330:. These sources are statutory inspection reports. Every single school in England has one of these as a product of three yearly government inspections of schools. Thus if notability of this school is determined by the existence of the above inspection report, the conclusion of this is that every single other school in England must also be automatically be notable. The existence of publicly available documentation generated at various levels of government related to a subject automatically granting notability is plain absurd. Virtually every major building project in the UK generates many more pages of planning documentation. Most of this is now publicly available online. Does that mean we have sufficient notability to start articles for every branch of
601:- Non-notable.Fails GNG. Redirect might be preferred if it was enshrined in a guideline or policy. But it's not unfortunately. It's just custom and practice that's grown up that is unsupported by anything official. Let's delete and move on. Might encourage acceptance of a decent notability guideline for schools.
417:
Nonsense. The report covers the essential activities and facts about the school - this is its point and purpose. If you're not interested in the school and its performance then this will naturally seem rather dry. But in that case, you should move on to a topic which does interest you; not try to
337:
The government sector accounts for nearly half the UK economy. If we eliminated the government activity on such grounds that it is mundane then this would leave a correspondingly large hole in our coverage of the country. But we are an encyclopedia and so are expected to cover everything; not just
356:
I didn't say government reports are mundane. There is nothing wrong with using a routine government report as a reference, in an article where notability is already established. However,I can't see that a routine (generated by virtue of the subjects mere existence) government report can be used to
478:
While an inspection report is fine as a reference it does not establish notability. There are 16,000+ maintained
Primary schools in England and Wales. Every one of them has an inspection report. To claim that a such a school is notable because it has been inspected is therefore the same as saying
357:
establish such notability. As I have said, the logical conclusion of your position is that virtually every supermarket built in the UK is also notable by virtue of the fact that the planning process generated a number of hefty planning reports.
166:
400:
In reality, the content of the report isn't much use here either. It does little more than confirm the existence of the school and perhaps at a stretch tells us that the school's performance is pretty average.
373:
A planning document isn't such a good source because, by its nature, it will predate construction and so won't have much to say about the life and history of the place once it is up and running. Anyway,
327:
160:
127:
548:
255:
233:
100:
95:
104:
375:
87:
215:: Primary schools are not inherently notable (there are almost 17,000 in UK). This article fails to state why this school in particular is notable.
181:
148:
551:, they are redirected to the article about the school district (USA) or to the article about the locality (rest of the world). --
17:
63:
507:). I am sure that this school is more notable than you think. The school naturally harbors soon-to-be pupils of the high-ranking
610:
590:
560:
524:
488:
470:
453:
410:
387:
366:
347:
314:
288:
269:
247:
224:
206:
142:
69:
518:
308:
499:
197:
Junior school. Appears to be non-notable. Delete (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine) appears to be in order.
138:
629:
281:
91:
40:
466:
441:
188:
83:
75:
512:
302:
449:
423:
383:
343:
462:
575:
484:
154:
440:
The school is notable, per the sources identified by TDW. Note that there is some scope for merger with
625:
36:
406:
362:
220:
202:
378:
seems to have lots of red links so there's work to do there too. So many topics, so little time...
445:
419:
379:
339:
174:
461:
because there's no claim to notability beyond existence being made that would satisfy the GNG.
586:
556:
480:
265:
243:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
624:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
543:
where it is already mentioned, per standard procedure. Non notable schools are generally
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
508:
298:
402:
358:
285:
216:
198:
606:
540:
53:
582:
552:
261:
239:
121:
571:
for closer: if this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the
602:
301:) as it is covered in detail in independent reliable sources like .
504:
331:
618:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
328:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Cleves School, Weybridge
297:: The topic is notable per our official notability guideline (
444:— I have the impression that they were combined previously.
284:; no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources.
117:
113:
109:
173:
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
632:). No further edits should be made to this page.
376:List of shopping centres in the United Kingdom
8:
256:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
254:Note: This debate has been included in the
234:list of England-related deletion discussions
232:Note: This debate has been included in the
253:
231:
549:as demonstrated by 100s of AfD closures
418:destroy this one because it bores you.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
479:that it's notable because it exists.
24:
442:Charlton Kings Infants' School
1:
611:10:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
591:08:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
561:08:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
525:00:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
489:17:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
471:15:17, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
454:10:37, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
411:01:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
388:12:13, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
367:11:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
348:10:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
338:pop records and footballers.
315:01:07, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
289:23:48, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
270:22:49, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
248:22:49, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
225:21:42, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
207:20:58, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
334:built in the last 30 years?
84:Charlton Kings Junior School
76:Charlton Kings Junior School
70:17:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
649:
621:Please do not modify it.
581:on the redirect page.
505:Alternatives to deletion
32:Please do not modify it.
541:Charlton Kings#Schools
326:: Per my comment at
547:deleted; instead,
503:as a last resort (
65:Operation Big Bear
48:The result was
593:
463:Blue Square Thing
272:
259:
250:
237:
640:
623:
580:
574:
567:
521:
515:
509:Balcarras School
311:
305:
260:
238:
192:
191:
177:
125:
107:
66:
60:
34:
648:
647:
643:
642:
641:
639:
638:
637:
636:
630:deletion review
619:
583:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
578:
572:
553:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
523:
519:
513:
313:
309:
303:
282:Run-of-the-mill
134:
98:
82:
79:
68:
64:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
646:
644:
635:
634:
614:
613:
595:
594:
564:
563:
532:
530:
529:
528:
527:
517:
492:
491:
473:
456:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
351:
350:
318:
317:
307:
291:
274:
273:
251:
228:
227:
195:
194:
131:
78:
73:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
645:
633:
631:
627:
622:
616:
615:
612:
608:
604:
600:
597:
596:
592:
588:
584:
577:
576:R from school
570:
566:
565:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
535:
534:
533:
526:
522:
516:
510:
506:
502:
501:
496:
495:
494:
493:
490:
486:
482:
477:
474:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
436:
435:
425:
421:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
399:
389:
385:
381:
377:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
364:
360:
355:
354:
353:
352:
349:
345:
341:
336:
335:
333:
329:
325:
322:
321:
320:
319:
316:
312:
306:
300:
296:
292:
290:
287:
283:
279:
276:
275:
271:
267:
263:
257:
252:
249:
245:
241:
235:
230:
229:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
61:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
620:
617:
598:
568:
544:
536:
531:
498:
481:Tigerboy1966
475:
458:
437:
323:
294:
280:: As above.
277:
212:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
56:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
500:incubation
497:I suggest
403:Pit-yacker
359:Pit-yacker
286:Neutrality
217:Pit-yacker
199:Epeefleche
626:talk page
262:• Gene93k
240:• Gene93k
57:Wizardman
37:talk page
628:or in a
537:Redirect
128:View log
39:or in a
324:Comment
167:WP refs
155:scholar
101:protect
96:history
599:Delete
476:Delete
459:Delete
446:Warden
420:Warden
380:Warden
340:Warden
299:WP:GNG
278:Delete
213:Delete
139:Google
105:delete
50:delete
332:Tesco
182:JSTOR
143:books
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
607:talk
603:Fmph
587:talk
569:NOTE
557:talk
539:to
485:talk
467:talk
450:talk
438:Keep
424:talk
407:talk
384:talk
363:talk
344:talk
295:Keep
266:talk
244:talk
221:talk
203:talk
175:FENS
149:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
545:not
514:TDW
304:TDW
189:TWL
126:– (
609:)
589:)
579:}}
573:{{
559:)
487:)
469:)
452:)
409:)
386:)
365:)
346:)
268:)
258:.
246:)
236:.
223:)
205:)
169:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
52:.
605:(
585:(
555:(
520:✉
511:.
483:(
465:(
448:(
426:)
422:(
405:(
382:(
361:(
342:(
310:✉
293:*
264:(
242:(
219:(
201:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
124:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.