449:
may not be verified by a secondary source. The subject's age is cited in the
Philadelphia Business Journal article "If you need a rolls". I will add the "Behind the facade" article. I would also note that yesterday I also added the citation regarding Drexel, which is not necessarily a positive article as it appears to be about a lawsuit against the subject by a casino. I can only speak for my editing, and have no intention to repost the uncited information. Until (Cindy) made the edits on Mar 30, 2014, showing cites were needed, because I am not an experienced editor. I do not believe I have violated
817:
the facade". The subject has not been charged with any crime, whether tax evasion, illicit campaign contributions, fraud, mismanagement of school funds, or fraud. You appear to be talking about allegations, most of which are in one article "behind the facade". The article does not actually say he is accused of mismanagement of funds, its saying that someone wrote a check to his company which was allegedly misused. The article was written two years ago, and he has not been charged.
1093:
referring this to Afd. In addition, Valeom cites "is not news" is not on point. Knowledge considers enduring notability. The subject article has citations from
February/March 2012 and September 2012 and 10+ citations from March/April 2014. It is clear that for some reason Valeom is biased in this matter and began this discussion for disruption purposes. While some of the information in this article may belong at
388:) pointed out the policy, I have not done so since. I agree with you that if an established editor chose to recreate this article without any promotion material, the article would be fine. Or, if the lawsuit favors Fattah. I believe SPA policy talks about assuming good faith. All I am asking for is to not improperly determine there was any bad faith by myself of any other editor in accordance with
368:
is not the main reason for deleting this article. We should not write promotional articles about ourselves or a close associate. Because this article has an extreme conflict of interest it should be deleted. If an established editor choose to recreate this article with all the cruft removed I have no
901:
The media coverage does appear to portray Fattah Jr. as a good citizen regarding the lawsuit, and the articles about his business, American
Royalty. I don't actually see anything in the article about the subject's investments, so I am not sure what you are talking about. I will attempt a rewrite and
448:
Valeom, I removed the uncited information in the interest of neutrality. Rittenhouse
Magazine, and their website, are no longer in operation, so providing a link at this time is not possible. The other uncited information, such as the subject grew up in "West Philadelphia" in the "Overbrook section"
816:
I think what are you saying is mostly clear. However (Cindy), an established editor, made the change saying the subject is notable for "suing the IRS". Fattah Jr's company is mentioned in several of the news articles as is the value of the $ 450,000 contract, see philly.com "FBI Seizes" and "behind
761:
The article further claimed that he was a notable entrepreneur with no sources citing that. In truth everything about Fattah Jr. is merely accusations. He is accusing the IRS of "damages for lost income and damage to his reputation", but yet the article has no mention of accusations against him. He
1138:
Just to let you know this does not work on
Knowledge, AfD is not a vote all established editors have consented against this article, sockpuppet and votestacking is pointless, I have not withdraw my nomination, I've changed it to a redirect which definitely needs to be protected. Also I've reedited
779:
Essentially this article victimizes Fattah Jr. portraying him as a good citizen being bullied by the IRS which is far from what sources actually say. In reality, his company should be at the end of the article, his lawsuit should have less mention, and the rest, everything I mentioned above. So it
751:
and you will get an idea of all the issues. It is fairly obvious that the creator and almost every IP editor who expanded the article has a conflict of interest and may be the subject himself or a close associate. The entire article is wrong from the beginning and claims that Fattah Jr. is notable
699:
The subject also has been in a years long dispute with the federal government according to media reports, prior to the recent lawsuit. I have contributed to a few other articles over the years. Articles about politicians in
Philadelphia, councilmen/women, congresspeople and in some cases national
392:
policy. According to SPA, "Existing editors must assume good faith concerning the user account, act fairly, civilly, not bite newcomers, and remember everyone was new at some time. Care is needed if addressing single-purpose accounts on their edits." Regardless of the outcome of this discussion,
303:
Also, the subject's IRS lawsuit was filed in March 2014, and references , , , , , , , are news articles that have been written in the past 45 days. I do not think it is clear based on this that wikipedia has been used to push sources of the subject's to the front page of search engines. Those
1092:
Valeom's nomination of this article for the Afd process was in bad-faith. The Forbes article, article citation which he reference in his comment above was cited as his reason for changing from speedy/strong delete and salt originally to today redirect was already on the article prior to his
218:. It is regrettable that this person was able to get away with this for nearly six years. In fact he has been freeriding Knowledge to make himself more notable and has pushed sources of himself up to the front page of search engines. This is the very thing we are trying to prevent so
304:
references are from highly trafficked websites, such as philly.com, and phillymag.com, which organically appear high in search results. Philly.com is one of the most popular news sites in
Philadelphia, and has a high number of unique visitors, one factor in search engine placement.
210:). Zero accomplishments besides, from what I see as, an attempt to sue the IRS and claim harassment (very common occurrence). This article can be revisited if the outcome favors him, but until then this is absolutely trivial. All expansive edits were done by
1256:
I would say it's borderline, but given our efforts to be cautious in regards to BLPs I think it would be best to delete this subject at this point. There is not substantial coverage in reliable independent sources except for one event that is controversial.
271:
All references are news, except 7 and 8, which appear to be opinion pieces. If the dropbox referenced pdf files , are a violation of wikipedia policy on conflict of interest, they should be changed to the web version of the same news articles. See links,
1242:
Upon further review, due a possible guilt by association on Chaka Fattah Sr. who is as far as I can tell uninvolved, there is no reason to mention the investigation, therefore no reason to redirect. I am maintaining the original delete and salt stance.
598:. Since I do not have significant experience as an editor, please give specific examples or direction on what changes should definitely be included. I can make an attempt, and maybe you can assist me in making sure it conforms with all the guidelines.
1278:
under BLP All the material is negative, tho sourced, all of it concerns allegations & investigations, not convictions, all of it is relatively minor. I suspect the Phila newspapers covered it because of his father; I don't think we do that.
694:
I'm interested in the subject because I have an interest in issues such as government, education and small business. The subject is a business owner, family member of a U.S. Rep., and previously worked in alternative education in
Pennsylvania.
1029:
The article has many references, and has a tv interview of the subject, on 6 ABC, which is broadcast throughout the region. Regional news coverage about the subject is a strong indication of notability according to Wiki
762:
is accused of missed payments on a $ 50,000 loan, fraud, illicit campaign contributions, mismanagement of school funds, and least of all tax evasion (only one mentioned), none of which is in the article thus violating
163:
194:
As one of the most left winged inclusionists, I almost never nominate anything for AfD except when I see a blatant violation article such as this one. This is a glaring misuse of
Knowledge and is a
329:
the article, based on the thirteen news references. If a rewrite is necessary, a verifiable article can be written based on the sources. The news sources are independent and have editorial control.
845:
There is an article about missed payments on a $ 50,000 loan. I will make sure that is in there. There are many articles that show his company had the above contract with a school company.
348:
with no contributions besides this article. IP editors are on a shared IP in the tri-state area, but edits in clumps regarding this article. Prior IP editors have also extensively and
1012:
The subject's recent coverage on 6abc WPVI-TV and 6abc.com make the subject notable, in addition to the independent sources such as Philly.com and The
Philadelphia Business Journal.
990:
970:
157:
282:
It's not clear why Valoem believes this article was written by the article's subject. There is no way to determine if that is true, especially six years after creation.
116:
1319:
I am concerned about an almost entirely negative BLP. I agree with DDG that as of now it is relatively minor. The current situation is perhaps best explained in this
780:
appears that the main purpose of this article is to promote his clown investments and joke of a company. Then it attempts, with bias, to victimize him. Am I clear now?
1139:
the article to be unbiased. I added a wrong citation on Fattah's page by mistake (copied the same link twice) thanks for pointing that out. I've corrected the link.
206:
page. Despite the few sources which are obviously news, there is not a chance anyone would ever write an article on this person except himself or a close associate (
1114:
As shown above, the user who recommended this for articles for deletion has changed his request to delete this article. The subject meets notability guidelines.
214:
and IP editors, can't see anything significant about his company either. The biographical information links to personal dropboxs (citations , , and ), clearly a
766:. Because he is more notable of those things than suing the IRS, they should be the main focus of this article. However, this would not even make news if his
1187:
Relisted as current delete !votes appear to ignore the existing independent sources (Fox News etc.), whereas the keep !votes are not convincing. —
384:
Valeom, thank you for responding. Yes I have made some edits to this article, in the past week. I improperly removed one tag, and after an editor (
123:
873:
There are several references , , and talking about his entrepreneurial activities. So I will make sure any rewrite has the citations in place.
1121:
1098:
1048:
89:
84:
1031:
911:
903:
882:
874:
854:
846:
826:
818:
709:
701:
613:
599:
504:
466:
458:
394:
330:
311:
289:
93:
1013:
76:
178:
17:
500:
492:
424:
145:
700:
celebrities if I see a blatant minor mistake. I have not contributed any entire articles. Most of my edits have been minor.
553:
it means you are saying you are a random editor who has no vested interest in the client and that you are definitely not
256:
coverage which I recommend be protected. I've added all relevant information regarding this person to his father's page.
795:
I think Fattah has been using Knowledge as his personal marketing tool which is why if deleted this article needs to be
1266:
1328:
277:
756:
and his so called "company". I have found nothing that this company even generates revenue and appears to be junk.
139:
1351:
957:
496:
40:
423:
I'm afraid that these could resurface given time. I've also noticed that the article did not have this citation
1125:
1332:
1311:
1290:
1270:
1251:
1232:
1196:
1178:
1147:
1129:
1106:
1102:
1082:
1056:
1052:
1039:
1021:
1002:
982:
961:
944:
919:
890:
862:
834:
807:
788:
717:
659:
621:
565:
512:
474:
435:
402:
377:
338:
319:
297:
264:
234:
58:
1097:
the subject article meets notability guidelines and Valeom should refrain from bad-faith Afd recommendations.
421:
In September 2007, he was named one of the Young Entrepreneurs of Rittenhouse Square by Rittenhouse magazine.
135:
1035:
915:
907:
886:
878:
858:
850:
830:
822:
713:
705:
617:
603:
544:
508:
470:
462:
450:
412:
398:
334:
315:
293:
1017:
80:
1307:
1262:
771:
353:
1347:
1324:
1192:
1174:
419:, which is still an issue. I'd like to note that a lot of uncited information has been removed such as:
361:
199:
185:
36:
357:
554:
72:
64:
1117:
953:
609:
307:
285:
56:
393:
thank you for your time. Note:the below comments were added before your response showed on the page.
1223:
171:
1299:
1303:
1071:
998:
978:
940:
932:
207:
151:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1346:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1188:
1170:
1159:
411:
No one has accused you of bad faith. Not sure where you got that idea. We are talking about
203:
501:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/01/fbi-investigating-pennsylvania-congressmans-son/
763:
748:
493:
http://articles.philly.com/2012-03-04/news/31121573_1_gift-cards-loan-officers-school-firm
195:
53:
273:
1320:
1207:
651:
Why are you interested in this person and what other articles have you contributed to?
591:
534:
385:
369:
problems. If the outcome of the lawsuit favors Fattah we can look at it again as well.
1302:. All possible notability is derived from an on-going investigation and counter-suit.
1286:
595:
548:
538:
454:
416:
389:
365:
345:
249:
215:
211:
1094:
1067:
994:
974:
936:
767:
245:
1323:
article. As this unfolds, it may in the future belong in Knowledge, but not now.
110:
1244:
1140:
1075:
800:
781:
652:
558:
428:
370:
278:
http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2007/05/21/story13.html?page=all
257:
227:
935:
for a topic to be notable. No evidence is presented of anything of the sort.
497:
http://articles.philly.com/2012-02-29/news/31111091_1_agents-fbi-investigation
364:. Your IP has also edited this article in clumps and improperly removed tags.
1162:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
1070:
per sources. The sources mentioned by the IP editor are news and Knowledge
590:
Yes, you are correct. Let me know if you want me to attempt to correct the
551:
and would hope that an established editor chooses to rewrite this article."
457:
and would hope that an established editor chooses to rewrite this article.
1281:
931:. Reliable news sources can be used to bolster an existing article, but
533:
Even after you added those citations, the article still shows tons of
253:
1047:
The subject meets the notability guidelines based on the citations.
696:
1340:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
541:
I'll give you a chance to correct it. I assume when you say
799:
for good measure. It been a good run, but it ends now.
106:
102:
98:
1169:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
274:
http://www.blackenterprise.com/mag/the-personal-touch/
170:
770:
who actually is notable, was not a politician. Since
427:
which may be relevant in the interest of neutrality.
991:
list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions
971:list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1354:). No further edits should be made to this page.
425:Behind the facade, troubles rose for Fattah son
184:
8:
989:Note: This debate has been included in the
969:Note: This debate has been included in the
244:I am amending this delete to a redirect to
1066:I've amended this delete to a redirect to
988:
968:
747:there should be no offense. First look at
1074:. I've updated all relevant information.
743:Okay if you insist and since you are not
344:But there is. The creating account is an
226:, obviously this person will try again.
774:this person is simply of no interest.
352:edited this article such as this one
7:
491:Valeom, I added "Behind the facade"
252:that he does warrant a redirect per
52:. Largely per BLP-related arguments
543:"I do not believe I have violated
24:
933:we need solid independent sources
503:- in the interest of neutrality.
325:I believe the community should
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
697:http://www.ydr.com/ci_19988604
606:) 18:32, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
1:
910:) 22:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
881:) 22:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
853:) 22:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
825:) 22:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
708:) 19:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
465:) 15:23, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
952:This person is not notable.
772:notability is not inherited
1371:
1312:01:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
1291:19:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
1271:22:41, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
1252:23:10, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
1233:15:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
1206:as a non notable person. -
1197:04:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
1179:04:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
1148:02:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
1130:02:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
1107:01:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
1083:01:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
1057:00:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
1040:16:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
1022:13:16, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
1003:00:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
983:00:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
962:20:43, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
945:12:21, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
920:23:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
891:23:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
863:23:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
835:23:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
808:22:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
789:22:36, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
718:19:04, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
660:18:44, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
622:18:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
566:18:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
513:16:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
495:, and two other articles,
475:15:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
436:15:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
403:13:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
378:12:56, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
339:12:31, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
320:12:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
298:11:56, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
265:01:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
235:08:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
1343:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
1333:01:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
59:19:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
220:Speedy/Strong Delete
216:conflict of interest
48:The result was
1263:Candleabracadabra
1181:
1120:comment added by
1005:
985:
954:John Pack Lambert
612:comment added by
310:comment added by
288:comment added by
248:. It appears per
1362:
1345:
1325:I am One of Many
1249:
1230:
1221:
1214:
1168:
1164:
1145:
1132:
1080:
805:
786:
745:Chaka Fattah Jr.
657:
624:
563:
557:. Am I correct?
555:Chaka Fattah Jr.
545:WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY
451:WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY
433:
413:WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY
375:
322:
300:
262:
232:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
73:Chaka Fattah Jr.
65:Chaka Fattah Jr.
34:
1370:
1369:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1352:deletion review
1341:
1245:
1224:
1215:
1208:
1157:
1141:
1115:
1076:
902:then we'll see.
801:
782:
653:
607:
559:
429:
371:
360:, and this one
327:Keep and Expand
305:
283:
258:
228:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1368:
1366:
1357:
1356:
1336:
1335:
1314:
1293:
1273:
1254:
1236:
1235:
1200:
1199:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1166:
1165:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1122:71.230.108.152
1099:166.137.12.107
1087:
1086:
1049:166.137.12.107
1007:
1006:
986:
965:
964:
947:
925:
924:
923:
922:
896:
895:
894:
893:
868:
867:
866:
865:
840:
839:
838:
837:
811:
810:
792:
791:
776:
775:
758:
757:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
441:
440:
439:
438:
406:
405:
381:
380:
354:71.230.108.152
269:
268:
200:WP:SELFPROMOTE
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1367:
1355:
1353:
1349:
1344:
1338:
1337:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1283:
1277:
1274:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1248:
1241:
1238:
1237:
1234:
1231:
1229:
1228:
1227:→Talk to me!→
1222:
1220:
1219:
1213:
1212:
1205:
1202:
1201:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1167:
1163:
1161:
1156:
1155:
1149:
1146:
1144:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1091:
1085:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1032:50.243.42.187
1028:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
987:
984:
980:
976:
972:
967:
966:
963:
959:
955:
951:
948:
946:
942:
938:
934:
930:
927:
926:
921:
917:
913:
912:166.205.55.30
909:
905:
904:166.205.55.30
900:
899:
898:
897:
892:
888:
884:
883:166.205.55.30
880:
876:
875:166.205.55.30
872:
871:
870:
869:
864:
860:
856:
855:166.205.55.30
852:
848:
847:166.205.55.30
844:
843:
842:
841:
836:
832:
828:
827:166.205.55.30
824:
820:
819:166.205.55.30
815:
814:
813:
812:
809:
806:
804:
798:
794:
793:
790:
787:
785:
778:
777:
773:
769:
765:
760:
759:
755:
754:Suing the IRS
750:
746:
742:
739:
738:
719:
715:
711:
710:166.205.55.38
707:
703:
702:166.205.55.38
698:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
661:
658:
656:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
623:
619:
615:
614:166.205.55.20
611:
605:
601:
600:166.205.55.20
597:
593:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
567:
564:
562:
556:
552:
550:
546:
540:
536:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
514:
510:
506:
505:166.205.55.28
502:
498:
494:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
476:
472:
468:
467:166.205.55.16
464:
460:
459:166.205.55.16
456:
452:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
437:
434:
432:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
409:
408:
407:
404:
400:
396:
395:166.205.55.22
391:
387:
383:
382:
379:
376:
374:
367:
363:
362:72.44.134.178
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
331:166.205.55.19
328:
323:
321:
317:
313:
312:166.205.55.19
309:
301:
299:
295:
291:
290:166.205.55.19
287:
280:
279:
275:
267:
266:
263:
261:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:
237:
236:
233:
231:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1342:
1339:
1316:
1304:Stuartyeates
1295:
1280:
1275:
1258:
1246:
1239:
1226:
1225:
1217:
1216:
1210:
1209:
1203:
1158:
1142:
1116:— Preceding
1111:
1110:
1095:Chaka Fattah
1089:
1088:
1077:
1068:Chaka Fattah
1063:
1062:
1044:
1043:
1026:
1025:
1009:
1008:
949:
928:
802:
796:
783:
753:
744:
740:
654:
608:— Preceding
560:
542:
430:
420:
372:
358:68.81.70.199
349:
326:
324:
306:— Preceding
302:
284:— Preceding
281:
270:
259:
246:Chaka Fattah
241:
240:
229:
223:
219:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1300:WP:BLPCRIME
1189:Crisco 1492
1171:Crisco 1492
1112:Speedy keep
1090:Speedy keep
1072:is not news
1030:guidelines.
1014:12.30.250.6
752:because of
158:free images
208:WP:NOTNEWS
54:j⚛e decker
1348:talk page
995:• Gene93k
975:• Gene93k
204:WP:VANITY
37:talk page
1350:or in a
1321:Politico
1160:Relisted
1118:unsigned
764:WP:UNDUE
749:WP:UNDUE
610:unsigned
308:unsigned
286:unsigned
242:Redirect
196:WP:PROMO
117:View log
39:or in a
1240:Comment
1064:Comment
937:Nyttend
741:Comment
592:WP:BIAS
535:WP:BIAS
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
1317:Delete
1296:Delete
1276:Delete
1259:Delete
1247:Valoem
1211:→Davey
1204:Delete
1143:Valoem
1078:Valoem
950:Delete
929:Delete
803:Valoem
797:salted
784:Valoem
768:father
655:Valoem
596:WP:COI
561:Valoem
549:WP:COI
539:WP:COI
499:&
455:WP:COI
431:Valoem
417:WP:COI
373:Valoem
366:WP:GNG
350:solely
276:&
260:Valoem
254:Forbes
250:WP:GNG
230:Valoem
202:, and
136:Google
94:delete
50:delete
1287:talk
1218:2010→
386:Cindy
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
1329:talk
1308:talk
1298:per
1267:talk
1193:talk
1175:talk
1126:talk
1103:talk
1053:talk
1045:Keep
1036:talk
1027:Keep
1018:talk
1010:Keep
999:talk
979:talk
958:talk
941:talk
916:talk
908:talk
887:talk
879:talk
859:talk
851:talk
831:talk
823:talk
714:talk
706:talk
618:talk
604:talk
594:and
537:and
509:talk
471:talk
463:talk
415:and
399:talk
335:talk
316:talk
294:talk
224:Salt
222:and
212:SPAs
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
1282:DGG
547:or
453:or
390:SPA
346:SPA
186:TWL
115:– (
1331:)
1310:)
1289:)
1269:)
1261:.
1195:)
1177:)
1128:)
1105:)
1055:)
1038:)
1020:)
1001:)
993:.
981:)
973:.
960:)
943:)
918:)
889:)
861:)
833:)
716:)
620:)
511:)
473:)
401:)
356:,
337:)
318:)
296:)
198:,
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
1327:(
1306:(
1285:(
1265:(
1191:(
1173:(
1124:(
1101:(
1051:(
1034:(
1016:(
997:(
977:(
956:(
939:(
914:(
906:(
885:(
877:(
857:(
849:(
829:(
821:(
712:(
704:(
616:(
602:(
507:(
469:(
461:(
397:(
333:(
314:(
292:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.