254: 248: 247: 234: 231: 228: 225: 219: 218: 202: 198: 196: 189: 108: 90: 34: 300: 299: 295: 294: 293: 291: 290: 289: 288: 282:deletion review 275: 258: 255: 252: 249: 245: 244: 229: 226: 223: 220: 216: 215: 192: 185: 183: 81: 67:911 controversy 65: 62: 59:911 controversy 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 298: 296: 287: 286: 270: 269: 268: 267: 206: 161: 141: 115: 114: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 297: 285: 283: 278: 272: 271: 266: 262: 261: 243: 239: 238: 237: 233: 232: 213: 211: 207: 205: 200: 197: 195: 190: 188: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 162: 160: 157: 153: 149: 145: 142: 140: 137: 133: 129: 126: 125: 124: 123: 120: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 276: 273: 251: 241: 222: 208: 193: 186: 163: 143: 127: 116: 45: 43: 31: 28: 178:, is clear 136:Ravenswing 132:WP:SOAPBOX 50:NawlinWiki 46:Redirected 130:per nom, 212:redirect 144:Redirect 111:View log 210:WP:SNOW 176:WP:NPOV 156:meshach 84:protect 79:history 172:WP:ATT 152:WP:NOR 128:Delete 88:delete 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 246:(|-- 217:(|-- 174:and 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 259:MuS 253:UlT 230:MuS 224:UlT 194:ton 187:Wal 166:to 146:to 109:– ( 154:. 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 256:i 227:i 119:D 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
NawlinWiki
19:45, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
911 controversy
911 controversy
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
D
17:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
WP:SOAPBOX
Ravenswing
17:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
9/11 conspiracy theories
WP:NOR
meshach
17:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
9/11 conspiracy theories
WP:ATT
WP:NPOV
original research
Wal

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.