422:
each. Even in the most citation-heavy biomedical sciences, that's an excellent record. I don't think we've ever held that someone with two or more papers with over 100 citations each did not meet WP:PROF, The nom sees no indication of meeting WP:PROF, but I think that is due to the tone of the article. If we want to delete for promotionalism, that would be another matter, but in this case it is easily fixable and I'm doing that right now. (I do not think we should pay attention to claims of "easily fixed" unless the person making the claims or someone else interested is actually prepared to fix them.;)
238:#1, depending on the numbers one uses as a standard. No doubt, this guy has put a lot of effort into self-promotion, but it seems like he's been successful at it, and we're not in a position to judge whether the attention he's received is deserved. The article still has major NPOV problems, but I'm not sure we can delete on that basis. —
421:
Clearly and unambiguously meets WP:PROF. In fields where journal articles are the primary means of communication, the influence of an individual as recognized by their peers is shown by citations. He had citations counts of 265, 182, 162, 145, 135, 123, 68, ... That's 6papers with over 100 citations
166:
379:
301:
340:
119:
231:
160:
206:
126:
17:
227:
92:
87:
96:
181:
148:
79:
277:
253:
452:
40:
142:
383:
344:
305:
197:
Despite numerous biographies from associated organizations, there is no indication that this person meets
448:
288:
264:
36:
138:
433:
410:
371:
332:
292:
268:
244:
220:
61:
235:
174:
188:
202:
215:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
447:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
57:
83:
154:
429:
198:
210:
113:
53:
75:
67:
239:
424:
205:. That the article reads like his PR person wrote it doesn't help.
441:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
380:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
280:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
256:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
302:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
109:
105:
101:
173:
341:
286:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
262:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
455:). No further edits should be made to this page.
187:
8:
378:Note: This debate has been included in the
339:Note: This debate has been included in the
300:Note: This debate has been included in the
377:
338:
299:
7:
24:
228:Google Scholar citation numbers
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
434:04:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
62:15:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
411:11:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
372:11:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
333:11:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
293:07:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
269:15:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
245:15:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
221:21:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
472:
444:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
234:may suggest meeting
209:was no consensus.
413:
403:
400:
394:
388:
374:
364:
361:
355:
349:
335:
325:
322:
316:
310:
295:
271:
232:Google Books hits
219:
463:
446:
407:
401:
398:
392:
386:
368:
362:
359:
353:
347:
329:
323:
320:
314:
308:
291:
285:
283:
281:
267:
261:
259:
257:
213:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
471:
470:
466:
465:
464:
462:
461:
460:
459:
453:deletion review
442:
406:
397:
391:
385:
367:
358:
352:
346:
328:
319:
313:
307:
296:
287:
276:
274:
272:
263:
252:
250:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
469:
467:
458:
457:
437:
436:
415:
414:
404:
395:
389:
375:
365:
356:
350:
336:
326:
317:
311:
284:
273:
260:
249:
248:
247:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
468:
456:
454:
450:
445:
439:
438:
435:
431:
427:
426:
420:
417:
416:
412:
409:
408:
381:
376:
373:
370:
369:
342:
337:
334:
331:
330:
303:
298:
297:
294:
290:
289:North America
282:
279:
270:
266:
265:North America
258:
255:
246:
243:
242:
237:
233:
229:
225:
224:
223:
222:
217:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
443:
440:
423:
418:
384:
345:
306:
275:
251:
240:
236:WP:NACADEMIC
207:Previous AFD
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
203:WP:ACADEMIC
161:free images
76:Carl Marci
68:Carl Marci
449:talk page
226:Comment:
37:talk page
451:or in a
278:Relisted
254:Relisted
120:View log
39:or in a
211:Toddst1
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
199:WP:GNG
139:Google
97:delete
54:Kurykh
430:talk
419:Keep.
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
241:swpb
230:and
216:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
425:DGG
201:or
189:TWL
118:– (
52:.
432:)
405:S
402:E
399:A
396:S
393:K
390:C
387:E
382:.
366:S
363:E
360:A
357:S
354:K
351:C
348:E
343:.
327:S
324:E
321:A
318:S
315:K
312:C
309:E
304:.
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
428:(
218:)
214:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.