Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Ceri James - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

405:
that's why he wrote to me. The problem is that it causes too much confusion. He used to be in a band called The Mountaineers(not sure if he still is I think he left) he is not a solo singersongwriter under the name Ceri James. His own solo project is called something else so he should write that name onto wikipedia. Also he wasn't in the Ordinary Boys original line up I think he was drafted in a as a session musician - and the Ordinary Boys don't even exist now. If he's mainly a session musician he should state that otherwise it could mislead people. My own solo album under the name Ceri James is in all major record stores and downloads. It's registered for the chart and I'm a member of the PRS. This article uses Ceri James myspace but I actually have the CeriJames url on myspace he has another url for his solo project under a completely different name. I think for the benefit of both parties the article either needs to be ammended or deleted.
639:
mentioned in the Echo and the Bunnymen article so there doesn't need to be a seperate article. Although he definitely was a founding and significant member of the Mountaineers it's unlikely that they reach notability either cause they only released one album. Even if they did then this article should redirect and not mention contain personal references to his own project which doesn't obtain notability. If wikipedia believes his session work does obtain notability then again personal references to his own project shouldn't really be mentioned as again this could create a conflict of interest and isn't relevant at the moment. Perhaps the fairest way would be to ammend the article - I know alot of people are unhappy with the whole deletion process on wikipedia.
619:, which combined with the other claims presently in the article leads me to believe that person is notable. As far as I can tell, this is NOT the Ceri James who released an album called "Start and Begin", for whom I have not found evidence of notability. Presumably, this is the Ceri James who nominated the article for deletion. Another Ceri James, possibly one of these two and possibly a third, does theatrical lighting design. Who'd have thought there would be so many Ceri James's? 458:(unless all members of notable bands are notable - in which case I'm wrong). Problem is from looking around I don't think the "other Ceri James" (the nom) meets the criteria any better under that name based on searches I've been able to do. I say delete and protect (as it is easy enough to request unprotection if either of the two (or both) prove to be notable in future. 497:
wikipedia keeps supplying inaccurate, incomplete or poorly researched information no one will take it seriously. Any person who looks up this article couldquite easily end up assuming we are the same person. As I said I don't know all the procedures and guidlines but it needs amending or deletion end of.
388:
Actually, it isn't relevant who wrote the article. This is about policies, guidelines, and quality of the specific article in question. "Self-written" articles are not Verboten, just not encouraged. Perfectly reasonable, encyclopedic, and neutral articles can be written even by the subject (it's just
122:
In this article Ceri James describes himself firstly as a singersongwriter - there is another singersongwriter called Ceri James it therefore causes confusion. Also the Ceri James listed here although he is a writer he works under different names like Kezzatron and with a band called The mountaineers
496:
It's not a question of he isn't as important as me - people have a right to know accuate information - this article doesn't really provide that. I tried to edit this article to explain who I am and that we are two different people not one and the same but that got deleted by someone on wikipedia. If
404:
Well I don't think people should write their own history as a general rule(isn't that what the Nazi's did). But whatever, I already spoke to Ceri James a few years back who quite possibly wrote this article himself - I don't know. I think he was a bit worried there would be confusion about the name
361:
What??? It's not relevant that the article might have been done by the person themselves or by their best friend. Of course it's relevant it's the most relevant question you can ask. Also If the ordinary boys is made up of session musicians then it wouldn't be a band - it would be Preston's backing
638:
true enough he was a session musician(possibly still is)for Echo & The Bunnymen and Ordinary Boys but I'm not sure that being a session man for either of these bands constitutes being a significant band member. He wasn't a founder member or significant member in either band and he is already
557:
I think Jasynnash2 might be right his proposal might be the fairest way forward. If the article had been about Ceri James the keyboardist and session musician I'd have had no problem with it. It's the singersongwriter part which is causing confusion. I think it must be wikipedia policy that all
246:. They are probably bigger in the UK than elsewhere. I'm not sure about Ceri James though. If he is a session musician for The Ordinary Boys, rather than a band member, I'm not sure the notability of the band is that relevant. I've found this source for him being a session musician 123:
and he doesn't use the name Ceri James. He works mostly as a session musician not as a singersongwriter under this name therefore the article is misleading. The other singersongwriter Ceri James not listed here has released an album under the name Ceri James.
480:
sticks to discussing the article itself and the policies and guidelines which mean it needs to be deleted as at the moment it looks like a he isn't as important as me arguement which doesn't help the article or wikipedia in anyway. Thanks.
316:
I think alot of the aticles about bands and musicians on wikipedia are done by the band members or musicians themselves. They shouldn't do this it should happen organically. There seem to be quite a few articles that should be deleted.
530:
which means it should be deleted. I'm not proposing to replace this article with a new one about myself immediately - time will tell if either party reaches notability status although there is a strong case that I'm already qualified.
453:
despite the drama surrounding this I've decided to way in. I don't believe the Mountaineers meet notability criteria (based on the content of their article), which would mean that the subject of this article doesn't meet
181: 615:
Well, this one is a doozy, since it's hard to tell what references are referring to which Ceri James. However, it appears that the current subject Ceri James is a touring member of
115: 210:
Hmm, user CeriJames nominated article "Ceri James" for deletion, presumably to replace the article with one about CeriJames. I think the current Ceri James fails
276:). As for the bizarre assertion that "This article also shouldn't be about an individual it's against Knowledge (XXG) policy", tell that to 244: 655: 277: 17: 565: 412: 526:
I also noticed Jasynnash2 contradicts himself he says the Mountaineers don't meet notability therefore the article doesn't meet
546: 512: 377: 332: 234:
are notable. They (according to our article) have a number of uk chart hits (both albums and singles). Also see these sources:
143: 88: 83: 92: 344: 672: 36: 75: 476:
and if I'm out of order feel free to tell me constructive and civil way on my talk page. I'd like to request that
671:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
651: 155: 53: 643: 569: 561: 534: 500: 416: 408: 365: 320: 297: 131: 616: 194: 647: 628: 605: 573: 550: 516: 490: 467: 444: 420: 398: 381: 355: 336: 310: 288: 258: 223: 199: 167: 57: 486: 463: 440: 394: 254: 538: 504: 477: 428: 369: 324: 135: 542: 508: 373: 328: 219: 139: 527: 455: 211: 593: 273: 247: 231: 163: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
269: 624: 352: 285: 188: 432: 482: 459: 436: 390: 250: 238: 79: 241: 304: 215: 127:
This article also shouldn't be about an individual it's against Knowledge (XXG) policy
598: 589: 159: 235: 109: 620: 348: 281: 49: 71: 63: 583:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
268:
Member of two bands, at least one of which, possibly both, appears to pass
665:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
182:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
105: 101: 97: 296:
Hmm indeed. The creator of the article is a certain
588:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 675:). No further edits should be made to this page. 214:unless "The Ordinary Boys" is a notable band. 8: 427:Please note the above is most likely from 435:says he probably simply forgot to login. 558:articles contain accurate information. 343:That's not relevant to this discussion; 180:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 249:. I assume that's the same person. 24: 1: 692: 596:) 01:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC) 629:22:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 606:22:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 574:22:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 551:19:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 517:18:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 491:15:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 468:15:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 445:15:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 421:15:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 399:08:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 389:that many don't bother). 382:21:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 356:20:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 337:20:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 311:21:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 289:19:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 259:20:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 224:16:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 200:15:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 168:12:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 668:Please do not modify it. 154:This AfD nomination was 58:09:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 146:) 2008/06/13 00:10:25 617:Echo and the Bunnymen 298:User:Alex mountaineer 278:WikiProject Biography 158:. It is listed now. 636:weak delete/ammend' 345:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 44:The result was 660: 646:comment added by 597: 576: 564:comment added by 553: 537:comment added by 519: 503:comment added by 423: 411:comment added by 384: 368:comment added by 339: 323:comment added by 274:The Ordinary Boys 232:The Ordinary Boys 202: 185: 148: 134:comment added by 683: 670: 659: 640: 603: 587: 585: 559: 532: 498: 406: 363: 318: 197: 191: 186: 176: 147: 128: 113: 95: 34: 691: 690: 686: 685: 684: 682: 681: 680: 679: 673:deletion review 666: 641: 599: 581: 307: 195: 189: 129: 86: 70: 67: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 689: 687: 678: 677: 633: 632: 609: 608: 586: 578: 555: 554: 494: 493: 478:User:Cerijames 448: 447: 429:User:Cerijames 402: 401: 359: 358: 314: 313: 303: 291: 263: 262: 261: 204: 203: 173: 172: 171: 170: 126: 120: 119: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 688: 676: 674: 669: 663: 662: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 637: 630: 626: 622: 618: 614: 611: 610: 607: 604: 602: 595: 591: 584: 580: 579: 577: 575: 571: 567: 563: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 529: 525: 522: 521: 520: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 492: 488: 484: 479: 475: 472: 471: 470: 469: 465: 461: 457: 452: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 425: 424: 422: 418: 414: 410: 400: 396: 392: 387: 386: 385: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 357: 354: 350: 346: 342: 341: 340: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 312: 309: 306: 299: 295: 292: 290: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 245: 242: 239: 236: 233: 230: 227: 226: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 206: 205: 201: 198: 192: 183: 179: 175: 174: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 152: 151: 150: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 124: 117: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 667: 664: 648:82.27.194.58 642:— Preceding 635: 634: 612: 600: 582: 556: 523: 495: 473: 450: 449: 403: 360: 315: 301: 293: 265: 228: 207: 177: 130:— Preceding 125: 121: 46:No consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 566:80.4.15.164 560:—Preceding 533:—Preceding 499:—Preceding 451:Weak Delete 413:80.4.15.164 407:—Preceding 364:—Preceding 319:—Preceding 190:Fabrictramp 524:additional 483:Jasynnash2 474:Additional 460:Jasynnash2 437:Jasynnash2 391:Jasynnash2 251:Silverfish 196:talk to me 156:incomplete 72:Ceri_James 64:Ceri James 539:Cerijames 505:Cerijames 370:Cerijames 325:Cerijames 216:Tempshill 136:Cerijames 656:contribs 644:unsigned 562:unsigned 547:contribs 535:unsigned 528:WP:MUSIC 513:contribs 501:unsigned 456:WP:MUSIC 409:unsigned 378:contribs 366:unsigned 333:contribs 321:unsigned 229:Comment: 212:WP:MUSIC 208:Comment: 144:contribs 132:unsigned 116:View log 601:JForget 590:Locobot 362:band. 294:Comment 270:WP:BAND 160:DumbBOT 89:protect 84:history 621:gnfnrf 433:WP:AGF 349:Gwalla 302:sparkl 282:Gwalla 93:delete 50:Stifle 266:Keep. 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 652:talk 625:talk 613:Keep 594:talk 570:talk 543:talk 509:talk 487:talk 464:talk 441:talk 417:talk 395:talk 374:talk 353:Talk 347:. — 329:talk 286:Talk 280:! — 255:talk 220:talk 178:Note 164:talk 140:talk 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 187:-- 184:. 114:- ( 658:) 654:• 627:) 572:) 549:) 545:• 515:) 511:• 489:) 466:) 443:) 431:- 419:) 397:) 380:) 376:• 351:| 335:) 331:• 308:sm 300:. 284:| 257:) 243:, 240:, 237:, 222:) 193:| 166:) 142:• 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 48:. 650:( 631:) 623:( 592:( 568:( 541:( 507:( 485:( 462:( 439:( 415:( 393:( 372:( 327:( 305:! 272:( 253:( 218:( 162:( 138:( 118:) 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Stifle
talk
09:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Ceri James
Ceri_James
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
unsigned
Cerijames
talk
contribs
incomplete
DumbBOT
talk
12:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
Fabrictramp
talk to me
15:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
WP:MUSIC

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑