Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Conception chart - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

249:
reference it, even poorly. It discusses the origins and uses of the thing without saying what it is, and even fails to provide references for that, so we have nothing which might help us with the missing context. The best thing is to redirect it. It is practically an orphan article anyway, with only a single incoming link from a disambiguation page. If somebody wants to recreate it as an article later then they can. So long as they provide a coherent statement as to what it actually is and reference it in a way that shows that it is a longstanding idea in astrology then it could be OK but that would be a completely new article. There is nothing to rescue here that I can see. --
243:
without prejudice to it becoming an article again if somebody can write it properly. The Google Books search shows that the term is used in astrology but the usage seems inconsistent. Of course it hard to tell as it is all mumbo jumbo but what is not clear is whether it is all (or predominately) the
248:
mumbo jumbo, forming what might be a semi-coherent and even notable element in the history of astrology, or whether it is merely a vague term used by different astrologers however they please. The article is no help here at all. It does not pin down exactly what it is talking about, never mind
273: 178: 131: 341: 321: 172: 138: 104: 99: 108: 220: 17: 91: 193: 160: 373: 40: 154: 277: 353: 333: 312: 293: 258: 226: 73: 150: 66: 281: 214: 369: 329: 254: 200: 95: 36: 349: 305: 289: 186: 57: 210: 166: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
368:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
325: 302: 250: 87: 79: 345: 285: 125: 272:. A mention of the term there is probably deserved, but should be sourced to 269: 240: 236: 53: 362:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
121: 117: 113: 185: 199: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 376:). No further edits should be made to this page. 340:Note: This discussion has been included in the 320:Note: This discussion has been included in the 342:list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions 322:list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions 8: 339: 319: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 301:without prejudice to recreation per 24: 209:Unsourced astrology/folklore. 1: 280:(hopefully not confused with 354:21:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC) 334:22:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC) 313:00:28, 5 February 2018 (UTC) 294:22:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC) 259:22:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC) 227:21:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC) 74:03:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC) 393: 274:a nominally objective view 365:Please do not modify it. 278:James R. Lewis (scholar) 32:Please do not modify it. 282:Jim Lewis (astrologer) 276:, such as that by 356: 336: 384: 367: 310: 303:User:DanielRigal 223: 217: 204: 203: 189: 141: 129: 111: 88:Conception chart 80:Conception chart 72: 69: 61: 34: 392: 391: 387: 386: 385: 383: 382: 381: 380: 374:deletion review 363: 308:Seraphim System 306: 221: 215: 146: 137: 102: 86: 83: 67: 64: 59: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 390: 388: 379: 378: 358: 357: 337: 316: 315: 296: 262: 261: 207: 206: 143: 82: 77: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 389: 377: 375: 371: 366: 360: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 338: 335: 331: 327: 323: 318: 317: 314: 311: 309: 304: 300: 297: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 264: 263: 260: 256: 252: 247: 242: 238: 234: 231: 230: 229: 228: 224: 218: 212: 202: 198: 195: 192: 188: 184: 180: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 152: 149: 148:Find sources: 144: 140: 136: 133: 127: 123: 119: 115: 110: 106: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 84: 81: 78: 76: 75: 70: 63: 62: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 364: 361: 307: 298: 265: 245: 232: 211:power~enwiki 208: 196: 190: 182: 175: 169: 163: 157: 147: 134: 58: 49: 47: 31: 28: 326:DanielRigal 251:DanielRigal 173:free images 346:Jack Frost 286:LuckyLouie 235:to either 60:CYBERPOWER 370:talk page 270:Astrology 241:Astrology 237:Horoscope 54:Astrology 37:talk page 372:or in a 299:Redirect 266:Redirect 233:Redirect 132:View log 50:redirect 39:or in a 179:WP refs 167:scholar 105:protect 100:history 151:Google 109:delete 68:Around 284:). - 194:JSTOR 155:books 139:Stats 126:views 118:watch 114:links 16:< 350:talk 330:talk 290:talk 255:talk 246:same 187:FENS 161:news 122:logs 96:talk 92:edit 268:to 239:or 201:TWL 130:– ( 56:. — 52:to 352:) 344:. 332:) 324:. 292:) 257:) 225:) 219:, 181:) 124:| 120:| 116:| 112:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 348:( 328:( 288:( 253:( 222:ν 216:π 213:( 205:) 197:· 191:· 183:· 176:· 170:· 164:· 158:· 153:( 145:( 142:) 135:· 128:) 90:( 71:) 65:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Astrology
CYBERPOWER
Around
03:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Conception chart
Conception chart
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
power~enwiki

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.