284:. State-recognized tribes differ dramatically from one another; it's far more than a matter of bureaucracy, and legitimate tribes gain federal recognition on an ongoing basis. For instance, many tribes in California do not currently have recognition but were recognized at the beginning of the 20th century and were never legally terminated. Unfortunately in the Southeast, there are
295:. Besides the South Carolina Indian Affairs Commission listing them, they only appear in self-published sites, Knowledge (XXG), and Knowledge (XXG) mirror sites, so their notability has not been established. And frankly their claims of Chickasaw heritage has not been established by reliable, published, secondary sources either. BTW
332:
324:
263:
history. It certainly does and we shouldn't have to parse sources to prove its notability any more than we should have to for the
Chaloklowa Chickasaw people (BTW: this should be the name of the article here based upon what I'm seeing working on the indigenous peoples of the Oregon Territory this past week).
322:
I think it is safe to say that this tribal band predates the internet, so one must be careful not to put all the eggs into that basket. The fact that the state Indian
Affairs Commission recognizes the group should end the debate, in my opinion. Just run a search in Google Books for "Chaloklowa" and
262:
of my home
Willamette Valley, for example, are not an extant "recognized tribe," having been absorbed into a tribal confederation and been absorbed through intermarriage into other tribal groups. That does not mean that this First Nation (to use the Canadian term) did not exist and does not have a
384:
As per the cited sources, it's a "state-recognized group." I rewrote the article based on what reliable sources are available, since the article's evidently not going anywhere. Now, at the very least, the information is fact-based.
257:
are a "state recognized group." That's good enough, we're done. The differentiation between "recognized tribes" and other levels of recognition is bureaucratic, historical, and to some extent a function of modern demographics. The
195:
Non-notable organization, article has been poorly cited since 2007 and is filled with spurious claims and original research. Under South
Carolina law, this is not a "state-recognized tribe" but a "state-recognized group."
164:
414:
221:
119:
436:
158:
288:
of groups with spurious claims of Native heritage, many of which cannot be substantiated. South
Carolina has several categories for state-recognition and this group is not a
339:
And so on. We're not here to argue the merits of this claim or that; the fact is that the tribal group exists, and for me that's all I need to advise a Speedy Keep here...
124:
92:
87:
96:
79:
17:
179:
249:- Native American peoples should be immediate keeps in the same way that small countries and their residents are immediate keeps.
146:
510:
as I agree with
Carrite. The state recognition is sufficient for this demographic, regardless if it is a tribe or a group.
234:
546:
40:
254:
140:
527:
502:
480:
450:
428:
394:
379:
362:
348:
308:
272:
238:
205:
61:
136:
83:
186:
289:
542:
518:
476:
57:
36:
217:
370:
Would you accept the word "band"??? Be that as it may, the band is a state-recognized tribal entity.
75:
67:
172:
461:
152:
353:
Of course it exists, but it is not a tribe (as per South
Carolina Indian Affairs Commission). -
446:
424:
375:
344:
268:
230:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
541:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
511:
472:
390:
358:
304:
201:
53:
522:
299:
is the ethnic group; no claim is made in the article that this group is an ethnic group. -
259:
293:
250:
493:
442:
420:
371:
340:
264:
225:
113:
386:
354:
300:
197:
464:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
296:
253:
of the South
Carolina Indian Affairs Commission indicates that the
329:
Voices of Our
Ancestors: Language Contact in Early South Carolina,
535:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
222:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Log/2012 September 12
109:
105:
101:
171:
471:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
415:
list of South
Carolina-related deletion discussions
216:
This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
185:
437:list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
549:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
435:Note: This debate has been included in the
413:Note: This debate has been included in the
434:
412:
292:, but rather a "state recognized group"
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
337:Native American History For Dummies.
24:
323:more hits will emerge: including
331:by Patricia Causey Nichols and
528:03:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
503:23:14, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
481:18:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
451:13:32, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
429:13:32, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
395:23:58, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
380:20:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
363:23:09, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
349:22:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
309:21:19, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
273:18:45, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
239:16:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
62:14:25, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
220:). I have transcluded it to
206:23:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
255:Chaloklowa Chickasaw people
566:
538:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
290:state-recognized tribe
76:Chaloklowa Chickasaw
68:Chaloklowa Chickasaw
214:Automated comment:
48:The result was
526:
483:
453:
440:
431:
418:
241:
557:
540:
520:
516:
497:
470:
466:
441:
419:
228:
212:
190:
189:
175:
127:
117:
99:
34:
565:
564:
560:
559:
558:
556:
555:
554:
553:
547:deletion review
536:
512:
495:
459:
333:ANOTHER MENTION
260:Kalapuya people
226:
132:
123:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
563:
561:
552:
551:
531:
530:
505:
486:
485:
484:
468:
467:
456:
455:
454:
432:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
315:
314:
313:
312:
276:
275:
243:
242:
193:
192:
129:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
562:
550:
548:
544:
539:
533:
532:
529:
524:
521:(note: not a
519:
517:
515:
509:
506:
504:
501:
499:
492:per Carrite.
491:
488:
487:
482:
478:
474:
469:
465:
463:
458:
457:
452:
448:
444:
438:
433:
430:
426:
422:
416:
411:
396:
392:
388:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:
367:
366:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
287:
283:
280:
279:
278:
277:
274:
270:
266:
261:
256:
252:
248:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
229:
223:
219:
215:
211:
210:
209:
207:
203:
199:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
537:
534:
514:I, Jethrobot
513:
507:
500:
489:
460:
336:
328:
285:
281:
251:THIS WEBSITE
246:
213:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
49:
47:
31:
28:
473:Mark Arsten
247:Speedy Keep
159:free images
54:Mark Arsten
543:talk page
443:• Gene93k
421:• Gene93k
325:A MENTION
297:Chickasaw
37:talk page
545:or in a
462:Relisted
286:hundreds
120:View log
39:or in a
372:Carrite
365:Uyvsdi
341:Carrite
282:Comment
265:Carrite
227:Snotbot
208:Uyvsdi
165:WP refs
153:scholar
93:protect
88:history
397:Uyvsdi
387:Uyvsdi
355:Uyvsdi
311:Uyvsdi
301:Uyvsdi
218:step 3
198:Uyvsdi
137:Google
97:delete
498:rowyn
180:JSTOR
141:books
125:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
508:Keep
490:Keep
477:talk
447:talk
425:talk
391:talk
376:talk
359:talk
345:talk
305:talk
269:talk
202:talk
173:FENS
147:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
523:bot
335:in
327:in
237:»
224:.
187:TWL
122:•
118:– (
525:!)
479:)
449:)
439:.
427:)
417:.
393:)
378:)
361:)
347:)
307:)
271:)
233:•
204:)
167:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
496:e
494:K
475:(
445:(
423:(
389:(
385:-
374:(
357:(
343:(
303:(
267:(
235:c
231:t
200:(
196:-
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.