291:). The only one with any claim to be a mainstream refereed journal is Int. J. Theor. Phys., and that one has attracted citations only from Carmeli himself and his coauthors---and the citations are nowhere except, again, the ArXiV, Foundations of Physics again, "Creation" (!!), and ITJP again. If this were a notable theory, you'd be seeing citations from review articles, observers, etc., in journals like ApJ.
286:
Let me comment on that. I did a search like this before AfD'ing. Note that several of these are well-known fringe/crackpot journals (Foundations of
Physics Letters), and several more are unpublished ArXiV preprints or unrefereed conference talks (see
158:
119:
152:
92:
87:
96:
79:
217:
209:
173:
140:
322:
300:
277:
255:
232:
61:
288:
244:
134:
272:
130:
17:
83:
180:
75:
67:
339:
146:
36:
338:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
269:
166:
318:
251:
228:
192:. Describes a one-author theory with virtually no citations in the mainstream literature.
56:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
296:
205:
197:
189:
264:
314:
306:
247:
224:
50:
113:
292:
201:
193:
289:
Knowledge:Reliable_source_examples#arXiv_preprints_and_conference_abstracts
313:
press, just not enough to pass WP:FRINGE. This is a borderline case.
332:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
105:
101:
165:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
342:). No further edits should be made to this page.
179:
8:
218:list of Science-related deletion discussions
216:Note: This debate has been included in the
215:
305:Let me be clear, too: the theory is pure
66:
7:
24:
76:Carmeli's cosmological relativity
68:Carmeli's cosmological relativity
243:- not entirely non-notable, see
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
200:) 19:59, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
359:
323:20:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
301:23:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
278:20:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
263:per Bearian's evidence. --
256:20:42, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
233:15:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
210:19:59, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
62:02:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
335:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
273:egg-throwing coleslaw?
309:, but it has gotten
48:, however weakly.
276:
235:
221:
350:
337:
267:
222:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
44:The result was
34:
358:
357:
353:
352:
351:
349:
348:
347:
346:
340:deletion review
333:
126:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
356:
354:
345:
344:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
281:
280:
258:
237:
236:
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
355:
343:
341:
336:
330:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
303:
302:
298:
294:
290:
285:
284:
283:
282:
279:
274:
271:
266:
262:
259:
257:
253:
249:
245:
242:
239:
238:
234:
230:
226:
219:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
64:
63:
59:
58:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
334:
331:
310:
307:junk science
260:
240:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
55:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
261:Weak delete
241:Weak delete
153:free images
265:Slgrandson
225:• Gene93k
190:WP:FRINGE
270:How's my
120:View log
315:Bearian
248:Bearian
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
51:postdlf
293:Bm gub
202:Bm gub
194:Bm gub
131:Google
97:delete
46:DELETE
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
319:talk
311:some
297:talk
252:talk
229:talk
206:talk
198:talk
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
57:talk
223:--
181:TWL
118:– (
321:)
299:)
254:)
246:.
231:)
220:.
208:)
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
317:(
295:(
275:)
268:(
250:(
227:(
204:(
196:(
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.