Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Cox & Forkum - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

197:
Looking for sources about this editorial cartoon series produced lots of funny cartoons but no substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. Tagged for notability since July 2009 with no sources added since.
166: 288:
Their own books definitely don't count toward notability, and I don't think GoodReads would either since the content there is user-generated. The ComixTalk review and the interview are relevant. --
335:
is an interview of the actual artists themselves, not just a review of their work. Since it's important to some editors that WP be comprehensive in its coverage of people (consider all of the
119: 215: 235: 160: 126: 332: 267: 309:
No significant coverage in reliable sources at all. Blogs like ComixTalk.com, GoodReads.com, and CapitalismMagazine.com are unreliable. See
342:
it lists, for example), I would think that C&F would have the amount of notoriety/fame to meet the minimum inclusion requirements. —
92: 87: 96: 17: 79: 181: 259: 148: 453: 40: 318: 310: 142: 434: 413: 382: 351: 322: 297: 279: 247: 227: 207: 138: 83: 61: 57: 449: 409: 378: 314: 36: 188: 75: 67: 347: 275: 430: 174: 394: 363: 258:— They published four books (collections of their cartoons). Here is a review of their site at 263: 243: 223: 53: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
448:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
405: 374: 293: 203: 154: 343: 339: 271: 426: 336: 239: 219: 113: 289: 199: 397:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
366:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
52:. Assume good faith - improve and expand before nominating again, please. 331:
You could say that CapitalismMagazine.com is an unreliable source, but
442:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109: 105: 101: 173: 404:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 373:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 187: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 456:). No further edits should be made to this page. 216:list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions 236:list of Politics-related deletion discussions 8: 234:Note: This debate has been included in the 214:Note: This debate has been included in the 425:. just passes the notability requirement. 266:. Here's an interview with the authors at 233: 213: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 262:, and a referral of their books at 24: 1: 435:12:45, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 414:01:26, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 298:17:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 280:20:27, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 248:16:58, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 228:16:58, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 208:18:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 62:03:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 383:02:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC) 352:17:49, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 323:18:57, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 473: 445:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 268:CapitalismMagazine.com 270:. Do these count? — 48:The result was 416: 385: 250: 230: 464: 447: 403: 399: 372: 368: 315:Rangoondispenser 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 76:Cox & Forkum 68:Cox & Forkum 34: 472: 471: 467: 466: 465: 463: 462: 461: 460: 454:deletion review 443: 392: 361: 311:WP:QUESTIONABLE 134: 125: 90: 74: 71: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 470: 468: 459: 458: 438: 437: 419: 418: 417: 401: 400: 389: 388: 387: 386: 370: 369: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 326: 325: 303: 302: 301: 300: 283: 282: 252: 251: 231: 195: 194: 131: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 469: 457: 455: 451: 446: 440: 439: 436: 432: 428: 424: 421: 420: 415: 411: 407: 402: 398: 396: 391: 390: 384: 380: 376: 371: 367: 365: 360: 359: 353: 349: 345: 341: 338: 334: 330: 329: 328: 327: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 305: 304: 299: 295: 291: 287: 286: 285: 284: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 264:GoodReads.com 261: 260:ComixTalk.com 257: 254: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 232: 229: 225: 221: 217: 212: 211: 210: 209: 205: 201: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 444: 441: 422: 393: 362: 306: 255: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 54:SarahStierch 49: 47: 31: 28: 406:Mark Arsten 375:Mark Arsten 161:free images 344:Loadmaster 272:Loadmaster 450:talk page 427:De Guerre 240:• Gene93k 220:• Gene93k 37:talk page 452:or in a 395:Relisted 364:Relisted 340:athletes 333:the link 120:View log 39:or in a 337:obscure 167:WP refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 307:Delete 290:RL0919 200:RL0919 139:Google 97:delete 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 431:talk 423:Keep 410:talk 379:talk 348:talk 319:talk 294:talk 276:talk 256:Keep 244:talk 224:talk 204:talk 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 50:keep 189:TWL 118:– ( 433:) 412:) 381:) 350:) 321:) 313:. 296:) 278:) 246:) 238:. 226:) 218:. 206:) 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 429:( 408:( 377:( 346:( 317:( 292:( 274:( 242:( 222:( 202:( 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:· 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
SarahStierch
talk
03:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Cox & Forkum
Cox & Forkum
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
RL0919
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.