346:
minister? Is he the diet guru? And so on. Sources are silent about
Forsberg the man and not Forsberg-who-invented-ZMODEM-that-was-popular-till-dial-up-BBSes-died. Does writing a widely used piece of software make the creator notable? And collecting virtual clippings from the subject's own Web site covering a one-shot press conference seems sketchy even by Knowledge (XXG) standards. I don't think someone is notable if you can't even find out what year he was born without flying down to his (unknown?) home city. --
388:- I will first admit a computing age bias and declare that I hail from the era of BBSes, and from personal knowledge know of the YMODEM and ZMODEM protocols. A google book serch for Chuck Forsberg shows that he is heavily identified with the transmission protocols that he created, and the material about these protocols indicate that they were a significant bit of work with respect to BBS file transmissions. See
433:
So creation of one, (once) widespread piece of software is alone, enough to assert notability? I don't think I'm trying to be difficult here, I'm just trying to figure out why
Forsberg gets an article and the creator of the Clapp oscillator doesn't. Difference being, there's still Clapp oscillators
460:
which is currently a redirect to the Clapp oscillator article. The redirect's history shows that it was recently created. There's no indication that it went through any deletion. I have no idea if he deserves an article as I've done no research about him, but as I said, that he doesn't have an
360:
When we have issues of verifiability with the assertion of notability in the article, then we are in a situation where notability cannot be reliably established. In this case, there is no dispute that the subject of this article is the creator of YMODEM and ZMODEM (see soruces below). So the
501:
A protocol isn't the same thing as software. It's more like inventing a language. This was back when downloading 1 MB took 20 minutes. ZMODEM was much faster: a revolutionary improvement on its predecessor. This made
Forsberg so famous he was given an award. (Incidentally, I agree re YMODEM.)
345:
That helps, but it's a pity we haven't got any conventional biographical information. Is there anything that gives away, oh, say, what year he was born? Just one of the things that a real biography would be expected to have. Yes, we know he invented ZMODEM. But what else? Is he the
Baptist
392:
389:
395:
407:
404:
401:
398:
318:
185:
Unsourced biography of a (living?) person. No reliable independent sources with any depth (can't even get DOB), no independent coverage. No known awards. Contribution was fairly obscure and his fame has not endured past the dial-up BBS era.
154:
361:
assertion of notability is verifiable. So what remains is your query of not having a birth date available means that they are not likely notable. I will point out that we have in fact lots of people in
365:. So the only thing I can surmise is that you are really challenging the whether being the creator of YMODEM, and ZMODEM is a sufficient claim for ntoability. I address that in my !vote below. --
232:
115:
413:
point 2, the transmission protocols were signficant new techniques, or in the alternative, per point 3, this work has been heavily covered in reliable sources with reviews. -
206:
148:
362:
448:
In this case, for me, the answer is yes, although it isn't one, but two transmission protocols that he worked on. As for the inventor of the
289:
YMODEM and ZMODEM were quite important to early 1990s computing, and well known. Forsberg is widely cited for creating them. He won a
88:
83:
17:
92:
75:
270:(standard university text of the period) certainly covers the protocols and I'd expect it to at least mention their creator.
169:
136:
477:
He wouldn't warrant an article for YModem (a fairly simple evolution from XModem), but he does for ZModem alone. So does
530:
36:
130:
529:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
434:
in every darn thing, but there's a whole generation growing up that wouldn't know ZMODEM from Morse code. --
511:
494:
470:
453:
443:
422:
374:
355:
336:
279:
247:
221:
195:
126:
57:
490:
275:
439:
351:
191:
53:
410:
176:
313:
press event he staged to defend himself against claims made about ZMODEM's performance compared to
162:
79:
457:
486:
314:
271:
243:
217:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
302:
449:
435:
347:
187:
142:
49:
485:
for PGP. Sometimes one invention is enough, even if it's software rather than hardware.
482:
466:
418:
370:
71:
63:
507:
332:
290:
323:
Forsberg participated in pirate radio station as a cadet at WMAS. The book cites a
298:
239:
213:
452:, the existence or lack of existence of other articles has no earing on this AFD (
109:
266:) is hardly "obscure". Ask your Grandad. For references, I'd expect Tanenbaum's
327:(new URL). It's not a lot, but it seems like enough to keep a short article. --
478:
462:
414:
366:
503:
328:
409:
are just some of the many hits that one gets int he book search. Per
305:. Notability is easily established. According to Forsberg's website,
263:
259:
306:
523:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
294:
324:
293:
for
Excellence in Telecommunications in 1992 (listed at
105:
101:
97:
161:
233:
175:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
533:). No further edits should be made to this page.
461:article has no bearing on this discussion. --
363:Category:Date of birth missing (living people)
207:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
325:Forsberg's page from Forsberg's personal site
8:
227:
201:
231:: This debate has been included in the
205:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
512:00:24, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
495:18:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
471:18:46, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
444:17:59, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
423:17:45, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
375:17:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
58:01:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
356:16:41, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
337:01:50, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
301:). So he meets #1 and #2 at
280:01:16, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
248:23:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
222:23:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
196:21:50, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
456:). I am assuming you mean
550:
481:for the PK archivers and
526:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
262:and, more importantly,
458:James Kilton Clapp
258:His contribution (
44:The result was
320:Rebels on the Air
297:and confirmed in
268:Computer Networks
250:
236:
224:
210:
541:
528:
450:Clapp oscillator
295:the award's site
237:
211:
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
549:
548:
544:
543:
542:
540:
539:
538:
537:
531:deletion review
524:
317:. According to
311:publicity stunt
122:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
547:
545:
536:
535:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
498:
497:
483:Phil Zimmerman
474:
473:
426:
425:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
340:
339:
299:another source
283:
282:
252:
251:
225:
183:
182:
119:
72:Chuck Forsberg
66:
64:Chuck Forsberg
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
546:
534:
532:
527:
521:
513:
509:
505:
500:
499:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
475:
472:
468:
464:
459:
455:
454:WP:OTHERSTUFF
451:
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
405:
402:
399:
396:
393:
390:
387:
384:
383:
376:
372:
368:
364:
359:
358:
357:
353:
349:
344:
343:
342:
341:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
321:
316:
312:
308:
307:three sources
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
284:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
234:
230:
226:
223:
219:
215:
208:
204:
200:
199:
198:
197:
193:
189:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
525:
522:
487:Andy Dingley
385:
319:
310:
291:Dvorak Award
286:
272:Andy Dingley
267:
255:
228:
202:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
45:
43:
31:
28:
436:Wtshymanski
411:WP:CREATIVE
348:Wtshymanski
188:Wtshymanski
149:free images
50:Ron Ritzman
309:covered a
479:Phil Katz
240:• Gene93k
214:• Gene93k
116:View log
303:WP:AUTH
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
406:, and
315:Kermit
264:ZModem
260:YModem
127:Google
93:delete
287:Keep.
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
508:talk
491:talk
467:talk
463:Whpq
440:talk
419:talk
415:Whpq
386:Keep
371:talk
367:Whpq
352:talk
333:talk
276:talk
256:Keep
244:talk
229:Note
218:talk
203:Note
192:talk
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:keep
504:Pnm
329:Pnm
238:--
212:--
177:TWL
114:– (
510:)
502:--
493:)
469:)
442:)
421:)
403:,
400:,
397:,
394:,
391:,
373:)
354:)
335:)
278:)
246:)
235:.
220:)
209:.
194:)
186:--
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
506:(
489:(
465:(
438:(
417:(
369:(
350:(
331:(
274:(
242:(
216:(
190:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.