233:
465:
The version even at the time of nomination had a New York Times full obituary as the reference. This is considered unquestioned evidence of notability (not all papers, of course, but the NYT and the London Times due to their reputation for selectivity--reckless assertion about covering every literary
331:
Connie
Clausen was more than a "run of the mill circus performer and literary agent". Run of the mill circus performers don't publish memoirs that are considered authorative on the 20th Century circus experience and are used as a teaching reference by the Ringling Musuem and cited in works such as
395:
mentions has a full entry on her as well. Actually, for me the most interesting reference was in Tait's book, as she was looking at how
Clausen described her treatment in the circus in her memoirs. Overall, she seems like a good fit for Knowledge (XXG). :) -
214:. It's nothing more than a professional courtesy, since New York is the center of the publishing industry, so the obit really doesn't mean anything--except, of course, for the fact that it highlights the reality that this woman had to die before the
267:
There are at least five separate reviews, which would go toward satisfying the first criteria of WP:BK. (And it's likely that there are many other reviews in publications that aren't electronically archived back to the 1960s.)
415:
314:
317:
available too. Run-of-the-mill are indeed notable if they're received RS coverage of their work. Since when does a book need to be 'culturally significant' or 'controversial' to pass notability?
383:- I added some refs and stuff. In researching her, it was clear that she has an interesting and varied history, and had received extensive coverage in reliable sources. As mentioned by
391:, there were lots of reviews of her book published back in the early 60's, as well as quite a few references before that to her television and entertainment career. The O'Boyle book
171:, and probably a few more guidelines we could throw at it. Run-of-the-mill circus performers and literary agents are inherently non-notable, and she was both of these things.
136:
441:
332:
the biography of the
Russian choreographer Balanchine. And she was a top New York literary agent responsible for many bestsellers of the 1970's, 80's and 90's.
293:. Not only do we have the NY Times obit, but we also have an apparently non-trivial mention in the O'Boyle book. In my opinion, that's enough to satisfy
168:
103:
98:
17:
107:
90:
65:
492:
36:
190:
349:
When I did the initial editing-there was lots of information about Connie
Clausen that made her notable.Thank you-
491:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
384:
319:
143:
Non-notable entertainment hack who was a jack of all trades without becoming notable in any of them. Fails
477:
456:
430:
405:
375:
358:
341:
323:
306:
277:
262:
244:
227:
202:
180:
72:
371:
452:
426:
337:
94:
57:
273:
240:
198:
367:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
448:
422:
333:
258:
223:
176:
294:
164:
144:
401:
250:
160:
156:
302:
86:
78:
49:
152:
148:
473:
388:
354:
269:
236:
194:
124:
254:
219:
172:
397:
392:
298:
232:
Nope! Her book was reviwed in the Times (and several other papers) in 1961.
468:
350:
253:. The title in question wasn't culturally significant or controversial.
193:. What evidence is there of a COI, or even a single-purpose account?
210:
Every literary agent who dies in New York gets written up in the
485:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
416:
list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions
189:, important enough to get an article-length obit in the
131:
120:
116:
112:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
495:). No further edits should be made to this page.
366:Well referenced article. RSs imply notability.
8:
442:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
218:deigned to publish an article about her.
440:: This debate has been included in the
414:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
512:
169:WP:Single-purpose account
488:Please do not modify it.
478:18:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
457:00:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
431:00:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
406:22:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
376:21:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
359:19:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
342:20:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
324:13:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
307:13:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
278:04:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
263:04:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
245:04:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
228:04:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
203:04:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
181:04:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
73:12:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
249:That doesn't satisfy
48:(non-admin closure)——
44:The result was
459:
445:
433:
419:
503:
490:
446:
436:
420:
410:
134:
128:
110:
70:
69:
62:
61:
54:
53:
34:
511:
510:
506:
505:
504:
502:
501:
500:
499:
493:deletion review
486:
322:
130:
101:
85:
82:
67:
66:
59:
58:
51:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
509:
507:
498:
497:
481:
480:
460:
434:
408:
385:TravellingCari
378:
361:
344:
326:
320:TravellingCari
318:
309:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
191:New York Times
141:
140:
87:Connie Clausen
81:
79:Connie Clausen
76:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
508:
496:
494:
489:
483:
482:
479:
475:
471:
470:
464:
461:
458:
454:
450:
443:
439:
435:
432:
428:
424:
417:
413:
409:
407:
403:
399:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
343:
339:
335:
330:
327:
325:
321:
316:
313:
310:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
279:
276:
275:
271:
266:
265:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
243:
242:
238:
234:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
205:
204:
201:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
184:
183:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
138:
133:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
71:
63:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
487:
484:
467:
462:
437:
411:
380:
368:Gimme danger
363:
346:
328:
311:
290:
272:
239:
215:
211:
207:
197:
186:
142:
45:
43:
31:
28:
449:Fabrictramp
423:Fabrictramp
334:Sangroncito
466:agent.)
463:Snow Keep
389:Zagalejo
270:Zagalejo
237:Zagalejo
208:Comment.
195:Zagalejo
137:View log
315:more RS
104:protect
99:history
295:WP:BIO
255:Qworty
220:Qworty
173:Qworty
165:WP:COI
145:WP:BIO
132:delete
108:delete
398:Bilby
251:WP:BK
216:Times
212:Times
161:WP:BK
157:WP:RS
135:) – (
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
474:talk
453:talk
438:Note
427:talk
412:Note
402:talk
393:Scog
387:and
381:Keep
372:talk
364:Keep
355:talk
347:Keep
338:talk
329:Keep
312:Keep
303:talk
299:Scog
291:Keep
259:talk
224:talk
187:Keep
177:talk
153:WP:V
149:WP:N
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
52:Ryan
46:Keep
469:DGG
447:--
444:.
421:--
418:.
351:RFD
274:^^^
241:^^^
199:^^^
476:)
455:)
429:)
404:)
374:)
357:)
340:)
305:)
297:.
261:)
235:.
226:)
179:)
167:,
163:,
159:,
155:,
151:,
147:,
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
64:•
56:|
472:(
451:(
425:(
400:(
370:(
353:(
336:(
301:(
257:(
222:(
175:(
139:)
129:(
127:)
89:(
68:c
60:t
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.