360:
sock. Furthermore, later in the discussion, the same blocking editor does state, "There is a good chance that all of this was done as a bit of a smokescreen. I believe that it is quite likely that pet articles of socks had been prodded..." And the discussion clearly came to the conclusion that in this instance, removing this prod (along with others), was vandalism/non-constructive editing. Regardless, no big deal, was just trying to give you some info. Take it easy.
277:
The guy appears to be notable in Poland as a graphic artist - there are several legit-appearing refs via Google, but I do not read Polish. And removing a PROD is not "vandalism" here as far as I can tell. I think we should find someone who can look up the person in Polish sources before we obliviate
359:
Hi. My purpose was merely to give you information regarding this editor, and was in response to your comment that removing a prod is not vandalism. The blocking admin does use the terminology "This is disruptive editing and some editor is avoiding scrutiny", which is pretty much the description of a
505:
is crippled by snippet-only view, But on p.24 I got lucky with what is at least a paragraph in
English about his work: "Cezary Paszkowski was eminent in the generation of the seventies. His creative work is faithful to th workshop priniples of his masters - Zukowski and Karofak. He began his create
506:
wandering from the realization of etchings..." Not sure how long this entry is; if it was half a page or longer, it would probably be good enough for to be considered a pretty good source. As it is, it's borderline, but I am leaning towards keeping. Ping
495:
as a publication (seems short lived and offline), published by the Gdańskie
Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Sztuki (Gdansk Society of Friends of Arts), a local NGO. I wasn't able to trace two others, however. I did, however, find one decent book reference.
161:
341:, and not about who any editor is, or whether removal of a PROD is ipso facto "vandalism." The IP is not called a sock by the blocking admin, by the way, so might you tell us the concrete evidence that the IP
468:. Setting aside Polish Knowledge different notability criteria (all professors are seen as notable there), what sources do I find? Local Polish portal has a brief info about his and his wives exhibition at the
405:
238:
251:
Never happen. IF you had meant good faith with the PROD deletion, you would have registered a valid keep vote here. I think you need a comb; you might want to see about that hair.
114:
155:
445:
485:, but sadly, without proper bibliographical references. Still, they have titles and authors, and are thus treacable, for example I traced a longer review by art critic
314:
242:
216:; awards do not appear significant - encyclopedic notability is not demonstrated. One can have exhibitions and win awards without having encyclopedic notability.
425:
287:
480:
121:
87:
82:
91:
74:
473:
387:
per nom and vanity; article was created by a new user who has done nothing else. Also, agree that deprodding as noted is sketchy.
176:
17:
143:
585:
556:
469:
137:
644:
317:
regarding the vandalism of removing this prod tag. This particular sock is discussed in the second bullet point.
40:
625:
604:
576:
547:
530:
457:
437:
417:
413:
396:
371:
354:
328:
298:
263:
246:
228:
203:
56:
133:
574:
78:
183:
640:
289:
and the assertion that he holds the title f "professor" which means that is also grounds for notability
36:
237:
I am neither a sockpuppet nor a vandal. Please strike that statement from your explanation. Thank you,
392:
409:
169:
602:
490:
149:
567:
543:
538:
per
Piotrus and museums and exhibitions. Modern printmakers don't get much internet coverage.
524:
482:, but it probably doesn't count for in-depth. He also seems to collect reviews of his work at
453:
433:
350:
294:
283:
70:
62:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
639:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
620:
507:
483:
476:
253:
218:
515:
388:
193:
595:
361:
318:
213:
200:
539:
520:
511:
486:
449:
429:
346:
310:
290:
279:
196:
notability. The few reliable sources merely make passing mention of the subject. -
53:
108:
493:
615:
498:
212:
Serial deprodded without explanation by apparent sock/vandal - clearly fails
197:
479:
4b. His work was briefly mentioned in mainstream Polish newspaper
633:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
588:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
559:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
406:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
104:
100:
96:
168:
565:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
594:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
286:) 23:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC) see Polish Knowledge
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
647:). No further edits should be made to this page.
503:. Fundacja rewaloryzacji zabytkow Gdanska. 1995.
446:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions
182:
8:
444:Note: This debate has been included in the
424:Note: This debate has been included in the
404:Note: This debate has been included in the
518:- what do you think about those sources? --
426:list of Poland-related deletion discussions
337:And? An AfD discussion is supposed to be
443:
423:
403:
239:2602:30A:2EFE:F050:A51D:74AE:FC51:1E65
521:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
626:17:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
605:18:25, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
577:04:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
548:03:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
531:04:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
458:16:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
438:16:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
372:19:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
355:14:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
329:13:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
57:00:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
418:07:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
397:08:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
299:23:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
264:22:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
247:22:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
229:21:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
204:21:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
664:
339:about the article at hand
636:Please do not modify it.
492:, which is described at
32:Please do not modify it.
470:National Museum, Gdańsk
345:a "sock"? SPI results?
607:
579:
475:). This may meet
460:
440:
420:
71:Cezary Paszkowski
63:Cezary Paszkowski
655:
638:
600:
593:
591:
589:
570:
564:
562:
560:
527:
508:User:ScrapIronIV
504:
487:pl:Jacek Kotlica
368:
365:
325:
322:
260:
258:
225:
223:
187:
186:
172:
124:
112:
94:
34:
663:
662:
658:
657:
656:
654:
653:
652:
651:
645:deletion review
634:
624:
608:
596:
584:
582:
580:
568:
555:
553:
529:
525:
516:User:MiracleMat
500:Gdanska grafika
497:
366:
363:
323:
320:
315:this discussion
256:
254:
221:
219:
129:
120:
85:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
661:
659:
650:
649:
629:
628:
618:
592:
581:
563:
552:
551:
550:
533:
519:
462:
461:
441:
421:
410:David Eppstein
400:
399:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
332:
331:
302:
301:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
232:
231:
190:
189:
126:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
660:
648:
646:
642:
637:
631:
630:
627:
622:
617:
614:per Piotrus.
613:
610:
609:
606:
603:
601:
599:
590:
587:
578:
575:
572:
571:
561:
558:
549:
545:
541:
537:
534:
532:
528:
522:
517:
513:
509:
502:
501:
494:
491:
488:
484:
481:
478:
474:
471:
467:
464:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
442:
439:
435:
431:
427:
422:
419:
415:
411:
407:
402:
401:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
382:
373:
370:
369:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:
334:
333:
330:
327:
326:
316:
312:
309:
306:
305:
304:
303:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
281:
276:
273:
272:
265:
262:
261:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:
234:
233:
230:
227:
226:
215:
211:
210:Speedy Delete
208:
207:
206:
205:
202:
199:
195:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
123:
119:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
635:
632:
611:
597:
583:
569:Juliancolton
566:
554:
535:
512:User:Collect
499:
465:
384:
362:
342:
338:
319:
307:
274:
252:
217:
209:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
117:
49:
47:
31:
28:
156:free images
526:reply here
389:MiracleMat
641:talk page
536:Weak keep
477:WP:ARTIST
466:Weak keep
450:• Gene93k
430:• Gene93k
37:talk page
643:or in a
598:UY Scuti
586:Relisted
557:Relisted
194:WP:BASIC
115:View log
39:or in a
540:Johnbod
347:Collect
311:Collect
308:Comment
291:Collect
280:Collect
275:No rush
162:WP refs
150:scholar
88:protect
83:history
54:Spartaz
616:clpo13
385:Delete
313:- See
214:WP:GNG
192:Fails
134:Google
92:delete
278:him.
259:pIron
224:pIron
177:JSTOR
138:books
122:Stats
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
621:talk
612:Keep
544:talk
454:talk
434:talk
414:talk
393:talk
367:5969
364:Onel
351:talk
324:5969
321:Onel
295:talk
284:talk
243:talk
170:FENS
144:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
50:keep
489:to
408:. —
255:Scr
220:Scr
184:TWL
113:– (
52:.
573:|
546:)
514:,
510:,
456:)
448:.
436:)
428:.
416:)
395:)
353:)
343:is
297:)
245:)
198:Mr
164:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
623:)
619:(
542:(
523:|
472:(
452:(
432:(
412:(
391:(
349:(
293:(
282:(
257:★
241:(
222:★
201:X
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
118:·
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.