302:. The right approach is to give the matter considered thought, to review these types of articles with TLC and to extract from them the items that do have merit, and with what's left to consider whether a transwiki is a better option than outright deletion from the world wide web. The greatest weakness of wikipedia is the lack of respect that some members of the community have for the hard work of others, and an inability to see - or even to seek - the diamonds in the rough.
219:
I think Eyrian is referring to a general consensus against trivia/pop culture articles. I don't know about that, as I haven't been following that discussion. I agree that the article as it stands is just a list of pop culture trivia, but I think it could be improved. I wouldn't mourn its loss,
236:
This was split off the
Cheshire Cat page for a reason. I agree that it is trivia, and I feel strongly that stuff like this should not be in the main article. If you keep the "pop culture" article, it can act as a lightning-rod to keep that stuff away, and if you delete it, you have to fight a
298:. The nominator is, broadly speaking, right that wikipedia should be purged of inappropriate trivia: however he and the other delete voters in this and a string of related AfDs are
112:
85:
80:
89:
72:
295:
237:
running battle against the "Dragonball-Z episode 99323" cult of trivialists. But merging back into the main article would be really sad. --
76:
119:
Trivia collection, consisting of brief and irrelevant references, without any kind of citation or analysis to be seen. Unacceptable per
17:
357:
338:
322:
306:
282:
266:
253:
241:
224:
206:
188:
168:
150:
54:
68:
60:
193:
In spite of the consensus against that idea? If you're concerned, I'll be glad to watch the main article and keep it clean. --
262:
this crap into
Cheshire Cat - the weight of trivia will eventually destroy the article - as it threatens to so many others.
372:
184:
Yeah, he said "don't merge" back into "there", and I agree with his reasoning; his lightning rod theory makes sense.
36:
371:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
314:
if this closes as a delete would you, instead, move it (protected if you feel it necessary) to a sub-page of
346:
so it can be improved. Nobody has shown why it cannot be improved, why the material cannot be sourced.
250:
194:
178:
128:
143:
263:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
139:
120:
159:
back into
Cheshire Cat... which, after all, was a player in a scene in Lewis Carroll's book.
124:
331:
319:
315:
303:
203:
185:
165:
353:
291:
49:
279:
238:
221:
147:
106:
335:
278:"general consensus against trivia/pop culture articles". Thank, you, Mandsford.
202:
What consensus? You, me, Slashme and Carlos are the only guys in this one.
348:
365:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
290:(without prejudice to later renomination) per the comments of
299:
102:
98:
94:
123:("Knowledge (XXG) is not a trivia collection") and
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
375:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
177:Huh? He just said better here than there. --
296:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Eyrian
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
234:Delete or keep, Strong not merge
164:for reasons listed by Slashme
69:Cheshire Cat in popular culture
61:Cheshire Cat in popular culture
1:
197:18:08, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
181:13:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
131:16:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
55:03:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
392:
358:03:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
339:23:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
323:07:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
307:07:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
283:17:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
267:03:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
254:21:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
242:08:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
225:20:59, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
207:00:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
189:18:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
169:02:03, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
151:18:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
46:no consensus for deletion
368:Please do not modify it.
312:Request to closing admin
32:Please do not modify it.
383:
370:
110:
92:
52:
34:
391:
390:
386:
385:
384:
382:
381:
380:
379:
373:deletion review
366:
83:
67:
64:
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
389:
387:
378:
377:
361:
360:
344:Keep somewhere
341:
332:User:AndyJones
325:
316:User:AndyJones
309:
294:and myself at
285:
269:
256:
251:Carlossuarez46
244:
230:
229:
228:
227:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
172:
171:
153:
117:
116:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
388:
376:
374:
369:
363:
362:
359:
355:
351:
350:
345:
342:
340:
337:
333:
329:
326:
324:
321:
317:
313:
310:
308:
305:
301:
297:
293:
292:User:Melsaran
289:
286:
284:
281:
277:
273:
270:
268:
265:
261:
257:
255:
252:
248:
245:
243:
240:
235:
232:
231:
226:
223:
218:
208:
205:
201:
200:
199:
198:
196:
192:
191:
190:
187:
183:
182:
180:
176:
175:
174:
173:
170:
167:
163:
160:
158:
154:
152:
149:
145:
141:
137:
134:
133:
132:
130:
126:
122:
114:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
367:
364:
347:
343:
327:
311:
300:immediatists
287:
275:
271:
264:Bigdaddy1981
259:
246:
233:
161:
156:
155:
135:
125:WP:NOT#IINFO
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
258:Please do
220:though. --
320:AndyJones
304:AndyJones
274:There is
260:not Merge
249:per nom.
204:Mandsford
186:Mandsford
166:Mandsford
113:View log
280:Bearian
272:Comment
239:Slashme
222:Slashme
148:Useight
140:WP:FIVE
121:WP:FIVE
86:protect
81:history
336:Mathmo
247:Delete
195:Eyrian
179:Eyrian
144:trivia
136:Delete
129:Eyrian
90:delete
157:Merge
107:views
99:watch
95:links
48:. ···
16:<
354:talk
330:per
328:Keep
288:Keep
162:Keep
138:per
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
349:DGG
146:.
142:as
111:– (
51:日本穣
356:)
334:.
318:?
276:no
127:.
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
352:(
115:)
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.