Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Chew lips - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

181:
I've already justified the creation of this page twice before. It was speedily deleted, then recreated, then marked again for speedy deletion, but was then accepted after I provided proof that the entry merits inclusion as it satisfies WP:MUSIC rule #1 - subject of multiple non-trivial published work
244:
Notability seems reasonably well established. Although the band is new and has only released the one album, it seems to be with a major label and they have attracted a fair amount of media attention.
151: 125: 206: 281:- Group has no listing on Allmusic.com, and they include just about everybody. Just one non-charting single release is not enough to satisfy the minimum criteria of 306:
allmusic isn't the be-all-and-end-all though - if there's plenty of other good sources it should stay in. Equally, if allmusic was the
17: 269: 186:
for references. Also, I refute that there is anything self-promotional about this article; I have no connection to the band.
49: 264:- I made an error tagging it with A7 (I removed it shortly after), but I do believe this meets the notability criteria. ∗ 92: 87: 96: 368: 36: 315: 265: 213: 79: 163: 367:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
311: 209: 191: 282: 187: 250: 230: 159: 353: 319: 294: 273: 254: 234: 217: 195: 167: 140: 61: 340: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
290: 246: 226: 57: 208:
gives articles by the BBC, the NME, and on the next page, The Times. Notable in my book
347: 83: 134: 113: 286: 205:
Needs work but thats no reason to delete on notability grounds. Google search
53: 339:. Notability established via the reliable sources on the talk page, meaning 336: 75: 67: 361:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
183: 152:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
120: 109: 105: 101: 225:. BBC coverage seems to establish notability. -- 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 371:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 132:Non-notable, self-promotional band article. 146: 150:: This debate has been included in the 310:source the article probably shouldnt. 184:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Chew_lips 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 388: 255:18:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 235:11:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 218:11:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 196:12:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 168:05:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 141:05:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 354:20:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC) 320:05:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC) 295:04:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC) 274:06:27, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 62:00:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 364:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 312:Dylanfromthenorth 210:Dylanfromthenorth 170: 155: 50:non-admin closure 379: 366: 156: 137: 123: 117: 99: 34: 387: 386: 382: 381: 380: 378: 377: 376: 375: 369:deletion review 362: 350: 160:LinguistAtLarge 135: 119: 90: 74: 71: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 385: 383: 374: 373: 357: 356: 346: 325: 324: 323: 322: 298: 297: 276: 258: 257: 238: 237: 220: 199: 198: 174: 172: 171: 130: 129: 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 384: 372: 370: 365: 359: 358: 355: 352: 349: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 326: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 302: 301: 300: 299: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 277: 275: 271: 267: 263: 260: 259: 256: 252: 248: 243: 240: 239: 236: 232: 228: 224: 221: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204: 201: 200: 197: 193: 189: 185: 180: 177: 176: 175: 169: 166: 165: 161: 153: 149: 145: 144: 143: 142: 139: 138: 127: 122: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 363: 360: 344: 332: 328: 307: 303: 278: 261: 241: 227:Clay Collier 222: 202: 188:bbc_richardb 178: 173: 158: 147: 133: 131: 45: 43: 31: 28: 283:WP:CREATIVE 203:Strong Keep 247:TeaDrinker 337:Chew Lips 76:Chew lips 68:Chew lips 343:is met. 341:WP:MUSIC 126:View log 304:Comment 136:MBisanz 93:protect 88:history 345:sparkl 287:Untick 279:Delete 182:- See 121:delete 97:delete 124:) – ( 114:views 106:watch 102:links 54:Erik9 16:< 333:move 331:and 329:Keep 316:talk 308:only 291:talk 262:Keep 251:talk 242:Keep 231:talk 223:Keep 214:talk 192:talk 179:Keep 164:Talk 157:-- — 148:Note 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 46:keep 335:to 266:\ / 48:. ( 351:sm 318:) 293:) 285:. 272:) 253:) 245:-- 233:) 216:) 194:) 162:• 154:. 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 52:) 348:! 314:( 289:( 270:⁂ 268:( 249:( 229:( 212:( 190:( 128:) 118:( 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
non-admin closure
Erik9
talk
00:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Chew lips
Chew lips
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
MBisanz
05:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
LinguistAtLarge
Talk
05:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Chew_lips
bbc_richardb
talk
12:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.