286:
point 3 (for films), all establishing that wining a major award is grounds for notability in those fields. I would contend that this shows a consensus that a major award is grounds for establishing notability in any similar field, which would include
Computer Games. The IGF China 2009 Best Game Award
229:. It isn't a role-playing game, more of a "Shooter", and it has won a "best game" award at China's first indie game festival. Several references have been added, more soon. Thank you for considering keeping it. Tell me if you have any other concerns. -Hurtz
363:. Although the game is not particularly well known outside the independent games community, it won the highest award at IGF China and it is likely that it will only become more notable as future titles in the series are released.
153:
323:
sorry, I'm not an administrator, so I can't delete it or anything, just nominate. And Hurtz, I only called it an indie RPG because that is what the article said. I'm sticking to my nom as of now, though. Regards,
235:
won a new, but real award from a 3rd party. Only worth $ 2,500, but still. A news report of some sort about the award or a review of the game in a reliable source (in
Chinese is fine) would help here.
48:. The reasons given by the editors favouring deleting were plausible and not contested by the editors favouring retention and vice versa. As such, I find no consensus in this discussion.
114:
147:
344:. This game is quite notable in the indie community, and one of the most ground-breaking games to come along in a while. I quite willingly paid money for it.
87:
82:
91:
382:. Mods, we would like to hear your opinion so we can get this tag removed and start expanding a bit more on the article! Thanks!
74:
17:
168:
135:
444:
129:
36:
443:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
429:
410:
391:
372:
353:
332:
315:
296:
264:
245:
219:
195:
185:
125:
56:
387:
311:
260:
175:
406:
368:
364:
78:
421:
425:
345:
213:
161:
349:
383:
307:
292:
283:
256:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
141:
325:
188:
402:
241:
70:
62:
206:
49:
275:
288:
279:
108:
237:
274:. While we don't have a policy specifically for computer games we do have
437:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
306:. Thank you, Elfwood. Waiting for your approval, Airplaneman...
104:
100:
96:
160:
204:. Non-notable as far as context goes, no references.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
447:). No further edits should be made to this page.
174:
8:
287:qualifys as a major award in my opinion. --
401:no outside indications of notability.
7:
255:. This better? Best I could get...
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
333:23:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
316:21:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
297:16:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
265:21:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
246:03:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
220:21:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
196:21:10, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
430:03:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
411:14:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
392:00:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
373:21:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
354:07:27, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
57:07:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
464:
440:Please do not modify it.
282:point 2 (for books) and
278:point 3 (for websites),
32:Please do not modify it.
186:indie role-playing game
44:The result was
455:
442:
328:
218:
216:
210:
191:
179:
178:
164:
112:
94:
54:
53:
34:
463:
462:
458:
457:
456:
454:
453:
452:
451:
445:deletion review
438:
326:
214:
208:
205:
189:
121:
85:
71:Captain forever
69:
66:
63:Captain forever
51:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
461:
459:
450:
449:
433:
432:
414:
413:
395:
394:
376:
375:
357:
356:
338:
337:
336:
335:
300:
299:
268:
267:
249:
248:
230:
223:
222:
182:
181:
118:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
460:
448:
446:
441:
435:
434:
431:
427:
423:
420:per Elfwood.
419:
416:
415:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
396:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:
377:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
358:
355:
351:
347:
343:
340:
339:
334:
331:
329:
322:
319:
318:
317:
313:
309:
305:
302:
301:
298:
294:
290:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
251:
250:
247:
243:
239:
234:
231:
228:
225:
224:
221:
217:
212:
211:
203:
200:
199:
198:
197:
194:
192:
187:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
119:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
439:
436:
417:
398:
384:Editinghurts
379:
360:
341:
330:
320:
308:Editinghurts
303:
271:
257:Editinghurts
252:
232:
226:
207:
201:
193:
184:Non-notable
183:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
327:Airplaneman
190:Airplaneman
148:free images
403:Shadowjams
365:WikiSolved
284:WP:NOTFILM
209:IShadowed
52:Skomorokh
422:Vulture19
233:weak keep
346:Tidegear
115:View log
321:Comment
289:Elfwood
154:WP refs
142:scholar
88:protect
83:history
399:Delete
304:Agreed
276:WP:WEB
202:Delete
126:Google
92:delete
280:WP:BK
253:Fixed
238:Hobit
227:Don't
169:JSTOR
130:books
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
426:talk
418:Keep
407:talk
388:talk
369:talk
361:Keep
350:talk
342:Keep
312:talk
293:talk
272:Keep
261:talk
242:talk
162:FENS
136:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
176:TWL
113:– (
428:)
409:)
390:)
380:Ok
371:)
352:)
314:)
295:)
263:)
244:)
215:✰
156:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
424:(
405:(
386:(
367:(
348:(
310:(
291:(
259:(
240:(
180:)
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
120:(
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.