358:- The article, rather than the topic, needs to meet the General Notability Guideline? (Is that the standard?) The link to find sources/news above actually does find a fair number of mentions. (What are they?) That seems not to be the case here. (Why?) lacking sourcing. Fails WP:SOURCES for not having any. What about
236:
because its article is poorly sourced; for a topic to truly fail the GNG would be for significant coverage of it in independent reliable sources not to exist, and that seems not to be the case here. I know that the following is quite possibly the most tired argument at AfD, but the nominator should
167:
95:
90:
99:
82:
161:
86:
127:
78:
70:
122:
312:
as lacking sourcing, claim of notability, awards and charting. If in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources is added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page.
379:. While there are a few entries in third-party publications they all seem to be mentions in passing or directory listings. I can't find any in-depth coverage of this book.
215:- this request for deletion may be based on an erroneous notion. The link to find sources/news above actually does find a fair number of mentions in third-party sources.
269:
182:
149:
388:
371:
350:
321:
301:
281:
260:
224:
206:
64:
255:
362:? I suggest closing as no consensus since there's not much interest providing comments on the deletion request that the closer can use to make a decision.--
289:
143:
139:
339:
One interesting thing about the list is that it transcends genres - mixing rock, country, rap, gospel, folk and every other style of music imaginable,
189:
359:
155:
251:
198:
Article uses a dependent source, which is the book itself. Therefore, it makes the article fail the
General Notability Guideline.
17:
242:
337:
due to it's language, and even when assuming good faith is presented in a very non-neutral POV. My favorite quote is;
407:
40:
317:
403:
220:
36:
367:
334:
175:
384:
330:
313:
297:
277:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
402:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
238:
216:
199:
363:
346:
55:
380:
233:
293:
273:
116:
342:
396:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
341:
which is obviously promotional and non-neutral in nature.
79:
CCM Presents: The 100 Greatest Albums in
Christian Music
71:
CCM Presents: The 100 Greatest Albums in
Christian Music
112:
108:
104:
174:
241:and checked for other sources before nominating.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
410:). No further edits should be made to this page.
270:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
188:
8:
288:Note: This debate has been included in the
268:Note: This debate has been included in the
290:list of Music-related deletion discussions
287:
267:
360:Milwaukee Journal Sentinel March 29, 2001
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
389:13:05, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
372:01:32, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
351:04:30, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
333:for not having any, hinges on
322:22:01, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
302:01:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
282:01:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
261:20:14, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
225:23:46, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
207:22:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
65:13:11, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
427:
399:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
232:: a topic can't fail
48:The result was
304:
284:
259:
63:
418:
401:
249:
247:
204:
193:
192:
178:
130:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
426:
425:
421:
420:
419:
417:
416:
415:
414:
408:deletion review
397:
243:
200:
135:
126:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
424:
422:
413:
412:
392:
391:
374:
353:
324:
306:
305:
285:
264:
263:
237:have followed
227:
196:
195:
132:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
423:
411:
409:
405:
400:
394:
393:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
325:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
286:
283:
279:
275:
271:
266:
265:
262:
257:
253:
248:
246:
240:
235:
231:
228:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
210:
209:
208:
205:
203:
191:
187:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:Find sources:
133:
129:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
398:
395:
376:
355:
338:
335:WP:PROMOTION
326:
314:Stuartyeates
309:
244:
229:
212:
202:Interlude 65
201:
197:
185:
179:
171:
164:
158:
152:
146:
136:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
217:JoshuSasori
162:free images
364:Uzma Gamal
331:WP:SOURCES
58:Sandstein
404:talk page
294:• Gene93k
274:• Gene93k
239:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
406:or in a
381:De728631
123:View log
39:or in a
356:Comment
230:Comment
213:Comment
168:WP refs
156:scholar
96:protect
91:history
377:Delete
329:Fails
327:Delete
310:Delete
234:WP:GNG
140:Google
100:delete
50:delete
343:Яεñ99
183:JSTOR
144:books
128:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
385:talk
368:talk
347:talk
318:talk
298:talk
278:talk
221:talk
176:FENS
150:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
245:CtP
190:TWL
125:•
121:– (
387:)
370:)
349:)
320:)
300:)
292:.
280:)
272:.
254:•
223:)
170:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
52:.
383:(
366:(
345:(
316:(
296:(
276:(
258:)
256:c
252:t
250:(
219:(
194:)
186:·
180:·
172:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
142:(
134:(
131:)
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.