60:
31:
652:
states: "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." These guys are thus notable. Having a radio program for years is what they are notable
275:
This article has been substantially revised since an initial deletion in
February of 2011. It now contains sources from several wide-circulation newspapers including the Oregonian, in addition to a story from the Associated Press. The show is nationally-recognized and more than worthy of inclusion on
593:
1. Cascadia.FM and cortandfatboy links are not appropriate as they are 1st person (the subject or their primary host). Other "references" consist of open blog entries, passing mentions to the fact that they were unceremoniously booted out, and other unreliable sources. The claimed buisnessweek piece
337:
mention Cort and Fatboy only in passing. The first story is in-depth about another show host with "KUFO's afternoon hosts, Cort and Fatboy, also were let go Friday." the only mention of the duo in the piece. The second story talks about a local
Lebowski Fest and only briefly mentions Cort and Fatboy
306:
has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." (emphasis mine) There are a couple of sources here about the duo's hosting of movie and TV screenings, including that oft-mentioned AP story where they're third or fourth billed in a story
657:
even mentions them. The guideline for entertainers and other people also states "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability". The fact that a major magazine as well as others mention them at all,
653:
for, not their website. One of the deletes mentions the guidelines for webpages for reasons unknown. These guys get coverage for their radio show, web show, themselves, and their parties. A major city newspaper covers their events regularly. They are seen as notable enough that
730:"If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability." (even assuming that
332:
The lack of URLs in most of the references made it initially more difficult to analyze the sourcing or for a reader to easily verify the claims made in the article. I've remedied that, where possible. In doing so, I've found that the two stories in
211:
172:
381:
205:
69:
594:
is an
Associated Press report so it can show up in 40 different locations with the exact same wording, but doesn't substantially talk about the article in principle.
358:
243:
40:
264:
866:
145:
140:
149:
17:
942:
875:
504:
They are notable enough to be mentioned, so they are notable. Other reliable sources speak of them as well, for various reasons.
132:
226:
193:
924:
94:
75:
46:
764:
741:
298:
lacks the in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources required to meet the notability standard. Criteria #1 of
187:
923:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
259:
93:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
625:
911:
855:
825:
790:
770:
747:
723:
695:
681:
640:
619:
603:
583:
567:
550:
527:
495:
424:
396:
373:
347:
324:
285:
270:
183:
114:
879:
871:
136:
420:
281:
233:
128:
120:
624:
BabbaQ, please link to the Policy document supporting your opinion. Otherwise all your opinion is
254:
251:
219:
731:
649:
407:
803:
786:
491:
343:
320:
865:
Cinematical has an extensive interview with Bobby Fatboy
Roberts about his music remix albums
832:
I changed your sig to be your name not mine. I think that's what you wanted it to look like.
757:
little evidence of depth of third-party coverage, particularly beyond local/routine coverage.
691:
636:
599:
563:
392:
369:
87:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
629:
440:
199:
889:
833:
701:
659:
615:
579:
546:
505:
442:
416:
277:
299:
111:
654:
475:
936:
779:
487:
436:
339:
316:
687:
632:
595:
559:
388:
365:
800:
Hats.com blog interviews Bobby Fatboy
Roberts and discusses show as well as hats.
166:
611:
575:
542:
760:
737:
686:
The article is about the show, not the two people. WP:PEOPLE does not apply.
410:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
106:. Consensus is fairly clear. Note the last two !votes were added by
700:
The two people are the show, so its the same thing in this case.
917:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
54:
25:
486:
finale party but does not discuss the program in any way. -
574:
No the sources are OK. No reason for deletion anyway.--
162:
158:
154:
107:
801:
218:
415:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
232:
610:Still, not in my opinion a reason for deletion.--
244:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review/Log/2011 March 18
97:). No further edits should be made to this page.
927:). No further edits should be made to this page.
382:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
8:
558:- The sources are trivial coverage at best.
380:Note: This debate has been included in the
357:Note: This debate has been included in the
474:: A mention is not sufficient to establish
379:
359:list of Radio-related deletion discussions
356:
541:- Not just local news coverage. Proven---
439:mentions them and talks to one of them.
435:It isn't just local news covering them.
74:For an explanation of the process, see
45:For an explanation of the process, see
311:finale, but none in-depth about their
478:, even in a notable publication. The
307:about fans hosting screenings of the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
70:deletion review on 2012 September 6
24:
888:Are you the same guy from above?
658:counts towards their notability.
58:
41:deletion review on 2011 April 10
29:
778:Mentions do not equal coverage
76:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1:
734:were the relevant criteria)
108:the same IP at the same time
868:19:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
482:article says they hosted a
959:
397:00:34, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
374:00:34, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
348:11:56, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
325:11:40, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
286:10:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
271:01:53, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
912:01:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
856:01:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
826:19:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
791:00:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
771:16:48, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
748:16:48, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
724:21:01, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
696:20:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
682:20:02, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
641:18:59, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
620:18:46, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
604:15:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
584:09:52, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
568:23:48, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
551:14:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
528:03:55, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
496:03:07, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
425:00:06, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
115:11:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
943:Pages at deletion review
920:Please do not modify it.
464:19:13, 1 April 2011 (UTC
90:Please do not modify it.
304:The content itself
102:The result was
874:comment added by
427:
399:
385:
376:
362:
276:Knowledge (XXG).
82:
81:
68:was subject to a
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
950:
922:
908:
905:
902:
899:
896:
893:
883:
852:
849:
846:
843:
840:
837:
822:
819:
816:
813:
810:
807:
784:
769:
746:
720:
717:
714:
711:
708:
705:
678:
675:
672:
669:
666:
663:
524:
521:
518:
515:
512:
509:
461:
458:
455:
452:
449:
446:
414:
412:
386:
363:
267:
262:
257:
237:
236:
222:
170:
152:
92:
62:
61:
55:
33:
32:
26:
958:
957:
953:
952:
951:
949:
948:
947:
933:
932:
931:
925:deletion review
918:
906:
903:
900:
897:
894:
891:
869:
850:
847:
844:
841:
838:
835:
820:
817:
814:
811:
808:
805:
780:
767:
758:
744:
735:
718:
715:
712:
709:
706:
703:
676:
673:
670:
667:
664:
661:
522:
519:
516:
513:
510:
507:
459:
456:
453:
450:
447:
444:
405:
265:
260:
255:
179:
143:
129:Cort and Fatboy
127:
124:
121:Cort and Fatboy
95:deletion review
88:
66:This discussion
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
956:
954:
946:
945:
935:
934:
930:
929:
914:
885:
884:
859:
858:
829:
828:
794:
793:
773:
763:
752:
751:
750:
740:
728:
727:
726:
655:Wired magazine
646:
645:
644:
643:
626:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
607:
606:
587:
586:
571:
570:
553:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
499:
498:
466:
465:
429:
428:
413:
402:
401:
400:
377:
353:
352:
351:
350:
242:Relisting per
240:
239:
176:
123:
118:
100:
99:
83:
80:
79:
73:
63:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
955:
944:
941:
940:
938:
928:
926:
921:
915:
913:
910:
909:
887:
886:
881:
877:
873:
867:
864:
861:
860:
857:
854:
853:
831:
830:
827:
824:
823:
802:
799:
796:
795:
792:
788:
785:
783:
777:
774:
772:
768:
766:
762:
756:
753:
749:
745:
743:
739:
733:
729:
725:
722:
721:
699:
698:
697:
693:
689:
685:
684:
683:
680:
679:
656:
651:
648:
647:
642:
638:
634:
631:
627:
623:
622:
621:
617:
613:
609:
608:
605:
601:
597:
592:
589:
588:
585:
581:
577:
573:
572:
569:
565:
561:
557:
554:
552:
548:
544:
540:
537:
536:
529:
526:
525:
503:
502:
501:
500:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
480:Business Week
477:
473:
470:
469:
468:
467:
463:
462:
441:
438:
437:Business Week
434:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
411:
409:
404:
403:
398:
394:
390:
383:
378:
375:
371:
367:
360:
355:
354:
349:
345:
341:
336:
335:The Oregonian
331:
328:
327:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
305:
301:
297:
293:
290:
289:
288:
287:
283:
279:
273:
272:
268:
263:
258:
253:
249:
245:
235:
231:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
185:
182:
181:Find sources:
177:
174:
168:
164:
160:
156:
151:
147:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
125:
122:
119:
117:
116:
113:
109:
105:
98:
96:
91:
85:
84:
77:
71:
67:
64:
57:
56:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
919:
916:
890:
862:
834:
804:
797:
781:
775:
759:
754:
736:
702:
660:
590:
555:
538:
506:
483:
479:
471:
443:
432:
406:
338:as hosts. -
334:
329:
312:
308:
303:
296:as a podcast
295:
291:
274:
247:
241:
229:
223:
215:
208:
202:
196:
190:
180:
103:
101:
89:
86:
65:
36:
876:67.51.70.18
870:—Preceding
417:Ron Ritzman
294:as subject
278:Stumptowner
206:free images
782:ArcAngel
476:notability
315:itself. -
112:Courcelles
732:WP:PEOPLE
650:WP:PEOPLE
389:• Gene93k
366:• Gene93k
302:begins: "
937:Category
872:unsigned
488:Dravecky
408:Relisted
340:Dravecky
317:Dravecky
173:View log
776:Delete.
755:Delete:
688:Jarkeld
633:Hasteur
630:WP:IDHT
596:Hasteur
560:Jarkeld
472:Comment
252:King of
248:abstain
212:WP refs
200:scholar
146:protect
141:history
787:(talk)
612:BabbaQ
591:Delete
576:BabbaQ
556:Delete
543:BabbaQ
300:WP:WEB
292:Delete
184:Google
150:delete
104:delete
907:Focus
851:Focus
765:Stalk
761:Hrafn
742:Stalk
738:Hrafn
719:Focus
677:Focus
523:Focus
460:Focus
330:Note:
227:JSTOR
188:books
167:views
159:watch
155:links
16:<
880:talk
863:Keep
798:Keep
692:talk
637:talk
628:and
616:talk
600:talk
580:talk
564:talk
547:talk
539:Keep
492:talk
484:Lost
433:Keep
421:talk
393:talk
370:talk
344:talk
321:talk
313:show
309:Lost
282:talk
246:. I
220:FENS
194:news
163:logs
137:talk
133:edit
387:--
364:--
234:TWL
171:– (
110:.
939::
882:)
789:)
694:)
639:)
618:)
602:)
582:)
566:)
549:)
494:)
423:)
395:)
384:.
372:)
361:.
346:)
323:)
284:)
269:♠
250:.
214:)
165:|
161:|
157:|
153:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
72:.
43:.
904:m
901:a
898:e
895:r
892:D
878:(
848:m
845:a
842:e
839:r
836:D
821:w
818:e
815:i
812:d
809:u
806:K
716:m
713:a
710:e
707:r
704:D
690:(
674:m
671:a
668:e
665:r
662:D
635:(
614:(
598:(
578:(
562:(
545:(
520:m
517:a
514:e
511:r
508:D
490:(
457:m
454:a
451:e
448:r
445:D
419:(
391:(
368:(
342:(
319:(
280:(
266:♣
261:♦
256:♥
238:)
230:·
224:·
216:·
209:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
186:(
178:(
175:)
169:)
131:(
78:.
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.