302:. Not every actor's career consists of nothing but starring roles in notable productions, and not every film has only one star. ENT does not demand such, and only advises that the multiple roles be "significant"... which I read as being named roles "significant" to plot or storyline", as oposed to credits as named or descriptive and otherwise insigificant background actors. But even without arguing over what that guideline may or may not "mean", we also have
358:
Considering the number of people who have contributed to this article over the last 3 years, the improvements that often follow a deletion nomination haven't exactly flooded in. You would think that when "keepers" have helpfully identified potentally useful sources, some of the creators would pull
149:
184:. A nearly unknown character actor with only nine credits, all in minor, non-notable roles. Heck, one of my exes probably has more acting credits than this. While the productions are notable in some cases (
242:
110:
143:
275:
210:
other than having some film/TV credits at all. But not being an abject failure as an actor, and having some minor work in the field, doesn't equate to being a
17:
228:
272:
83:
78:
87:
304:
multiple secondary sources that speak about the actress in a non-trivial manner, even if not currently used in the article
164:
131:
70:
383:
36:
322:
382:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
181:
307:
125:
313:. The nominator's "ex" notwithstanding, we do not delete improvable articles simply because they need work.
274:
which is a bit strong, but according to the impeccably reliable
Independent she is an "admirable performer"
364:
344:
282:
222:
121:
368:
348:
325:
286:
257:
234:
52:
315:
253:
195:
171:
157:
202:(I pruned a bunch of name-dropping" trivia from it already – "opposite award-winning " junk), has
360:
340:
278:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
303:
217:
74:
336:
310:
299:
199:
249:
49:
191:
137:
295:
207:
203:
104:
269:
66:
58:
186:
268:
Quite a few independent sources out there. She is a "star" according to
192:
multiple cases of in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources
376:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
243:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
100:
96:
92:
156:
170:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
386:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
241:Note: This debate has been included in the
240:
206:, and doesn't even really make a claim of
190:), the roles are not. I'm not seeing
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
359:their fingers out and do some work.
24:
1:
369:00:29, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
349:23:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
309:which gives us a meeting of
194:. The "article" is clearly
53:00:25, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
326:01:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
287:17:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
258:09:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
235:02:24, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
403:
379:Please do not modify it.
204:zero independent sources
32:Please do not modify it.
200:self-published résumé
44:The result was
260:
246:
232:
198:of the subject's
196:just a copy-paste
394:
381:
318:
247:
233:
227:
226:
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
402:
401:
397:
396:
395:
393:
392:
391:
390:
384:deletion review
377:
316:
298:career meeting
221:
215:
117:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
400:
398:
389:
388:
372:
371:
352:
351:
329:
328:
289:
262:
261:
213:
182:WP:ENTERTAINER
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
399:
387:
385:
380:
374:
373:
370:
366:
362:
357:
354:
353:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
330:
327:
324:
323:
320:
319:
312:
308:
305:
301:
297:
293:
290:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:
271:
267:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
244:
239:
238:
237:
236:
230:
224:
220:
219:
211:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
188:
183:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
378:
375:
361:Tigerboy1966
355:
341:Stuartyeates
332:
321:
314:
291:
279:Tigerboy1966
265:
216:
185:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
270:Digital Spy
218:SMcCandlish
144:free images
67:Chipo Chung
59:Chipo Chung
296:verifiable
250:Tom Morris
208:notability
187:Doctor Who
50:Courcelles
214:actor. —
317:Schmidt,
294:per her
229:Contribs
111:View log
356:Comment
212:notable
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
337:WP:GNG
335:fails
333:Delete
311:WP:GNG
300:WP:ENT
180:Fails
122:Google
88:delete
225:ʕ(ل)ˀ
223:Talk⇒
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
365:talk
345:talk
292:Keep
283:talk
266:Keep
254:talk
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
248:— —
172:TWL
109:– (
367:)
347:)
339:.
285:)
277:.
256:)
245:.
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
363:(
343:(
306:,
281:(
252:(
231:.
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.