116:
169:
Indeed. As far as I can see, none of the dozen or so sources confer any real notability on either the website or the term. The article as a whole is also pretty
17:
219:
The article is a mess, as suggested above, and I don't see that the existence of a website mandates a
Knowledge article.
83:
78:
260:
87:
36:
259:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
70:
241:
206:
156:
74:
245:
228:
208:
182:
162:
139:
52:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
224:
66:
58:
237:
178:
170:
135:
198:
150:
146:
127:
49:
104:
192:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
220:
123:
174:
131:
253:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
145:
So the article is for both a website and what appears to be a
126:
terminology. Does not appear to have been the subject of
111:
100:
96:
92:
197:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
128:significant coverage in reliable secondary sources
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
263:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
246:07:01, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
229:01:23, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
209:23:39, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
183:20:21, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
163:01:40, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
140:19:32, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
53:20:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
280:
236:: neologism, non-notable.
256:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
211:
271:
258:
204:
201:
196:
194:
159:
153:
114:
108:
90:
34:
279:
278:
274:
273:
272:
270:
269:
268:
267:
261:deletion review
254:
202:
199:
190:
157:
151:
110:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
277:
275:
266:
265:
249:
248:
231:
213:
212:
195:
187:
186:
185:
166:
165:
121:
120:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
276:
264:
262:
257:
251:
250:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
230:
226:
222:
218:
215:
214:
210:
207:
205:
193:
189:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
167:
164:
160:
154:
148:
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
118:
113:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
255:
252:
233:
216:
191:
122:
45:
43:
31:
28:
124:Non-notable
238:JamesBurns
147:neologism
152:MuZemike
117:View log
217:Delete.
84:protect
79:history
50:Spartaz
234:Delete
221:Drmies
171:crufty
149:, no?
112:delete
88:delete
67:CNNfan
59:CNNfan
46:delete
175:Gr1st
132:Gr1st
115:) – (
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
242:talk
225:talk
203:Loxy
200:Foxy
179:talk
158:talk
136:talk
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
244:)
227:)
181:)
173:.
161:)
138:)
130:.
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
240:(
223:(
177:(
155:(
134:(
119:)
109:(
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.