Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Copyright in Historical Perspective - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

142:
This book is a classic (the article does say that this scholarly book is still in print almost four decades into its existence). It's the key work by one of the most eminent American copyright scholars. You will find
86: 81: 90: 73: 113: 166:(Book Reviews : Lyman Ray Patterson, Copyright in historical perspective, de Meij, International Communication Gazette.1970; 16:241), but I don't have access to it. 185: 155: 77: 144: 69: 61: 342: 330: 303: 289: 277: 259: 247: 232: 201: 170: 133: 55: 321: 243:
per nomination. We have guidelines for articles on published works, and this does not appear to satisfy the criteria laid out there.
17: 325: 270: 179: 197: 357: 36: 356:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
120:
No indicaiton this book is notable; no independent sources, no critical review. A directory entry, basically.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
285:
Can I ask you, too, to mention some of the criteria that you believe are not met even though they should be?
317: 226: 52: 312: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
299:
as long as nobody can specify how it violates the Notability guideline. Seems notable to me.
193: 152: 148: 221: 255:
What would those criteria be? I am honestly curious. (and I did read the guidelines)
244: 128: 122: 107: 339: 300: 274: 214:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
189: 286: 256: 167: 350:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
103: 99: 95: 219:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 360:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 338:Apparently an important work in its niche. 178:Per above, would meet first criteria of 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 269:Doesn't establish notibility as per 164:Copyright in Historical Perspective 70:Copyright in Historical Perspective 62:Copyright in Historical Perspective 271:Knowledge (XXG):Notability_(books) 180:Knowledge (XXG):Notability_(books) 24: 156:mentioned the book very favorably 1: 145:plenty of articles and books 377: 311:seems to pass notability. 171:06:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 134:22:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 182:and possibly the fourth. 353:Please do not modify it. 162:at least one review for 149:some of our own articles 56:14:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 343:23:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 331:18:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 304:09:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 290:08:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 278:07:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 260:07:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 248:07:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 233:02:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 202:07:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 147:citing this work (plus 188:comment was added by 158:several times. There 329: 235: 205: 132: 368: 355: 315: 231: 218: 215: 183: 126: 111: 93: 48: 34: 376: 375: 371: 370: 369: 367: 366: 365: 364: 358:deletion review 351: 220: 213: 184:—The preceding 153:Lawrence Lessig 84: 68: 65: 46: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 374: 372: 363: 362: 346: 345: 333: 306: 294: 293: 292: 264: 263: 262: 237: 236: 217: 209: 208: 207: 206: 118: 117: 64: 59: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 373: 361: 359: 354: 348: 347: 344: 341: 337: 334: 332: 327: 323: 319: 314: 310: 307: 305: 302: 298: 295: 291: 288: 284: 281: 280: 279: 276: 272: 268: 265: 261: 258: 254: 251: 250: 249: 246: 242: 239: 238: 234: 230: 229: 225: 224: 216: 211: 210: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 181: 177: 174: 173: 172: 169: 165: 161: 157: 154: 150: 146: 141: 138: 137: 136: 135: 130: 125: 124: 115: 109: 105: 101: 97: 92: 88: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 66: 63: 60: 58: 57: 54: 53:Mailer Diablo 50: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 352: 349: 335: 313:TonyTheTiger 308: 296: 282: 266: 252: 240: 227: 222: 212: 175: 163: 159: 139: 121: 119: 45: 43: 31: 28: 245:Eusebeus 198:contribs 186:unsigned 114:View log 283:Comment 253:Comment 151:), and 87:protect 82:history 340:JulesH 301:Malc82 275:Dacium 267:Delete 241:Delete 228:scribe 190:Orphic 91:delete 129:Help! 108:views 100:watch 96:links 16:< 336:Keep 322:cont 318:talk 309:Keep 297:Keep 194:talk 176:Keep 140:Keep 104:logs 78:talk 74:edit 51:. - 326:bio 223:WjB 123:Guy 112:– ( 49:eep 287:Rl 273:-- 257:Rl 200:) 196:• 168:Rl 160:is 106:| 102:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 80:| 76:| 328:) 324:/ 320:/ 316:( 204:. 192:( 131:) 127:( 116:) 110:) 72:( 47:k

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Mailer Diablo
14:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Copyright in Historical Perspective
Copyright in Historical Perspective
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Guy
Help!
22:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
plenty of articles and books
some of our own articles
Lawrence Lessig
mentioned the book very favorably
Rl
06:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG):Notability_(books)
unsigned
Orphic
talk
contribs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.