282:
205:
Contested prod. For the current references in the article as of nomination, the first three are self-published sources, the fourth is a blog, and the fifth does not even mention, let alone cover in any depth, the article subject. I've searched for better references, and expected it to at least be
174:
308:
based on the roster of notable artists. Unless someone can point me to a notability guideline for record labels that says otherwise, I will assume that having several notable artists on a label makes a label
168:
242:
127:
260:
287:, and several other briefer mentions. Not in-depth coverage by any means, but I think it's a shame if a significant-enough label can't be covered here (satisfying
224:
134:
100:
95:
104:
87:
285:
447:
408:
319:
363:, who also said that "just releasing notable records doesn't make the label notable" and that articles about labels do need to meet
189:
156:
17:
53:
150:
511:
40:
484:
464:
425:
386:
336:
300:
270:
252:
234:
216:
69:
146:
91:
481:
443:
404:
383:
371:
to be notable. That said, I added multiple sources to the article already that I think are enough to meet
356:
315:
267:
249:
231:
196:
507:
83:
75:
36:
352:
182:
281:. Clearly a significant label with a roster of notable artists. There are sources out there, e.g.
211:
63:
162:
437:, are you aware you are suppose to state support or oppose in bold to make a clear statement.--
478:
455:
438:
434:
416:
399:
395:
380:
348:
327:
310:
264:
246:
228:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
506:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
459:
420:
331:
296:
473:
Yes, sorry, I've been busy lately. I think this article should be kept and therefore vote
451:
412:
376:
368:
323:
206:
possible to find some, but have come up entirely empty. Accordingly, I believe that we
372:
364:
58:
121:
292:
288:
207:
360:
500:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
208:
do not have any reference material to sustain this article
117:
113:
109:
181:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
514:). No further edits should be made to this page.
398:, Please voice an opinion in this discussion?--
243:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
261:list of Illinois-related deletion discussions
195:
8:
259:Note: This debate has been included in the
241:Note: This debate has been included in the
223:Note: This debate has been included in the
258:
240:
225:list of Music-related deletion discussions
222:
291:) because of a guideline like GNG. --
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
351:, I raised this question on
531:
485:18:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
465:14:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
426:12:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
387:01:23, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
337:19:05, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
301:06:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
271:03:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
253:03:35, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
235:03:34, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
217:02:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
70:02:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
503:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
355:and was directed to
84:Carrot Top Records
76:Carrot Top Records
463:
424:
335:
273:
255:
237:
215:
60:Arun Kumar SINGH
54:non-admin closure
522:
505:
441:
402:
313:
214:
200:
199:
185:
137:
125:
107:
66:
61:
34:
530:
529:
525:
524:
523:
521:
520:
519:
518:
512:deletion review
501:
357:WP:NOTINHERITED
142:
133:
98:
82:
79:
64:
59:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
528:
526:
517:
516:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
468:
467:
429:
428:
390:
389:
340:
339:
303:
275:
274:
256:
238:
203:
202:
139:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
527:
515:
513:
509:
504:
498:
497:
486:
483:
480:
476:
472:
471:
470:
469:
466:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
440:
436:
433:
432:
431:
430:
427:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
401:
397:
394:
393:
392:
391:
388:
385:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
347:
344:
343:
342:
341:
338:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
312:
307:
304:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
283:
280:
277:
276:
272:
269:
266:
262:
257:
254:
251:
248:
244:
239:
236:
233:
230:
226:
221:
220:
219:
218:
213:
212:Seraphimblade
209:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
68:
67:
62:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
502:
499:
479:Everymorning
474:
439:TonyTheTiger
435:Everymorning
400:TonyTheTiger
396:Everymorning
381:Everymorning
349:TonyTheTiger
345:
311:TonyTheTiger
305:
278:
265:Everymorning
247:Everymorning
229:Everymorning
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
130:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
169:free images
456:WP:CHICAGO
417:WP:CHICAGO
328:WP:CHICAGO
309:notable.--
508:talk page
460:WP:WAWARD
421:WP:WAWARD
332:WP:WAWARD
37:talk page
510:or in a
128:View log
39:or in a
452:WP:FOUR
413:WP:FOUR
377:WP:CORP
369:WP:CORP
353:WT:CORP
346:Comment
324:WP:FOUR
279:Comment
175:WP refs
163:scholar
101:protect
96:history
65:(Talk)
482:(talk)
384:(talk)
373:WP:GNG
365:WP:GNG
293:Michig
268:(talk)
250:(talk)
232:(talk)
147:Google
105:delete
361:Masem
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
475:keep
375:and
367:and
306:Keep
297:talk
289:WP:V
183:FENS
157:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
50:keep
359:by
197:TWL
126:– (
52:. (
477:.
458:/
454:/
450:/
446:/
419:/
415:/
411:/
407:/
379:.
330:/
326:/
322:/
318:/
299:)
284:,
263:.
245:.
227:.
210:.
177:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
56:)
462:)
448:C
444:T
442:(
423:)
409:C
405:T
403:(
334:)
320:C
316:T
314:(
295:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
131:·
124:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.