Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Casey Kaplan - Knowledge

Source 📝

425:. The basic criteria says that organisation is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources, which we do have in this case. Now, my opinion is that the gallery or museum itself is just a mere box made of walls, unless the building it resided in is of some historical or architectural importance. Museums and galleries are know for representing the arts, so if we have significant coverage of exhibitions or events in specific gallery or museum it makes it the subject of an article. 444:. Galleries are normally commercial galleries, whose intention is the exhibition and sale of artworks. They are operated usually by individuals, who use their personal artistic and business judgement in selecting what to exhibit. Depending on the degree of selectivity of their selections, exhibiting in a famous gallery might contribute to notability, but in general does not for most. Anyway, this article is not about the gallery mentioned , but in using the artist's exhibition there to show notability . 539:
per nom. The sources found for this article are profile pages from non-independent/journalistic sources (artnet, for instance, is a commercial organization for promoting and *selling* art, not a reputable news organization with a history of fact-checking and editorial control - per
52:
to delete. There is no consensus below as to whether the sources are sufficient to establish notability for this subject or if they should be considered routine coverage. While the discussion could be relisted again for a fuller consideration of the additional sources proffered by
543:), lists of galleries in which Casey Kaplan is included only amongst a number of other galleries (WSJ and NYT articles), lists of showings, and notices that showings are happening there for a particular artist. We need secondary sources that discuss the subject comprehensively. 439:
I have difficulty understanding this comment, at least for museums, which have a major social role, a curated collection, a corporate identity. Being in the permanent collection of a major museum is explicitly one of the established guidelines at
171: 124: 287: 165: 57:, given two prior relists and the similarity of those sources to those already discussed I do not feel that another relisting is likely to lead to a clear consensus. 265: 243: 221: 131: 97: 92: 101: 17: 353: 401:
I continue to disagree that the mere fact the art shows take place at a particular art gallery make either of them notable.
362:
in my opinion. NYT, WSJ and artnews can stand for reliable sources and the Casey Kaplan has enough coverage there, I think.
186: 84: 153: 582: 514: 467: 430: 367: 312:
as searches found some links but nothing outstandingly convincing of a better article. Still questionable overall,
577: 622: 40: 318: 296: 274: 252: 230: 587: 572: 147: 496:. I'm a non-expert in this area, but I would say this subject just passes the general notability guideline. 143: 618: 601: 552: 529: 525: 505: 486: 455: 434: 426: 412: 396: 380: 371: 363: 342: 323: 301: 279: 257: 235: 213: 66: 36: 421:
Hmm, I didn't find any specific guidelines for galleries or museums, so I would try to argue basing on
387:. I can also see sufficient coverage out there, and the article is well enough written and not spammy. 62: 193: 597: 501: 338: 313: 291: 269: 247: 225: 179: 548: 484: 441: 392: 88: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
617:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
159: 58: 593: 497: 334: 54: 544: 477: 451: 422: 408: 384: 359: 209: 388: 80: 72: 567: 118: 541: 583:
http://www.flashartonline.com/2015/02/casey-kaplan-on-his-new-location-new-york/
578:
http://therealdeal.com/2014/07/01/fine-art-gallery-to-shake-up-flower-district/
202:
No substantial coverage--just one of a number of examples in general articles.
573:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-flower-district-the-next-chelsea-1424223982
356: 588:
http://observer.com/2014/06/casey-kaplan-is-headed-to-the-flower-district/
446: 403: 204: 333:- nothing remarkable about the said company to warrant notability. 611:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
517:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
470:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
114: 110: 106: 178: 476:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
523:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 625:). No further edits should be made to this page. 568:http://www.timeout.com/newyork/art/casey-kaplan 288:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 266:list of New York-related deletion discussions 244:list of Business-related deletion discussions 192: 8: 286:Note: This debate has been included in the 264:Note: This debate has been included in the 242:Note: This debate has been included in the 220:Note: This debate has been included in the 285: 263: 241: 219: 222:list of Arts-related deletion discussions 352:references in article as well as those: 7: 24: 560:These articles show notability: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 642: 602:16:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC) 553:22:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 530:02:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC) 456:22:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 372:07:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 343:07:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 324:06:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 302:06:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 280:06:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 258:06:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 236:06:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 214:05:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 67:05:53, 25 April 2016 (UTC) 506:21:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC) 487:20:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC) 435:08:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC) 413:21:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC) 397:14:45, 1 April 2016 (UTC) 614:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 48:The result was 532: 489: 304: 282: 260: 238: 633: 616: 528: 522: 520: 518: 482: 475: 473: 471: 427:Arthistorian1977 381:Arthistorian1977 364:Arthistorian1977 321: 316: 299: 294: 277: 272: 255: 250: 233: 228: 197: 196: 182: 134: 122: 104: 34: 641: 640: 636: 635: 634: 632: 631: 630: 629: 623:deletion review 612: 533: 524: 513: 511: 490: 478: 466: 464: 383:that it passes 358:grants passing 319: 314: 297: 292: 275: 270: 253: 248: 231: 226: 139: 130: 95: 79: 76: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 639: 637: 628: 627: 607: 606: 605: 604: 590: 585: 580: 575: 570: 562: 561: 555: 521: 510: 509: 508: 474: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 437: 416: 415: 399: 374: 346: 345: 327: 326: 315:SwisterTwister 306: 305: 293:SwisterTwister 283: 271:SwisterTwister 261: 249:SwisterTwister 239: 227:SwisterTwister 200: 199: 136: 75: 70: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 638: 626: 624: 620: 615: 609: 608: 603: 599: 595: 591: 589: 586: 584: 581: 579: 576: 574: 571: 569: 566: 565: 564: 563: 559: 556: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 535: 534: 531: 527: 526:North America 519: 516: 507: 503: 499: 495: 492: 491: 488: 485: 483: 481: 472: 469: 457: 453: 449: 448: 443: 438: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 419: 418: 417: 414: 410: 406: 405: 400: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 375: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 354: 351: 348: 347: 344: 340: 336: 332: 329: 328: 325: 322: 317: 311: 308: 307: 303: 300: 295: 289: 284: 281: 278: 273: 267: 262: 259: 256: 251: 245: 240: 237: 234: 229: 223: 218: 217: 216: 215: 211: 207: 206: 195: 191: 188: 185: 181: 177: 173: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 145: 142: 141:Find sources: 137: 133: 129: 126: 120: 116: 112: 108: 103: 99: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 77: 74: 71: 69: 68: 64: 60: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 613: 610: 557: 536: 512: 493: 479: 465: 445: 402: 376: 349: 330: 309: 203: 201: 189: 183: 175: 168: 162: 156: 150: 140: 127: 81:Casey Kaplan 73:Casey Kaplan 50:No Consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 442:WP:CREATIVE 379:Agree with 166:free images 59:Eluchil404 619:talk page 594:Rwxrwxrwx 498:QueenCake 335:Mwenzangu 55:Rwxrwxrwx 37:talk page 621:or in a 545:Chrisw80 515:Relisted 480:UY Scuti 468:Relisted 125:View log 39:or in a 389:Edwardx 172:WP refs 160:scholar 98:protect 93:history 537:Delete 423:WP:ORG 385:WP:GNG 360:WP:GNG 331:Delete 310:Delete 144:Google 102:delete 452:talk 409:talk 210:talk 187:JSTOR 148:books 132:Stats 119:views 111:watch 107:links 16:< 598:talk 558:Keep 549:talk 502:talk 494:Keep 431:talk 393:talk 377:Keep 368:talk 350:Keep 339:talk 320:talk 298:talk 276:talk 254:talk 232:talk 180:FENS 154:news 115:logs 89:talk 85:edit 63:talk 447:DGG 404:DGG 205:DGG 194:TWL 123:– ( 600:) 592:— 551:) 504:) 454:) 433:) 411:) 395:) 370:) 355:, 341:) 290:. 268:. 246:. 224:. 212:) 174:) 117:| 113:| 109:| 105:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 65:) 596:( 547:( 500:( 458:. 450:( 429:( 407:( 391:( 366:( 337:( 208:( 198:) 190:· 184:· 176:· 169:· 163:· 157:· 151:· 146:( 138:( 135:) 128:· 121:) 83:( 61:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Rwxrwxrwx
Eluchil404
talk
05:53, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Casey Kaplan
Casey Kaplan
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
DGG

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.