342:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting
319:. Redirecting non-notable articles to Listings of a subject which has been found to be non-notable is absurd. Playmate-hood, being inherently non-notable, does not prop up this article, nor can it prop up a List of playmates. Redirecting to non-notable lists only makes work for Admins who will have to delete these redirects later. Also, significantly, this is an inadequately-sourced BLP in a controversial area.
476:- playmate of the month, makeup artist, claimed by a plastic surgery site as an entreprenuer, attended a comic convention and was photographed. I can see this information but little of it from reliable sources. Noone cares to write about her extensively and there is grossy insufficient material to support a biographical article -
347:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
346:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern
Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
310:
This should have been done after consensus determined
Playmate-hood's non-notability. Other projects can cover this material, Knowledge (XXG) consensus has determined that Knowledge (XXG) is not that project. Should sourcing and claim of notability sufficient for Knowledge (XXG) later be found, the
201:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by
Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
274:. Does not appear to be enough nontrivial reliably sourced content to justify an independent article. This has been the outcome of most recent AFD discussions for less prominent Playmates as well the way most recently named Playmates have been handled.
162:
244:
338:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of
156:
123:
224:
96:
91:
221:
100:
17:
271:
83:
59:
279:
177:
144:
343:
498:
36:
392:
275:
138:
351:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
497:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
483:
468:
444:
424:
400:
365:
328:
300:
283:
259:
236:
213:
65:
134:
87:
385:
184:
354:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
415:. No inherent notability just from being a Playmate, and no independent and reliable sources cited.
480:
324:
170:
375:
339:
461:
361:
296:
255:
232:
150:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
420:
79:
71:
412:
348:
207:
477:
320:
49:
349:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
456:
437:
432:
as this editor is banned from BLP editing, yet nominated over 100 BLPs for deletion.
357:
292:
251:
228:
117:
416:
206:
are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the general notability criteria.
378:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
193:
Being a
Playboy playmate does not makes you notable. Being chosen
491:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
452:
Nomination was made in violation of a still active topic ban
245:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
453:
433:
113:
109:
105:
169:
383:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
183:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
501:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
243:Note: This debate has been included in the
242:
220:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
272:List of Playboy Playmates of 1982
1:
311:article can be re-started.
518:
329:19:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
301:14:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
284:02:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
260:01:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
237:01:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
214:00:59, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
494:Please do not modify it.
484:12:29, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
469:02:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
445:02:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
202:solely related to their
66:15:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
425:15:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
401:03:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
366:14:28, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
222:WikiProject Pornography
276:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
195:Playmate of the Month
199:Playmate of the Year
291:as per Hullaballoo
344:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT
61:Operation Big Bear
44:The result was
466:
443:
403:
356:
262:
248:
225:list of deletions
211:
509:
496:
462:
459:
442:
399:
397:
390:
382:
380:
352:
249:
239:
209:
188:
187:
173:
121:
103:
80:Cathy St. George
72:Cathy St. George
62:
56:
34:
517:
516:
512:
511:
510:
508:
507:
506:
505:
499:deletion review
492:
465:
457:
450:Procedural Keep
393:
386:
384:
373:
336:Procedural Keep
219:
130:
94:
78:
75:
64:
60:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
515:
513:
504:
503:
487:
486:
471:
463:
447:
427:
405:
404:
381:
370:
369:
368:
332:
331:
304:
303:
286:
264:
263:
240:
191:
190:
127:
74:
69:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
514:
502:
500:
495:
489:
488:
485:
482:
479:
475:
472:
470:
467:
460:
454:
451:
448:
446:
440:
439:
434:
431:
428:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
407:
406:
402:
398:
396:
391:
389:
379:
377:
372:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
350:
345:
341:
337:
334:
333:
330:
326:
322:
318:
316:
309:
306:
305:
302:
298:
294:
290:
287:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
266:
265:
261:
257:
253:
246:
241:
238:
234:
230:
226:
223:
218:
217:
216:
215:
212:
205:
200:
196:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
57:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
493:
490:
473:
449:
436:
429:
408:
394:
387:
374:
353:
335:
314:
312:
307:
288:
267:
204:playmatehood
203:
198:
194:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
52:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
157:free images
478:Peripitus
340:WP:BEFORE
321:Dekkappai
252:• Gene93k
229:• Gene93k
53:Wizardman
438:Milowent
388:Baseball
376:Relisted
317:redirect
289:Redirect
268:Redirect
124:View log
395:Watcher
358:Carrite
293:Hasteur
208:Damiens
163:WP refs
151:scholar
97:protect
92:history
481:(Talk)
474:Delete
417:Edison
413:WP:BIO
411:Fails
409:Delete
308:Delete
135:Google
101:delete
46:delete
458:Monty
178:JSTOR
139:books
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
430:Keep
421:talk
362:talk
325:talk
297:talk
280:talk
256:talk
233:talk
171:FENS
145:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
464:845
435:.--
315:NOT
313:Do
270:to
250:--
210:.rf
197:or
185:TWL
122:– (
455:.
441:•
423:)
364:)
327:)
299:)
282:)
258:)
247:.
235:)
227:.
165:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
48:.
419:(
360:(
323:(
295:(
278:(
254:(
231:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
120:)
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.