Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Egan - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

217:
Lexis-nexis produces about 200 articles for her name, most of which have her as the pro-choice advocate to be quoted during the abortion wars of the 80s and 90s. For an article about her, see Sandy Naiman, "For Egan, life's all about choice", The Toronto Sun, May 18, 2000, Final edition, p. 75. (I
152:
In the second page and farther in the google result pages, there also appear to be a lot of left (listen to what this person is doing!) and right (careful, we've got an activist around) press releases and biased stories about Carolyn Egan's campaign against Steven Harper. I don't know enough about
137:
Only 700 google hits for "Carolyn Egan", many of which are for other people with the same name. However, one actual commentary from CBC mentions an award this Carolyn Egan got (no date on the award though). Interestingly, this source talks mostly about how good it is for "behind the scenes" type
249:, and not know who Carolyn Egan is. If somebody who lived in this country and was involved in the political process in any significant way said they'd never heard of her, I'd find that about as believable as if they'd never heard of 138:
people to get awards; is it a signal of notability to have a article about you talking about how sad it is that no-one knows who you are? I need to know more before I have an opinion on this, but this article
286:
or on any other policy or guideline. I've also heard the name before, hence my taking the time to look for other info, but for the life of me fail to see how this article meets the
112: 184:
though I disagree with her politics mostly, pretty damn notable persyn on the left in Kanada and particularly in Ontario. Very active with steelworkers and the Trotskyite I.S. --
153:
canadian politics to know what's a good source and what isn't, but I'm starting to suspect that there might, indeed, be multiple non-biased sources about Carolyn Egan.
169: 312:
She is in the news sometimes for her abortion rights campaigning. For example, the New York Times has a subscription-only article with her
204:
doesn't really bring up anything useful to persuade me otherwise. If reliable sources and BIO criteria are added, I could easily be swayed.
17: 278:
I sure hope you're not calling other editors ignorant (or worse), because it is coming across that way. "I heard of this person" is
85: 80: 89: 245:
I can state categorically that it's virtually impossible to be even remotely connected to Canadian politics, even only as an
201: 72: 396: 36: 313: 395:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
381: 369: 357: 331: 319: 302: 273: 236: 208: 188: 175: 157: 145: 123: 54: 120: 76: 366: 139: 265:
answer to that statement would be "bull freaking shit, dude". She's entirely notable enough, IME;
68: 60: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
283: 197: 340: 219: 218:
quick glance suggests to me that it is the source of much of the detail in the article.)
50: 295: 291: 378: 328: 316: 299: 258: 250: 205: 270: 185: 106: 254: 172: 154: 142: 377:
per Bearcat, and we ought to note that the Google test is US-centric. --
48:; I would recommend finding sources for this article, however. Cheers, 389:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
298:. At present, the article still fails to meet any of these. 102: 98: 94: 129:
Definately not local with the "awards" she has won.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 196:. Can find nothing that really meets criteria of 168:This discussion has been included in the list of 399:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 119:No sources, non-notable local activist. 269:. I'll work on improving the sources. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 170:Canadian candidates for deletion 1: 382:22:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 370:22:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 358:04:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 332:02:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 320:05:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 303:20:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 274:01:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 237:04:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 209:00:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 189:00:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 176:08:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 158:07:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 146:07:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 124:21:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 55:06:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 416: 290:we have in place (such as 282:an inclusion criterion on 365:per Bearcat (or worse). 392:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 261:— that is, the only 141:might be helpful. 178: 407: 394: 355: 349: 345: 327:, per Bearcat. 234: 228: 224: 194:Very Weak Delete 164: 110: 92: 34: 415: 414: 410: 409: 408: 406: 405: 404: 403: 397:deletion review 390: 367:Static Universe 351: 347: 341: 230: 226: 220: 83: 67: 64: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 413: 411: 402: 401: 385: 384: 372: 360: 334: 322: 307: 306: 305: 242: 241: 240: 239: 212: 211: 200:. Combing the 191: 179: 161: 160: 149: 148: 131: 130: 117: 116: 63: 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 412: 400: 398: 393: 387: 386: 383: 380: 376: 373: 371: 368: 364: 361: 359: 356: 354: 350: 344: 338: 335: 333: 330: 326: 323: 321: 318: 314: 311: 308: 304: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 276: 275: 272: 268: 264: 260: 259:Michael Coren 256: 252: 251:June Callwood 248: 244: 243: 238: 235: 233: 229: 223: 216: 215: 214: 213: 210: 207: 203: 199: 195: 192: 190: 187: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 167: 163: 162: 159: 156: 151: 150: 147: 144: 140: 136: 133: 132: 128: 127: 126: 125: 122: 114: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65: 62: 59: 57: 56: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 391: 388: 374: 362: 352: 346: 342: 336: 324: 309: 287: 279: 266: 262: 246: 231: 225: 221: 193: 181: 165: 134: 121:General Idea 118: 69:Carolyn Egan 61:Carolyn Egan 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 255:Judy Rebick 51:Yuser31415 379:lquilter 329:CJCurrie 317:Oakshade 300:Agent 86 288:policies 263:possible 247:observer 206:Agent 86 113:View log 271:Bearcat 186:Mista-X 135:Comment 86:protect 81:history 284:WP:BIO 198:WP:BIO 90:delete 296:WP:RS 202:ghits 173:Enuja 155:Enuja 143:Enuja 107:views 99:watch 95:links 16:< 375:Keep 363:Keep 343:Buck 339:. 337:Keep 325:Keep 310:Keep 294:and 292:WP:V 267:keep 222:Buck 182:keep 166:Note 103:logs 77:talk 73:edit 46:Keep 353:ofg 348:ets 315:.-- 280:not 257:or 232:ofg 227:ets 111:- ( 253:, 105:| 101:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 79:| 75:| 115:) 109:) 71:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Yuser31415
06:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Carolyn Egan
Carolyn Egan
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
General Idea
21:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Enuja
07:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Enuja
07:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Canadian candidates for deletion
Enuja
08:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Mista-X
00:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
WP:BIO
ghits

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.