220:. She has never won an election nor held an office. Most of her article is about her repeated failures to get a tax cut passed. The rationale for keep in first nomination (back in 2005) ranged from no reasons whatsoever to one anonymous claim that "she was a major player in politics" (which is not supported by sources), another claiming that the tax initiative was notable (only for repeated failure), and one that 5000 GHits was good enough for notability (current searches past #10 start to hit her FB and Twitter, a YouTube spoof she did, etc. Obviously hit counts do not equal reliable and independent coverage). She therefore does not meet the local criterion either.
337:
I see no significant coverage (other than the Boston Globe editorial which talks about the other two candidates being awful as a reason to endorse her) and the other criteria aren't there either: Howell's runs for office were unsuccessful by large margins and the initiatives she helped with failed as
238:
not as a politician, but as an activist and organizer who has a well-established reputation in
Massachusetts. Take a look at Google News and Google Books, both of which show that she's received in-depth coverage for many years. Many Boston Globe stories (hidden behind pay walls, unfortunately), but
185:
86:
81:
313:
290:. Although not a major political figure, she appears to receive a fair amount of coverage every two to four years in Massachusetts. In addition to the news and book hits, I found a
141:
258:
179:
76:
385:
per
Location. The subject has received coverage in numerous articles over the past few years as a Libertarian candidate and anti-tax activist. --
17:
114:
109:
426:
409:
392:
374:
347:
328:
303:
273:
248:
229:
118:
59:
400:
per
Location. She is evidently well-publicised in Massachusetts. It's not surprising when fringe candidates for office fail.
200:
101:
167:
441:
36:
269:
440:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
389:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
161:
283:
217:
157:
370:
265:
207:
422:
386:
244:
193:
146:
357:
299:
343:
324:
225:
105:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
405:
366:
287:
173:
291:
418:
240:
55:
295:
339:
320:
221:
97:
65:
135:
401:
360:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
50:
239:
the snippets visible indicate that the coverage has been substantial.
434:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
338:
well. The mention in the ballot initiative article is enough.
131:
127:
123:
192:
365:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
206:
87:
Articles for deletion/Carla Howell (3rd nomination)
82:
Articles for deletion/Carla Howell (2nd nomination)
314:list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
444:). No further edits should be made to this page.
259:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
8:
308:
253:
417:per Cullen328 and Location. Meets GNG. --
312:: This debate has been included in the
257:: This debate has been included in the
74:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
72:
77:Articles for deletion/Carla Howell
24:
1:
304:21:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
274:19:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
249:06:42, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
230:05:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
427:19:06, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
410:10:04, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
393:04:52, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
375:00:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
348:00:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
329:01:51, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
60:07:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
461:
437:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
71:AfDs for this article:
292:Glenn Beck interview
44:The result was
377:
331:
317:
276:
262:
452:
439:
364:
362:
318:
263:
211:
210:
196:
149:
139:
121:
34:
460:
459:
455:
454:
453:
451:
450:
449:
448:
442:deletion review
435:
355:
266:Jclemens-public
153:
145:
112:
96:
93:
91:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
458:
456:
447:
446:
430:
429:
412:
395:
387:Metropolitan90
379:
378:
363:
352:
351:
350:
332:
306:
277:
251:
216:Does not meet
214:
213:
150:
147:Afd statistics
92:
90:
89:
84:
79:
73:
70:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
457:
445:
443:
438:
432:
431:
428:
424:
420:
416:
413:
411:
407:
403:
399:
396:
394:
391:
388:
384:
381:
380:
376:
372:
368:
361:
359:
354:
353:
349:
345:
341:
336:
333:
330:
326:
322:
315:
311:
307:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
284:WP:POLITICIAN
281:
278:
275:
271:
267:
260:
256:
252:
250:
246:
242:
237:
234:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:WP:POLITICIAN
209:
205:
202:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
159:
156:
155:Find sources:
151:
148:
143:
137:
133:
129:
125:
120:
116:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:
88:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
436:
433:
414:
397:
382:
356:
334:
309:
286:, but meets
279:
254:
235:
215:
203:
197:
189:
182:
176:
170:
164:
154:
98:Carla Howell
66:Carla Howell
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
367:Ron Ritzman
180:free images
419:JayJasper
321:• Gene93k
241:Cullen328
358:Relisted
296:Location
282:. Fails
142:View log
340:Hekerui
222:MSJapan
186:WP refs
174:scholar
115:protect
110:history
402:Occuli
390:(talk)
335:Delete
288:WP:GNG
158:Google
119:delete
201:JSTOR
162:books
144:) •
136:views
128:watch
124:links
48:. --
16:<
423:talk
415:Keep
406:talk
398:Keep
383:Keep
371:talk
344:talk
325:talk
310:Note
300:talk
280:Keep
270:talk
255:Note
245:talk
236:Keep
226:talk
194:FENS
168:news
132:logs
106:talk
102:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
46:keep
319:--
264:--
208:TWL
140:– (
425:)
408:)
373:)
346:)
327:)
316:.
302:)
294:.
272:)
261:.
247:)
228:)
188:)
134:|
130:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
58:)
421:(
404:(
369:(
342:(
323:(
298:(
268:(
243:(
224:(
212:)
204:·
198:·
190:·
183:·
177:·
171:·
165:·
160:(
152:(
138:)
100:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.