283:, at least until such time as more confirmed information comes along. The designation isn't going to change, so the redirect makes sense. This vessel will undoubtedly be notable upon its completion, and perhaps during actual construction - but I agree, it's way way way too early.
199:
this carrier is "tentatively scheduled to be commissioned in 2021", a decade from now, is un-named, and since none of the ships in this class have been completed, all of the data, from the speed to the complement to the number of aircraft are all just projections.
437:
Actually, I'd think that would be a really good argument for waiting and creating the article later, when there is something more substantial to report - and, more importantly, when there will be more sources on which to base the article.
164:
254:
125:
305:
class. There are a couple of listed sources in the article as well as the proposed name that should be preserved. If not then redirect. CVN's 79 and 80 are not even listed in the
327:
232:
158:
353:
280:
51:
444:
289:
17:
458:
There's enough information already. Public discussion over the name of a ship that has been definitely announced is sufficient
505:
40:
179:
146:
98:
93:
102:
371:
482:
215:
85:
390:
501:
140:
36:
419:
While commissioning will occur in 2021, other milestones will be reached in just a few years. It meets
367:
172:
136:
196:
478:
201:
486:
469:
448:
432:
411:
394:
377:
341:
318:
293:
268:
246:
224:
67:
402:
per the above posts. It doesn't seem possible to write anything about this ship at the moment.
439:
386:
337:
314:
284:
242:
186:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
500:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
428:
407:
359:
420:
264:
58:
465:
152:
333:
310:
238:
119:
424:
403:
362:, per the above - logical redirect, near 100% certainty ship will be built as a
89:
260:
306:
460:
81:
73:
494:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
423:
and I see no harm in leaving it as a stub in the interim years.
477:
to parent class article - not independently notable yet.
115:
111:
107:
171:
255:
185:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
508:). No further edits should be made to this page.
328:list of Aviation-related deletion discussions
233:list of Military-related deletion discussions
8:
326:Note: This debate has been included in the
253:Note: This debate has been included in the
231:Note: This debate has been included in the
325:
252:
230:
281:Gerald R. Ford class aircraft carrier
52:Gerald R. Ford class aircraft carrier
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
487:19:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
470:11:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
449:14:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
433:06:38, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
412:22:48, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
395:04:44, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
378:02:40, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
68:17:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
342:22:00, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
319:20:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
294:17:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
269:17:00, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
247:16:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
225:15:36, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
525:
497:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
400:Merge and redirect
383:merge and redirect
350:Merge and redirect
48:The result was
447:
366:class carrier. -
344:
331:
292:
271:
258:
249:
236:
222:
66:
516:
499:
443:
374:
360:aircraft carrier
332:
288:
259:
237:
221:
216:
213:
190:
189:
175:
123:
105:
65:
63:
56:
34:
524:
523:
519:
518:
517:
515:
514:
513:
512:
506:deletion review
495:
376:
372:
267:
217:
210:
206:
202:
132:
96:
80:
77:
59:
57:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
522:
520:
511:
510:
490:
489:
475:Merge/Redirect
472:
453:
452:
451:
414:
397:
380:
370:
368:The Bushranger
355:Gerald R. Ford
346:
345:
322:
321:
303:Gerald R. Ford
296:
273:
272:
263:
250:
208:
204:
193:
192:
129:
76:
71:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
521:
509:
507:
503:
498:
492:
491:
488:
484:
480:
479:GraemeLeggett
476:
473:
471:
467:
463:
462:
457:
454:
450:
446:
441:
436:
435:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
415:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
379:
375:
373:One ping only
369:
365:
361:
358:
356:
351:
348:
347:
343:
339:
335:
329:
324:
323:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
295:
291:
286:
282:
278:
275:
274:
270:
266:
262:
256:
251:
248:
244:
240:
234:
229:
228:
227:
226:
223:
220:
214:
212:
198:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
75:
72:
70:
69:
64:
62:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
496:
493:
474:
459:
455:
440:UltraExactZZ
416:
399:
387:Stuartyeates
382:
363:
354:
349:
302:
298:
285:UltraExactZZ
276:
218:
203:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
60:
49:
47:
31:
28:
159:free images
385:as above.
61:Sandstein
502:talk page
334:• Gene93k
239:• Gene93k
197:WP:HAMMER
50:merge to
37:talk page
504:or in a
277:Redirect
126:View log
39:or in a
211:anguard
165:WP refs
153:scholar
99:protect
94:history
425:Safiel
421:WP:GNG
404:Nick-D
357:-class
137:Google
103:delete
82:CVN-80
74:CVN-80
466:talk
309:yet.
299:Merge
261:Logan
180:JSTOR
141:books
120:views
112:watch
108:links
16:<
483:talk
456:Keep
429:talk
417:Keep
408:talk
391:talk
364:Ford
338:talk
315:talk
311:Brad
265:Talk
243:talk
219:Wha?
207:ven
195:Per
173:FENS
147:news
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
461:DGG
445:Did
352:to
307:NVR
301:to
290:Did
279:to
187:TWL
124:– (
485:)
468:)
431:)
410:)
393:)
340:)
330:.
317:)
257:.
245:)
235:.
167:)
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
55:.
481:(
464:(
442:~
427:(
406:(
389:(
336:(
313:(
287:~
241:(
209:M
205:S
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
122:)
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.