Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat - Knowledge

Source 📝

694:
have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing"
623:
redirect hasnt been tried in this particular instance, but it is my experience with these "soon to be released" TV shows that any attempt to convert them to redirects is undone in a matter of hours. and so without some formal establishment of community consensus via an AfD or RfC, its simply an edit
719:
Using the deleted content for a merge is not the only benefit. Another example is that in the future if sources surface that demonstrate notability, the deleted content can be easily reviewed. Without needing to ask an admin, a non-admin could determine whether the deleted content could be used as
474:, upcoming when? Neither source gives a date for the premier, which means we may have this article in its current state for a long time. Just because a program LOOKS promising doesn't mean that it should have a placeholder until it is SHOWN to be successful. 599:
Of course it is, but I also know AfD touches only a random selection of articles like this, we simply do not have the manpower currently to neatly redirect and then resurrect Indian TV series articles. As it is, most of these articles are in in poor
712:
The only benefit of keeping the edit history deleted that I can see would be to prevent users from undoing the redirect and restoring the deleted content. But this is easily remedied by reverting the restoration and fully protecting the
173: 695:
production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography
564:: It is probably a bit premature, but is deletion really going to help matters? If we can't simply wait, it could be redirected to the network to allow easy resurrection when the show debuts.-- 323: 167: 126: 374: 99: 94: 103: 389: 317: 86: 520:: Is there no way this could be merged or redirected? It seems like it would be a useful search term, and I don't really see how this is promotional yet. 705: 723:
In sum, the benefits of restoring the deleted content outweigh the negligible negatives, so the article's history should be restored under the redirect.
133: 293:
in addition to the above reasons, the author of the page has been continually reverted for unambiguous advertising to Facebook pages and the like.
211:. The article is about a show that has not yet aired and hasn't garnered any significant notability yet. The article is also poorly sourced. 744: 670: 333: 51: 188: 155: 716:
A benefit of restoring the article's history would be to allow non-admins to see what the encyclopedia once said about the subject.
311: 328:. Don't know how reliable the former two are, but they both contribute coverage that could make this more than a stub. If not, 90: 17: 356:
While I can agree with a redirect, those three sources are almost identical (potentially taken from the same press release).
149: 756: 734: 704:
The history should be preserved under the redirect to allow easy resurrection, as noted by Milowent and 23W. As I wrote at
651: 633: 609: 594: 573: 541: 527: 507: 483: 461: 444: 423: 396: 381: 365: 347: 302: 280: 245: 219: 68: 268: 676: 145: 82: 74: 195: 775: 747:
seems most appropriate at this stage and allows later for easy expansion of the article if the show goes live. --
625: 499: 237: 40: 517: 771: 687: 393: 378: 161: 36: 421: 64: 748: 181: 752: 726: 590: 537: 479: 440: 361: 298: 212: 457: 261: 208: 204: 56: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
770:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
730: 407: 452:
This is an upcoming TV series. The sources from Times Of India and Colors TV look reliable
702:
I didn't find anything in the sources indicating that principal photography has commenced.
418: 337: 60: 720:
the basis of a newly recreated article with the new sources. Deletion would hinder this.
490:
And the "reliable" looking colors TV is obviously promoting a show on itself so is not
644: 618: 602: 586: 582: 566: 533: 521: 513: 475: 436: 357: 341: 294: 229: 677:
Knowledge:Notability (films)#Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films
683: 495: 471: 453: 254: 233: 120: 410:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
232:
as well (applicable even if its a TV show and not a film). redirect to
585:, redirection is a perfectly acceptable outcome of an AfD discussion. 494:
a necessary requirement for a source that is being used to establish
310:. Eh, has some significant coverage in secondary sources, including 59:. Any content worth merging is available in the article history. 764:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
706:
Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2014 July 19#Westshore Town Centre
116: 112: 108: 180: 496:
whether third parties have found the subject notable
417:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 778:). No further edits should be made to this page. 673:(with the history preserved under the redirect) 624:war to try and maintain them as a redirect. -- 375:list of Television-related deletion discussions 194: 8: 388:Note: This debate has been included in the 373:Note: This debate has been included in the 642:-- the show is set to debut on January 5.-- 228:no evidence of significant coverage. fails 390:list of India-related deletion discussions 387: 372: 638:Well in that case I'll change my vote to 532:I would have no issues with a redirect. 682:Films that have not been confirmed by 7: 745:List of programs broadcast by Colors 671:List of programs broadcast by Colors 334:list of programs broadcast by Colors 52:List of programs broadcast by Colors 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 757:14:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC) 735:03:29, 25 November 2014 (UTC) 652:15:02, 25 November 2014 (UTC) 634:13:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC) 610:11:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC) 595:09:19, 25 November 2014 (UTC) 574:00:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC) 542:17:39, 21 November 2014 (UTC) 528:00:40, 21 November 2014 (UTC) 508:12:37, 20 November 2014 (UTC) 484:11:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC) 462:10:47, 20 November 2014 (UTC) 445:01:33, 12 November 2014 (UTC) 424:00:56, 12 November 2014 (UTC) 366:11:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC) 236:would also be acceptable. -- 69:18:27, 25 November 2014 (UTC) 397:11:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC) 382:11:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC) 348:23:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC) 303:15:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC) 281:15:26, 4 November 2014 (UTC) 246:03:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC) 220:03:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC) 795: 83:Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat 75:Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat 767:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 629:aka The Red Pen of Doom 503:aka The Red Pen of Doom 241:aka The Red Pen of Doom 725: 701: 739:Agreed with above, a 710: 688:principal photography 680: 319:IndianTelevision.com 699:shooting has begun. 338:redirects are cheap 741:merge and redirect 686:to have commenced 650: 630: 608: 572: 504: 426: 399: 384: 242: 786: 769: 684:reliable sources 649: 631: 628: 622: 607: 571: 505: 502: 416: 412: 278: 273: 266: 259: 243: 240: 217: 199: 198: 184: 136: 124: 106: 34: 794: 793: 789: 788: 787: 785: 784: 783: 782: 776:deletion review 765: 626: 616: 524: 518:TheRedPenOfDoom 500: 405: 344: 313:Best Media Info 274: 269: 262: 255: 238: 213: 141: 132: 97: 81: 78: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 792: 790: 781: 780: 760: 759: 737: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 577: 576: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 522: 465: 464: 447: 429: 428: 427: 414: 413: 402: 401: 400: 385: 370: 369: 368: 351: 350: 342: 325:Times of India 305: 283: 248: 202: 201: 138: 77: 72: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 791: 779: 777: 773: 768: 762: 761: 758: 754: 750: 746: 742: 738: 736: 732: 728: 724: 721: 717: 714: 709: 707: 700: 698: 693: 689: 685: 678: 674: 672: 667: 666: 653: 647: 646: 641: 637: 636: 635: 632: 620: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 605: 604: 598: 597: 596: 592: 588: 584: 581: 580: 579: 578: 575: 569: 568: 563: 562: 557: 556: 543: 539: 535: 531: 530: 529: 526: 519: 515: 511: 510: 509: 506: 497: 493: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 468: 467: 466: 463: 459: 455: 451: 448: 446: 442: 438: 434: 431: 430: 425: 422: 420: 415: 411: 409: 404: 403: 398: 395: 391: 386: 383: 380: 376: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 354: 353: 352: 349: 346: 339: 335: 331: 327: 326: 321: 320: 315: 314: 309: 306: 304: 300: 296: 292: 289: 288: 284: 282: 279: 277: 272: 267: 265: 260: 258: 252: 249: 247: 244: 235: 231: 227: 224: 223: 222: 221: 218: 216: 215:Seahorseruler 210: 206: 197: 193: 190: 187: 183: 179: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 147: 144: 143:Find sources: 139: 135: 131: 128: 122: 118: 114: 110: 105: 101: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 79: 76: 73: 71: 70: 66: 62: 58: 54: 53: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 766: 763: 740: 722: 718: 715: 711: 703: 696: 691: 681: 669:Redirect to 668: 643: 639: 601: 565: 560: 558: 491: 449: 432: 406: 394:NorthAmerica 379:NorthAmerica 329: 324: 318: 312: 307: 290: 286: 285: 275: 270: 263: 256: 250: 234:Ashok Banker 225: 214: 203: 191: 185: 177: 170: 164: 158: 152: 142: 129: 50:Redirect to 49: 47: 31: 28: 492:independent 168:free images 435:Per nom. 419:j⚛e decker 336:, because 253:: per nom 209:WP:SOAPBOX 205:WP:TOOSOON 61:Randykitty 57:WP:TOOSOON 772:talk page 713:redirect. 37:talk page 774:or in a 749:Reinoutr 645:Milowent 619:Milowent 603:Milowent 600:shape.-- 587:Primefac 583:Milowent 567:Milowent 534:Primefac 514:Primefac 476:Primefac 437:Eurodyne 408:Relisted 358:Primefac 330:redirect 322:and the 295:Primefac 291:Redirect 127:View log 39:or in a 690:should 561:Comment 472:NEsha21 454:NEsha21 332:to the 174:WP refs 162:scholar 100:protect 95:history 727:Cunard 679:says: 627:TRPoD 501:TRPoD 433:Delete 287:Delete 251:Delete 239:TRPoD 230:WP:NFF 226:delete 146:Google 104:delete 697:after 498:. -- 189:JSTOR 150:books 134:Stats 121:views 113:watch 109:links 16:< 753:talk 731:talk 640:Keep 591:talk 559:Keep 538:talk 480:talk 458:talk 450:Keep 441:talk 362:talk 308:Keep 299:talk 207:and 182:FENS 156:news 117:logs 91:talk 87:edit 65:talk 743:to 692:not 516:, @ 196:TWL 125:– ( 755:) 733:) 708:: 675:. 648:• 606:• 593:) 570:• 540:) 523:23 482:) 460:) 443:) 392:. 377:. 364:) 343:23 340:. 316:, 301:) 271:de 264:an 257:Ch 176:) 119:| 115:| 111:| 107:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 67:) 55:. 751:( 729:( 621:: 617:@ 589:( 536:( 525:W 512:@ 478:( 470:@ 456:( 439:( 360:( 345:W 297:( 276:r 200:) 192:· 186:· 178:· 171:· 165:· 159:· 153:· 148:( 140:( 137:) 130:· 123:) 85:( 63:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
List of programs broadcast by Colors
WP:TOOSOON
Randykitty
talk
18:27, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat
Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.