Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Consumers' Institute of New Zealand - Knowledge

Source 📝

288:
I don't think any real effort has been put into finding sources here.  Almost every hit on both books and the web is finding something.  Just from reading the snippets I know that the company has existed since 1959 and was publicly funded up until 1988, which by itself proves that the company will be
350:
I added some statements with citations, so now there are some sources. I feel that what I have added demonstrates that the subject of this article has received significant coverage in multiple publications which are independent of the subject, and for that reason, this article meets Knowledge
359:
by Knowledge community guidelines so the usual practice is for me to declare this when I edit articles which could be promotional and for me to ask other editors to put extra scrutiny on what I do. I actually am employed to share consumer information on Knowledge - see
170: 425:
mentioning them in the NZ Herald (the country's largest newspaper). Their reports are often the subject of the article, and they are also consulted & quoted in an 'advisory' or 'authority' capacity. This would appear to satisfy
123: 164: 96: 91: 100: 83: 307: 289:
wp:notable once a few good references are documented.  The company has published many books.  But it is going to take more research, and the article currently fails WP:V.
263: 130: 226: 87: 185: 152: 422: 79: 71: 462: 444: 413: 396: 379: 338: 319: 298: 272: 254: 65: 387:
as the organisation is sufficiently notable in NZ. Often cited in the national media in regard to consumer issues. Article needs work.
241:(yes, the magazine title ends with a period). I found only passing references with one exception. The Geek Zone website had a forum at 146: 355:
in the United States. I know nothing about Consumer NZ and actually these kinds of organizations exist in many countries. I have a
209:, due to the lack of reliable, third-party sources. Tagged as failing GNG for 4 years (!), time to settle this one way or another. 142: 17: 192: 404:- With the locating and adding of sources this article now has more to support it than just the organization's website. 158: 481: 458: 334: 326: 294: 40: 372: 477: 392: 221: 36: 242: 454: 438: 330: 325:
Changing from incubate to keep since the WP:V problems in the article no longer rise to the level of
290: 351:
inclusion criteria and should be kept. However - I work for a sister organization of Consumer NZ -
210: 178: 409: 361: 250: 430:. I'll rename the page as well, since it doesn't reflect the current title of the organization. 365: 315: 268: 60: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
476:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
388: 352: 427: 405: 356: 246: 206: 202: 311: 54: 117: 433: 245:, which is a blog and cannot be used as a reliable source in this discussion. 237:- I looked for internet references to the organization and its magazine, 421:
per NealeFamily this organization is well-known within NZ. For example,
243:
http://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=48&topicid=113982
470:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113: 109: 105: 177: 308:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 484:). No further edits should be made to this page. 264:list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions 191: 8: 364:for some descriptions of what I do. Thanks. 306:Note: This debate has been included in the 262:Note: This debate has been included in the 305: 261: 70: 7: 80:Consumers' Institute of New Zealand 72:Consumers' Institute of New Zealand 402:Change my vote from Delete to Keep 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 501: 453:I agree with the rename. 423:here is a list of articles 463:00:42, 20 July 2013 (UTC) 445:01:50, 19 July 2013 (UTC) 414:20:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 397:20:14, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 380:20:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 339:00:09, 16 July 2013 (UTC) 320:01:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 299:01:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 273:23:31, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 255:11:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 227:10:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 66:17:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC) 473:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 357:conflict of interest 223:(tell Luke off here) 327:WP:Deletion policy 48:The result was 443: 322: 275: 492: 475: 431: 377: 376: 370: 353:Consumer Reports 271: 219: 216: 213: 201:Appears to fail 196: 195: 181: 133: 121: 103: 34: 500: 499: 495: 494: 493: 491: 490: 489: 488: 482:deletion review 471: 455:Unscintillating 442: 374: 373: 366: 331:Unscintillating 291:Unscintillating 267: 217: 214: 211: 138: 129: 94: 78: 75: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 498: 496: 487: 486: 467: 466: 465: 448: 447: 436: 416: 399: 382: 368:Blue Rasberry 344: 343: 342: 341: 302: 301: 277: 276: 258: 257: 199: 198: 135: 74: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 497: 485: 483: 479: 474: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 451: 450: 449: 446: 440: 435: 429: 424: 420: 417: 415: 411: 407: 403: 400: 398: 394: 390: 386: 383: 381: 378: 371: 369: 363: 358: 354: 349: 346: 345: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 323: 321: 317: 313: 309: 304: 303: 300: 296: 292: 287: 286: 282: 279: 278: 274: 270: 265: 260: 259: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 235: 231: 230: 229: 228: 225: 224: 220: 208: 204: 194: 190: 187: 184: 180: 176: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 144: 141: 140:Find sources: 136: 132: 128: 125: 119: 115: 111: 107: 102: 98: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 76: 73: 68: 67: 63: 62: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 472: 469: 418: 406:Bill Pollard 401: 384: 367: 347: 284: 283: 280: 247:Bill Pollard 238: 233: 232: 222: 200: 188: 182: 174: 167: 161: 155: 149: 139: 126: 59: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 389:NealeFamily 362:WP:CONSUMER 165:free images 478:talk page 312:• Gene93k 239:Consumer. 37:talk page 480:or in a 285:Incubate 124:View log 39:or in a 269:gadfium 171:WP refs 159:scholar 97:protect 92:history 55:postdlf 434:porges 428:WP:ORG 375:(talk) 234:Delete 207:WP:GNG 203:WP:ORG 143:Google 101:delete 186:JSTOR 147:books 131:Stats 118:views 110:watch 106:links 16:< 459:talk 439:talk 419:Keep 410:talk 393:talk 385:Keep 348:Keep 335:talk 316:talk 295:talk 281:Keep 251:talk 212:Luke 205:and 179:FENS 153:news 114:logs 88:talk 84:edit 61:talk 50:keep 329:. 193:TWL 122:– ( 461:) 412:) 395:) 337:) 318:) 310:. 297:) 266:. 253:) 218:94 215:no 173:) 116:| 112:| 108:| 104:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 64:) 52:. 457:( 441:) 437:( 432:— 408:( 391:( 333:( 314:( 293:( 249:( 197:) 189:· 183:· 175:· 168:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 145:( 137:( 134:) 127:· 120:) 82:( 58:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
postdlf
talk
17:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Consumers' Institute of New Zealand
Consumers' Institute of New Zealand
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:ORG
WP:GNG

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.