204:
The article has four references in it. Two are about a barely related subject (Harvard's i-lab) and two are significant coverage from independent and seemingly reliable sources. Still, neither source ("AddictiveTips" and "MakeTechEasier") are what I would consider a large source and as
252:
instant messaging apps with their own incompatible proprietary protocol. The analysis of situation sources by nominator appears correct (although I would note that
Edudemic is actually a reprint from Harvard Gazette). I would argue that
291:
and covers this situation, to a degree. I'm not sure how new that is but I've seen several situations just like this one where articles about a product and company are kept because of inherited notability. I'm glad it's been added.
163:
219:
There may be more coverage out there but it's hard to find anything in the slew of download pages scattered across the internet. It doesn't help that "Coco" has so many other uses, either.
257:
doesn't apply to this article at all, but I still would expect at least one reputable source in addition to "AddictiveTips" and "MakeTechEasier", which are at best second-grade sources. —
157:
116:
332:
312:
353:
123:
89:
84:
93:
76:
178:
17:
145:
222:
On a side note, this was the author's first article and the only other article they worked on was the creating company's article (
201:
Outside of the four references in the article, I could find no more significant coverage from independent and reliable sources.
266:
373:
I couldn't find any significant coverage for Coco or Coco Voice. The references in the article are very unimpressive. --
139:
401:
40:
135:
382:
365:
344:
324:
301:
270:
239:
58:
185:
80:
397:
72:
64:
36:
56:
284:
151:
171:
378:
361:
262:
209:
points out, "at least one regional, national, or international source is necessary." Also, both
340:
320:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
396:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
249:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
297:
235:
288:
280:
276:
254:
227:
206:
195:
53:
374:
357:
279:
is the only part of the notability guideline that mentions products, outside of what
258:
336:
316:
110:
293:
231:
223:
213:
210:
390:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
106:
102:
98:
170:
184:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
404:). No further edits should be made to this page.
354:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Instanza
356:about the company that makes this product. --
333:list of Software-related deletion discussions
313:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
8:
331:Note: This debate has been included in the
311:Note: This debate has been included in the
216:blogs which may not help their reliability.
330:
310:
248:: yet another drop in the torrent of
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
198:'s subsection for products.
421:
383:02:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
366:02:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
345:22:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
325:22:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
302:14:34, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
271:02:10, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
240:01:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
59:05:22, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
393:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
226:). They seem to be an
275:I was surprised that
259:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
73:Coco (application)
65:Coco (application)
48:The result was
347:
327:
250:indistinguishable
412:
395:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
34:
420:
419:
415:
414:
413:
411:
410:
409:
408:
402:deletion review
391:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
418:
416:
407:
406:
386:
385:
368:
349:
348:
328:
307:
306:
305:
304:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
417:
405:
403:
399:
394:
388:
387:
384:
380:
376:
372:
369:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
329:
326:
322:
318:
314:
309:
308:
303:
299:
295:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
251:
247:
244:
243:
242:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
220:
217:
215:
212:
208:
202:
199:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
392:
389:
370:
245:
221:
218:
203:
200:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
158:free images
285:WP:PRODUCT
214:themselves
54:j⚛e decker
398:talk page
352:See also
337:• Gene93k
317:• Gene93k
283:covers.
37:talk page
400:or in a
375:MelanieN
358:MelanieN
224:Instanza
117:View log
39:or in a
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
371:Delete
294:WCS100
289:WP:ORG
287:is in
281:WP:GNG
277:WP:ORG
255:WP:ORG
246:Delete
232:WCS100
228:WP:SPA
207:WP:AUD
196:WP:ORG
194:Fails
136:Google
94:delete
50:delete
267:track
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
379:talk
362:talk
341:talk
321:talk
298:talk
263:talk
236:talk
211:call
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
186:TWL
115:– (
381:)
364:)
343:)
335:.
323:)
315:.
300:)
269:)
238:)
230:.
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
52:.
377:(
360:(
339:(
319:(
296:(
265:•
261:(
234:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.