312:
that this it is one of the four certifications created and maintained by ISACA which is a recognised organisation focused on promoting best practice in IT audit, security, risk management, and governance. I've noticed that twice the same user ("Hell in a Bucket") has nominated the article for deletion, first because of lack of notability, now because the only source is ISACA's website. As I said in the article's talk page, there are good reasons for having this article in
Knowledge. To sum up:
483:
notability? As I mentioned above (6th July), the fact that "... already 5000 professionals are certified..." in just 1 year, shows that this certification is important enough (at least for part of the GRC community, represented by ISACA membership) to be considered notable enought to keep the current
439:
option sounds reasonable, however given the current extension of the article I think is more tidy to keep it. As per ISACA, the title starts with "Certified...", please check original source. Bear in mind the certification has just 1 year since announced, and 1st exam was taken in June 2011. Regards,
390:
Hi again! I was able to find online some 3rd party sources, mainly in the form of news about the progress of the
Grandfathering program, and added the links to the article (which still needs some work on it). Given that already 5000 professionals are certified (more than those certified as CGEIT!), I
420:
article. The tone is certainly acceptable, but all I am finding in news/scholar/books is announcements that the certification is available, or that individuals or businesses have been awarded it: all press releases in other words. There isn't so much information in these subpages that merger would
366:
requires that the product be covered by third party sources which help validate if it's a notable product or ust something being sold. As is it appears right now that it's a non notable product that's being peddled on
Knowledge. If you think you need to beef it up consider making a subuserpage like
311:
Dear
Wikipedians: I'm trying to understand why it seems to be a focus on deleting the article related to CRISC certification from ISACA. It is not my intention to advertise it, as it needs no such advertisement in this encyclopedia (ISACA thakes care of that aspect by itself). Please keep in mind
371:
once it meets the notability guidelines then move it to mainspace. Something I've learned in the 70 or so articles I've made if the notability is in question before you publish make sure you have at least three 3rd party sources when you publish and it may help avoid csd and deletions.
84:
361:
Hi there I can see you're confused as to how article should be if it's in mainspace, The article as it stands and the certification as it stands lack ntbility. You use the CISA article as a reason it should be kept but look at that article compared to yours.
177:
79:
318:
2- In few months after it was announced, almost 10% of ISACA's membership (9000 professionals) have applied for the
Grandfathering for this certification, that should give an indication of the importance given by the GRC community to this
391:
think that notability should be no longer questioned. And same is true for article deletion. Rhather than that, I kindly ask you to help improving the article and finding additional 3rd party verifiable sources. Thanks & regards,
343:
I kindly request that the CRISC article is removed from the "deletion" list and reasonable time is given to the wikipedia community to improve its quality. After all, that's one of the key strengths of this encyclopedia.
111:
106:
115:
98:
325:
4- The supposed lack of coverage in references is due to this article having been created as a "start" so it has the basics covered and is a baseline to allow other editors to review it and contribute adding
171:
102:
208:
Delete, Articles only source is the company offering. I csd as this is a multiple recreation/advertisement article but since it was "encyclopeadic in tone" I'm taking it here.
493:
472:
449:
429:
400:
381:
355:
300:
263:
240:
217:
63:
315:
1- There are already articles on the other 3 certifications (CISA, CISM, CGEIT) offered by ISACA, and they have been considered notable enough to keep (so why not CRISC?);
94:
69:
47:
248:
336:, so that needs to be taken into consideration before asking for deletion of this article. I'm not an expert editor, but always act transparently and in good faith.
225:
138:
192:
159:
368:
153:
149:
199:
329:
5- I made clear my intention to search for additional verifiable sources to expand the article, as soon as I have more time to do so.
294:
165:
17:
421:
mar the article in chief. Should the title really begin with "Certified...." rather than "Certification" or "Certificate"? -
463:
notable yet. If it ever becomes notable enough to have its own article, then the idependent sources would support it.
377:
213:
322:
3- The first exam has already been taken in June 2011, so this certification is a reality and not just a proposal;
506:
36:
505:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
373:
288:
209:
468:
185:
484:
individual article. Which in turn will give more room for expanding it. Thanks & regards,
259:
236:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
426:
284:
85:
Articles for deletion/Certified in Risk and
Information Systems Control (2nd nomination)
489:
464:
445:
396:
351:
54:
363:
333:
279:
275:
255:
232:
132:
422:
485:
441:
392:
347:
282:… the only cited references are the subject's own website. Happy Editing! —
80:
Articles for deletion/Certified in Risk and
Information Systems Control
417:
499:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
369:
User talk:DPdH/Certified in Risk and
Information Systems Control
128:
124:
120:
184:
95:Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control
70:Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control
48:Information Systems Audit and Control Association
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
509:). No further edits should be made to this page.
249:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
226:list of Business-related deletion discussions
198:
8:
479:Can you please point where I gave a case of
247:Note: This debate has been included in the
224:Note: This debate has been included in the
459:since you give a good case as to why it is
246:
223:
332:6- I created this article in good faith
77:
416:all of these certifications into the
7:
427:killing the human spirit since 2003!
76:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
526:
502:Please do not modify it.
494:04:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
473:23:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
450:08:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
430:19:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
401:08:42, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
382:17:30, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
356:17:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
301:00:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
264:17:40, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
241:17:39, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
218:21:50, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
64:06:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
346:Thanks & regards,
75:AfDs for this article:
412:, weakly, or perhaps
44:The result was
278:coverage to meet
266:
252:
243:
229:
62:
517:
504:
374:Hell In A Bucket
253:
230:
210:Hell In A Bucket
203:
202:
188:
136:
118:
61:
59:
52:
34:
525:
524:
520:
519:
518:
516:
515:
514:
513:
507:deletion review
500:
423:Smerdis of Tlön
303:
145:
109:
93:
90:
73:
55:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
523:
521:
512:
511:
496:
476:
475:
453:
452:
433:
432:
406:
405:
404:
403:
385:
384:
345:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
330:
327:
323:
320:
319:certification;
316:
305:
304:
299:
268:
267:
244:
206:
205:
142:
89:
88:
87:
82:
74:
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
522:
510:
508:
503:
497:
495:
491:
487:
482:
478:
477:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
455:
454:
451:
447:
443:
438:
435:
434:
431:
428:
424:
419:
415:
411:
408:
407:
402:
398:
394:
389:
388:
387:
386:
383:
379:
375:
370:
365:
360:
359:
358:
357:
353:
349:
335:
331:
328:
324:
321:
317:
314:
313:
310:
307:
306:
302:
298:
296:
293:
290:
286:
281:
277:
273:
270:
269:
265:
261:
257:
250:
245:
242:
238:
234:
227:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
140:
134:
130:
126:
122:
117:
113:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
91:
86:
83:
81:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
60:
58:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
501:
498:
480:
460:
456:
436:
413:
409:
342:
308:
291:
283:
271:
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
56:
45:
43:
31:
28:
285:70.21.17.51
172:free images
57:Sandstein
465:W Nowicki
256:• Gene93k
233:• Gene93k
46:merge to
326:content;
295:contribs
274:- Lacks
139:View log
178:WP refs
166:scholar
112:protect
107:history
410:Delete
364:WP:GNG
334:WP:AGF
280:WP:GNG
272:Delete
150:Google
116:delete
457:Merge
437:Merge
418:ISACA
414:merge
276:WP:RS
193:JSTOR
154:books
133:views
125:watch
121:links
16:<
490:talk
486:DPdH
469:talk
446:talk
442:DPdH
397:talk
393:DPdH
378:talk
352:talk
348:DPdH
309:Keep
289:talk
260:talk
237:talk
214:talk
186:FENS
160:news
129:logs
103:talk
99:edit
481:not
461:not
200:TWL
137:– (
492:)
471:)
448:)
425:-
399:)
380:)
354:)
262:)
254:—
251:.
239:)
231:—
228:.
216:)
180:)
131:|
127:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
51:.
488:(
467:(
444:(
395:(
376:(
350:(
297:)
292:·
287:(
258:(
235:(
212:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
135:)
97:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.