485:
rerelease of the film -- which in NOTFILM refers to theatrical releases, not DVD releases. (The criterion wouldn't make sense if it applied to DVD releases, it would say that the longer it takes a film to appear on DVD, the more notable the film is.) And the third claim isn't supported by reliable sources -- that may be what it says in
Barresi's article, but when you check the cited source, the information it's cited for isn't there! The overall GNG problem remains -- the only sources found so that discuss this are the sort characterized as "trivial" by the guideline, not supporting notability.
510:, criterion 2, item 3. Furthermore, the adult film industry distribution model changed radically in the five years following the film's original theatrical run. Grindhouse theaters closed across the country as the market moved to video sales and rentals. The fact that this film had three re-releases and is still sold online meets
502:. For an adult film to have a national run at that time was unusual, especially one shot on 35. Most were shot on 16, and some on 8. This was among the last wave of nationally-released narrative pornographic works prior to the straight-to-video market explosion. The multiple re-releases certainly qualify under
548:
None of the relevant claims you make are reliably sourced information. (Nor is the Harold Lime claim). And your "rerelease" argument is absolute nonsense; it amounts to saying that any film made more than five years before DVDs were available is inherently notable if was later released on DVD. That's
484:
don't hold water. Neither being shot on 35mm film nor having a theatrical release is listed as a NOTFILM criterion (and neither is even mentioned in the article, to say nothing of being reliably sourced, if that matters here). The links
Jokestress provides have nothing to do with a commercial
197:
Non-notable pornographic film, article consists only of brief plot summary, short cast list, and unsupported claim taken from user comment at IMDB. No assertion of WP:NOTABILITY, no sources, no indication of any independent 3d party coverage, therefore failing the GNG.
283:. Actually, the sourcing that's been added doesn't demonstrate notability. Aside from a now-deleted link to a retailer site, the citations to the "almanac" and the encyclopedias fail under the applicable notability guideline,
166:
127:
160:
549:
flat-out ridiculous. Rather than arguing based on your ideas about what makes a porn film important, please provide what's required by the general notability guideline: "
380:
The film features significant involvement (i.e. one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of his/her career.
239:
216:. Film's cast included many notable porn stars, some of whom were doing mainstream work at the same time. Article helps avoid reader confusion by disambiguating
94:
89:
98:
81:
181:
17:
148:
59:
490:
464:
292:
203:
507:
142:
627:
36:
52:
486:
288:
199:
138:
271:
612:
591:
574:
543:
494:
468:
433:
400:
354:
323:
296:
275:
257:
229:
207:
63:
626:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
570:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
386:
appeared in the film as his first straight-market porno following involvement in gay-market modeling and film.
188:
287:, which states that sources like "listings in comprehensive film guides" are not sources satisfying the GNG.
85:
531:
217:
452:
391:
I am happy to provide sourcing in print and online biographies for notable figures who appear in the film.
608:
587:
431:
319:
77:
69:
364:(it has had several re-releases since its film debut, including VHS and at least 2 DVD releases). See
539:
396:
267:
254:
225:
604:
600:
511:
503:
481:
445:
373:
332:
307:
284:
154:
566:
530:. I still believe this article is most helpful for general readers to disambiguate the short-lived
460:
365:
174:
412:
583:
515:
424:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
523:
315:
535:
392:
246:
221:
310:. Mentions and trivial coverage in books of trivia and books of lists don't change that.
456:
514:
criteria. This featured an ensemble cast of very well-known actors and was made by
383:
115:
527:
519:
369:
314:
coverage in multiple reliable sources would....but this film doesn't have that.
346:
551:
significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
417:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
620:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
599:
does not prove with independent reliable sources that it meets
565:. Doesn't pass NOTFILM for me per Wolfowitz's arguments.
122:
111:
107:
103:
506:, which says nothing about theatrical re-release. See
173:
422:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
187:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
630:). No further edits should be made to this page.
266:per sourcing provided by Jokestress. Well done.
8:
532:TV series of the same name and release date
234:
240:list of Film-related deletion discussions
220:. Added some citations since nomination.
238:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
331:. Meets at least three criteria per
382:For instance, controversial figure
480:. Jokestress's comments regarding
24:
351:had a national theatrical release
613:01:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
64:15:05, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
592:16:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
575:10:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
544:16:07, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
495:02:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
469:02:10, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
434:00:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
401:15:52, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
324:14:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
297:00:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
276:07:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
258:03:23, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
230:02:53, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
208:20:45, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
647:
623:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
444:per Jokestress. Passes
218:Co-Ed Fever (TV series)
53:Backslash Forwardslash
487:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
362:commercial re-release
360:The film was given a
289:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
200:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
508:General principles
78:Co-Ed Fever (film)
70:Co-Ed Fever (film)
44:The result was
516:XRCO Hall of Fame
472:
455:comment added by
436:
260:
243:
638:
625:
524:AVN Hall of Fame
471:
449:
427:
421:
419:
415:
252:
244:
192:
191:
177:
125:
119:
101:
34:
646:
645:
641:
640:
639:
637:
636:
635:
634:
628:deletion review
621:
582:fails NOTFILM.
450:
425:
413:
410:
345:It was shot on
268:MichaelQSchmidt
250:
134:
121:
92:
76:
73:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
644:
642:
633:
632:
616:
615:
594:
577:
567:Morbidthoughts
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
474:
473:
438:
437:
420:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
389:
388:
387:
377:
358:
338:
337:
336:
335:
301:
300:
299:
261:
232:
195:
194:
131:
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
643:
631:
629:
624:
618:
617:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
595:
593:
589:
585:
581:
578:
576:
572:
568:
564:
561:
560:
552:
547:
546:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
498:
497:
496:
492:
488:
483:
479:
476:
475:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
447:
443:
440:
439:
435:
432:
429:
428:
418:
416:
409:
408:
402:
398:
394:
390:
385:
381:
378:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
356:
352:
349:and the film
348:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
334:
330:
327:
326:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
262:
259:
256:
253:
249:
241:
237:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
129:
124:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
622:
619:
596:
584:Darrenhusted
579:
562:
550:
499:
477:
441:
426:Juliancolton
423:
411:
384:Paul Barresi
379:
374:re-release 3
370:re-release 2
366:re-release 1
361:
350:
328:
311:
303:
280:
263:
247:
235:
213:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
55:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
528:Gary Graver
520:Harold Lime
451:—Preceding
316:Niteshift36
312:Significant
161:free images
601:WP:NOTFILM
536:Jokestress
512:WP:NOTFILM
504:WP:NOTFILM
482:WP:NOTFILM
446:WP:NOTFILM
393:Jokestress
347:35 mm film
333:WP:NOTFILM
308:WP:NOTFILM
285:WP:NOTFILM
222:Jokestress
605:Algébrico
526:director
518:producer
457:Gosox5555
355:one-sheet
465:contribs
453:unsigned
414:Relisted
306:. Fails
128:View log
500:Comment
478:Comment
329:Comment
281:Comment
167:WP refs
155:scholar
95:protect
90:history
597:Delete
580:Delete
563:Delete
304:Delete
255:(talk)
139:Google
123:delete
99:delete
46:delete
353:(see
251:cobra
248:Cyber
182:JSTOR
143:books
126:) – (
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
609:talk
588:talk
571:talk
540:talk
522:and
491:talk
461:talk
442:Keep
397:talk
320:talk
293:talk
272:talk
264:Keep
236:Note
226:talk
214:Keep
204:talk
175:FENS
149:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
60:talk
448:.
245:--
189:TWL
611:)
603:.
590:)
573:)
553:."
542:)
534:.
493:)
467:)
463:•
430:|
399:)
372:,
368:,
357:).
322:)
295:)
274:)
242:.
228:)
206:)
169:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
62:)
48:.
607:(
586:(
569:(
538:(
489:(
459:(
395:(
376:)
318:(
291:(
270:(
224:(
202:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
120:(
118:)
80:(
58:(
56:/
50:\
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.