Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Celia en el colegio - Knowledge

Source πŸ“

140:, which was based on the whole series, not a single individual book. The books themselves have no individual notability, no major coverage in third-party reliable sources, and the article is completely unreferenced, despite extraordinary claims of being a great success, and consist primarily of plot summary and a blow-by-blow comparision to the three episodes. 454:
articles. Also, from above del sorts, Spanish project was notified. FYI, though these are claimed by the creator to be "classics" and important to Spanish literature, there are no articles for any of the Cecil books on the Spanish Knowledge. There is a single very brief article on the television series and a brief one on the author.
325:
You call them classics, say they are an important icon, etc, but neither this nor the other article actually shows this. They are almost entirely plot point and your own original research. Where are the sources? If they are classics, then there should be tons of reliable sources you can use to give
468:
Lack of online content means little in this case - many older notable folks lack articles - much of the online info on various notable people is meagre at best and there are requests all over for various redlinks. Doesn't worry me. I have this hope we can do better research and sourcing than just
428:
need to avoid recentism and systemic bias. Book is of notable author. Not a tie-in as it antedates the TV material. Criteria 3 and 5 look likely to be fulfilled to me. Book sourcing can be difficult online due to wading thru online booksellers. Should notify spanish wikiproject methinks. Cheers,
384:
He's been blocked for insulting me in beyond inappropriate ways and continued personal attacks on his talk page that sent him to AN/I, blocking, and user talk page protection. Also, I was not biting. I gave the user a lot of help on the TV article, a lot of which dealt with the same issues.
453:
Has nothing to do with either "recentism" nor "systemic bias." If author is notable, why does she have no article either? Online searches for information about her almost all book store listings. If she's notable, please actually show it rather than just say it. Give the sources and fix the
171:
deleted. Given the claims of popularity, though, it would surprise me if references supporting the notability of the individual books aren't available in Spanish. Withholding !vote till others have a chance to work on that.
326:
them proper articles. As it is now, from the articles themselves, and your own comments on the template deletion, you've basically been making articles with plots and your own thoughts on each book as you can acquire them.
306:
classics by Elena FortΓΊn, an important icon of Spanish culture, part of millions of childrens' lives are not eligible for the Knowledge? Alright, I guess there Harry Potter articles should go out next. Do whatever.
560:– A series of books published for over 70 years and converted into a TV series appears notable. This article is in need of more citations, especially ones establishing its notability and importance. β€” 190:
I note, btw, that even the English langauge sources in a Google Books search are highly suggestive, including one indicating the series' influence on the next generation of women writers in Spain. β€”
489:
Yes, but can you do the same here is the question. Its not enough to just say "I'm sure sources exist" but they must actually be provided to point out the notability of this specific book.
515: 279: 125: 253: 92: 87: 96: 79: 159:
C3 would apply even if only part of the television series is adapted from the book, as the wording's abiguous. In any case, the series
17: 480: 440: 226:
I wouldn't object to a merge, though at this point I strongly suspect each book can ultimate sustain an article on its own. β€”
469:
googling for a few minutes. I have found books essential for all my FAs and an increasing number of my GAs too. Cheers,
589: 569: 552: 531: 498: 484: 463: 444: 408: 394: 379: 357: 335: 316: 294: 268: 235: 217: 199: 181: 149: 61: 604: 36: 603:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
353: 312: 83: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
494: 459: 390: 331: 213: 145: 539:- what offered, and a small personal enquiry in google books, convince me that this book clearly passes 527: 404: 375: 290: 264: 231: 195: 177: 518:
and others found through Google Books demonstrate the historic notability of the author, thus passing
53: 349: 308: 75: 67: 57: 474: 434: 490: 455: 386: 327: 209: 167:
C3, so at worst the article should be merged into an article about the series as a whole, and
141: 137: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
585: 565: 523: 400: 371: 286: 260: 227: 191: 173: 548: 367: 470: 430: 577: 540: 519: 164: 156: 133: 49: 113: 581: 561: 366:
here and help get these articles into wikiworthy shape. And AnmaFinotera, stop
544: 48:(non-admin closure). The consensus of the discussion is that the novel meets 208:
If that's the case, then perhaps a merge to a single article on the series?
370:. They may be a bit heavy on the plot, but so are most book stubs. β€” 597:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
580:, having been made into a TV show widely televised in Spain. β€” 136:. Minor tie to the television series is already covered in 120: 109: 105: 101: 348:
Fine, delete everything. Who gives a damn, not me.
516:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Celia en el mundo 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 607:). No further edits should be made to this page. 280:list of Literature-related deletion discussions 8: 254:list of Spain-related deletion discussions 278:: This debate has been included in the 252:: This debate has been included in the 362:Ahem. I give a damn, so there. Now get 7: 576:Also appears to meet criterion 3 of 24: 155:An argument could be made that 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 514:given the sources provided at 1: 624: 600:Please do not modify it. 590:20:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 570:20:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 553:23:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC) 532:15:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC) 499:05:42, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 485:05:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 464:04:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 445:04:18, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 409:16:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 395:04:01, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 380:03:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 358:01:37, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 336:01:34, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 317:01:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 295:23:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 269:23:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 236:15:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC) 218:16:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 200:16:18, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 182:23:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 150:23:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 62:00:45, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 522:C5, and C1 as well. β€” 76:Celia en el colegio 68:Celia en el colegio 297: 283: 271: 257: 138:Celia (TV series) 615: 602: 284: 274: 258: 248: 123: 117: 99: 44:The result was 34: 623: 622: 618: 617: 616: 614: 613: 612: 611: 605:deletion review 598: 119: 90: 74: 71: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 621: 619: 610: 609: 593: 592: 573: 572: 555: 534: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 448: 447: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 341: 340: 339: 338: 320: 319: 299: 298: 272: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 221: 220: 203: 202: 185: 184: 130: 129: 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 620: 608: 606: 601: 595: 594: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 574: 571: 567: 563: 559: 556: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 535: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 510: 509: 500: 496: 492: 488: 487: 486: 482: 479: 476: 472: 467: 466: 465: 461: 457: 452: 451: 450: 449: 446: 442: 439: 436: 432: 427: 424: 423: 410: 406: 402: 398: 397: 396: 392: 388: 383: 382: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 360: 359: 355: 351: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 337: 333: 329: 324: 323: 322: 321: 318: 314: 310: 305: 301: 300: 296: 292: 288: 281: 277: 273: 270: 266: 262: 255: 251: 247: 246: 237: 233: 229: 225: 224: 223: 222: 219: 215: 211: 207: 206: 205: 204: 201: 197: 193: 189: 188: 187: 186: 183: 179: 175: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 153: 152: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 127: 122: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 599: 596: 557: 536: 511: 491:AnmaFinotera 477: 456:AnmaFinotera 437: 425: 387:AnmaFinotera 363: 328:AnmaFinotera 303: 275: 249: 210:AnmaFinotera 168: 160: 142:AnmaFinotera 131: 45: 43: 31: 28: 524:Quasirandom 401:Quasirandom 372:Quasirandom 287:Quasirandom 261:Quasirandom 228:Quasirandom 192:Quasirandom 174:Quasirandom 52:C3 and C5. 54:Darkspots 481:contribs 471:Casliber 441:contribs 431:Casliber 126:View log 163:passes 161:clearly 93:protect 88:history 368:biting 132:Fails 121:delete 97:delete 578:WP:BK 545:Aldux 543:C5.-- 541:WP:BK 520:WP:BK 399:Ah. β€” 304:Celia 165:WP:BK 157:WP:BK 134:WP:BK 124:) – ( 114:views 106:watch 102:links 50:WP:BK 16:< 586:talk 566:talk 558:Keep 549:talk 537:Keep 528:talk 512:Keep 495:talk 475:talk 460:talk 435:talk 426:Keep 405:talk 391:talk 376:talk 364:back 354:talk 350:T.W. 332:talk 313:talk 309:T.W. 302:The 291:talk 276:Note 265:talk 250:Note 232:talk 214:talk 196:talk 178:talk 146:talk 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 46:Keep 282:. 256:. 169:not 588:) 568:) 551:) 530:) 497:) 483:) 462:) 443:) 407:) 393:) 378:) 356:) 334:) 315:) 293:) 267:) 234:) 216:) 198:) 180:) 148:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 584:( 582:Ξ» 564:( 562:Ξ» 547:( 526:( 493:( 478:Β· 473:( 458:( 438:Β· 433:( 403:( 389:( 374:( 352:( 330:( 311:( 289:( 285:β€” 263:( 259:β€” 230:( 212:( 194:( 176:( 172:β€” 144:( 128:) 118:( 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
WP:BK
Darkspots
talk
00:45, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Celia en el colegio
Celia en el colegio
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
WP:BK
Celia (TV series)
AnmaFinotera
talk
23:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
WP:BK
WP:BK
Quasirandom
talk
23:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Quasirandom

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑