215:. Being a person who calls into a local radio show is not evidence of notability, especially since we don't even have full names for these people. Very poorly referenced and even without full names provided, claims about the behavior of certain callers, such as one labelled as intoxicated, cause concern for me under
139:
the stand-alone article. The information was split from the main WFAN article, and has since been replaced there. The information, however, is very notable as several WFAN callers have become as popular as the station's hosts (and one former caller became a host hiimself). Perhaps the list can be
193:
with apologies to John from Sandy Hook, et al. While the WFAN article can include whatever its editors want, we don't need articles about callers to any radio program. It reminds me of the front page story in
114:
178:. Pair it down if you want, but this should remain in the main article. Not all of those callers are notable in the way Rollosmokes describes. -
87:
82:
91:
17:
74:
121:
This article appears to be a case of listcruft, stringing together a list of non-notable callers to various radio shows.
243:
36:
242:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
228:
207:
185:
183:
170:
149:
130:
56:
198:
about the Ohio forklift operator who was going to deliver a nationwide address on the Rush
Limbaugh show.
78:
166:
145:
126:
70:
62:
203:
224:
179:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
162:
141:
216:
122:
199:
220:
49:
108:
195:
140:
pared down, but its inclusion is very important to the article as a whole.
236:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
104:
100:
96:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
246:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
229:19:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
208:18:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
186:15:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
171:12:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
150:07:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
131:06:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
57:01:10, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
263:
239:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
254:
241:
112:
94:
54:
34:
262:
261:
257:
256:
255:
253:
252:
251:
250:
244:deletion review
237:
85:
71:Callers of WFAN
69:
66:
63:Callers of WFAN
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
260:
258:
249:
248:
232:
231:
210:
188:
173:
152:
119:
118:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
259:
247:
245:
240:
234:
233:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
209:
205:
201:
197:
192:
189:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
155:Strong Delete
153:
151:
147:
143:
138:
135:
134:
133:
132:
128:
124:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
238:
235:
212:
190:
175:
158:
157:Should be a
154:
136:
120:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
163:scope_creep
142:Rollosmokes
123:SchuminWeb
200:Mandsford
196:The Onion
221:23skidoo
115:View log
88:protect
83:history
52:JForget
217:WP:BLP
213:Delete
191:Delete
176:Delete
159:Speedy
137:Delete
92:delete
46:delete
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
225:talk
204:talk
167:talk
146:talk
127:Talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
180:Mgm
113:– (
227:)
219:.
206:)
169:)
161:.
148:)
129:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:--
223:(
202:(
182:|
165:(
144:(
125:(
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.