278:
176:
255:
already exists. This one is indeed an essay rather than an encyclopedia article. The creator should be encouraged to contribute to the existing article if he/she has material that is not included there.
228:
129:
170:
136:
17:
102:
97:
106:
191:
320:
158:
40:
89:
152:
216:
316:
36:
148:
301:
265:
240:
220:
71:
294:
184:
198:
236:
212:
67:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
315:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
58:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
261:
93:
164:
289:
274:
252:
232:
63:
51:
123:
257:
85:
77:
211:
deletion-worthy, but I think it should be deleted as an essay nonetheless.
309:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
119:
115:
111:
183:
207:
I approved this from AFC because I don't think it's
229:
list of Social science-related deletion discussions
197:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
323:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
227:Note: This debate has been included in the
226:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
277:. Unnecessary duplicate article.
1:
340:
266:21:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
241:12:15, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
221:20:49, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
288:duplicate selectively to
312:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
302:13:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
72:00:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
243:
62:
59:non-admin closure
331:
314:
299:
297:
202:
201:
187:
139:
127:
109:
56:
34:
339:
338:
334:
333:
332:
330:
329:
328:
327:
321:deletion review
310:
295:
293:
144:
135:
100:
84:
81:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
337:
335:
326:
325:
305:
304:
296:Rhododendrites
283:
268:
245:
244:
205:
204:
141:
80:
75:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
336:
324:
322:
318:
313:
307:
306:
303:
298:
291:
287:
284:
282:
281:
276:
272:
269:
267:
263:
259:
254:
250:
247:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
200:
196:
193:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
150:
147:
146:Find sources:
142:
138:
134:
131:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:
79:
76:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
311:
308:
290:child labour
285:
279:
275:Child labour
270:
253:Child labour
251:The article
248:
213:Calliopejen1
208:
206:
194:
188:
180:
173:
167:
161:
155:
145:
132:
52:child labour
49:
47:
31:
28:
171:free images
209:undeniably
86:Child Work
78:Child Work
317:talk page
233:• Gene93k
50:merge to
37:talk page
319:or in a
271:Redirect
130:View log
39:or in a
177:WP refs
165:scholar
103:protect
98:history
64:Natg 19
258:LaMona
249:Delete
149:Google
107:delete
286:Merge
192:JSTOR
153:books
137:Stats
124:views
116:watch
112:links
16:<
292:. —
262:talk
237:talk
217:talk
185:FENS
159:news
120:logs
94:talk
90:edit
68:talk
300:\\
280:Pax
273:to
199:TWL
128:– (
55:.
264:)
239:)
231:.
219:)
179:)
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
70:)
260:(
235:(
215:(
203:)
195:·
189:·
181:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
151:(
143:(
140:)
133:·
126:)
88:(
66:(
61:)
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.