392:
are acceptable articles as they stand (though as a
Protestant I know little of the subject. However, the stub section/cross-refernece at the end might be better deleted and handled by having a "see also" capnote. This might warrnat a name change perhaps
229:
Yup, I noticed that was the sequence of events. I know there's a paragraph or two that deals specifically with music outside the liturgy, but even if we stripped the rest out, that would still be unreferenced. Maybe a subsection in
158:
215:
The liturgical article did not exist when I created this article. I do think there are likely differences between the two, but I don't know if I have a set view on this article as it stands now.--
411:
That title sounds a bit awkward to me -- I don't think we need to specify non-liturgical, as long as we link prominently to the liturgical article, and maybe provide a paragraph summary.
152:
271:
119:
92:
87:
96:
79:
353:. Looks OK, if not great. Could use some further work, and merging could be a good idea. Content and references are enough to not delete. --
389:
372:
190:
173:
140:
48:. No agruments for deletion aside from the nominator. The issue of what to merge into what can continue on the article's talk page. (
83:
394:
17:
134:
450:
428:
406:
380:
362:
345:
314:
286:
257:
243:
224:
206:
61:
326:
231:
130:
189:
Tagged as unreferenced since
December 2006. Not sure that there's enough material to support an article separate from
75:
67:
49:
180:
467:
36:
466:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
194:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
446:
424:
402:
239:
202:
146:
339:
329:
per above convo. Doesn't seem enough to warrant its own article, but a section in CCM would be useful.
310:
282:
57:
253:
220:
358:
166:
442:
420:
398:
235:
198:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
333:
306:
297:
278:
53:
249:
216:
377:
354:
113:
376:- A merge seems appropriate to me, but this would be a more appropriate title.--
441:
I agree. My rename suggestion is clumsy. CAn you think of a better one?
300:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
460:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
105:
101:
165:
305:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
272:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
470:). No further edits should be made to this page.
413:(Oh, I pity the admin who has to make sense of
179:
8:
395:Contemporary Catholic non-liturgical music
266:
270:: This debate has been included in the
390:Contemporary Catholic liturgical music
373:Contemporary Catholic liturgical music
191:Contemporary Catholic liturgical music
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
287:23:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
258:23:01, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
244:13:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
225:00:14, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
207:20:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
327:Contemporary Christian music
232:Contemporary Christian music
451:22:23, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
429:17:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
407:17:04, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
381:16:49, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
363:11:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
346:02:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
315:00:01, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
76:Contemporary Catholic music
68:Contemporary Catholic music
62:23:29, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
487:
463:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
234:would be warranted? --
248:That could be fine.--
197:are stripped out.
44:The result was
418:
388:-- both this and
344:
317:
289:
275:
195:WP:external links
50:non-admin closure
478:
465:
412:
343:
336:
330:
304:
302:
276:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
34:
486:
485:
481:
480:
479:
477:
476:
475:
474:
468:deletion review
461:
334:
331:
295:
126:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
484:
482:
473:
472:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
434:
433:
432:
431:
383:
365:
348:
319:
318:
303:
292:
291:
290:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
483:
471:
469:
464:
458:
452:
448:
444:
443:Peterkingiron
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
430:
426:
422:
421:SarekOfVulcan
416:
410:
409:
408:
404:
400:
399:Peterkingiron
396:
391:
387:
384:
382:
379:
375:
374:
371:
366:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:
347:
342:
341:
337:
328:
324:
321:
320:
316:
312:
308:
301:
299:
294:
293:
288:
284:
280:
273:
269:
265:
259:
255:
251:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
236:SarekOfVulcan
233:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
199:SarekOfVulcan
196:
193:once all the
192:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
462:
459:
414:
385:
369:
367:
350:
332:
322:
296:
267:
212:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
335:JUJUTACULAR
307:Ron Ritzman
279:Ron Ritzman
153:free images
54:Ron Ritzman
250:T. Anthony
217:T. Anthony
378:Unionhawk
355:SmokeyJoe
298:Relisted
120:View log
417:AfD...)
213:Comment
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
368:Merge
131:Google
97:delete
325:with
323:Merge
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
447:talk
425:talk
415:this
403:talk
386:Keep
370:from
359:talk
351:Keep
340:TALK
311:talk
283:talk
268:Note
254:talk
240:talk
221:talk
203:talk
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
46:keep
397:.
277:--
181:TWL
118:– (
449:)
427:)
419:--
405:)
361:)
338:|
313:)
285:)
274:.
256:)
242:)
223:)
205:)
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:)
445:(
423:(
401:(
357:(
309:(
281:(
252:(
238:(
219:(
201:(
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.