192:
226:
if anyone wants to do it carefully; a preliminary scan of the google results show there seem to be several genuine news stories in independent RSs (albeit local one) among all the political blogs. There was in fact already a reference, so those saying there were none may not have read the article
227:
carefully--It did not show prominently in a separate section, so I formatted it. the WP article for some reason leaves out what seems to be the reason for the interest--a party switch in 2006 (I added it on the basis of that reference). I wonder who wrote it.
257:). Being a political candidate does not make a personal inherently notable, but it also does not make someone inherently non-notable, which two of the "delete" recommendations
191:
Political candidates are not notable. This politican have not held any national office and have not received any significant press coverage. However, it must be noted that a
114:
121:
Candidate for North
Carolina state treasurer in 2008. No other claim to notability, no independent sources. Only notable (maybe) if he wins, not till then.
250:). The article now cites 4 distinct sources, three of which seem to be independent, and two of which seem to provide significant coverage (
52:
concerns are still here I think, but Black Falcon and DGG's newly presented information is compelling enough to keep the article for now.
214:
No references, vanity piece for a candidate. If it had more references I might be convinced to keep but as written now, get rid of it.
17:
254:
87:
82:
91:
74:
296:
36:
295:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
246:
per DGG. The above "delete" comments were all made prior to the addition of sources to the article (see
279:
267:
238:
218:
206:
183:
171:
138:
125:
56:
167:
notable. I see no indication that being a candidate for state treasurer establishes notability.
275:
263:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
78:
215:
122:
197:
234:
202:
168:
151:
135:
108:
180:
70:
62:
251:
179:
unless article can make some claim to notability and source those claims.
229:
289:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
272:
Note: I have converted the cached references with <ref: -->
247:
104:
100:
96:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
195:shows over a thousand hits for this politician. --
299:). No further edits should be made to this page.
273:tags so that they are more easily identifiable.
8:
134:Political candidates are not notable.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
163:Political candidates are not
316:
280:22:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
268:22:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
239:01:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
57:00:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
292:Please do not modify it.
261:the nomination suggest.
219:20:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
207:10:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
184:05:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
172:04:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
139:04:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
126:03:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
150:Possible soapbox.
307:
294:
205:
200:
112:
94:
34:
315:
314:
310:
309:
308:
306:
305:
304:
303:
297:deletion review
290:
198:
196:
85:
69:
66:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
313:
311:
302:
301:
285:
284:
283:
282:
241:
221:
209:
186:
174:
157:
156:
155:
154:
142:
141:
119:
118:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
312:
300:
298:
293:
287:
286:
281:
278:
277:
271:
270:
269:
266:
265:
260:
256:
253:
249:
245:
242:
240:
236:
232:
231:
225:
222:
220:
217:
213:
212:Strong Delete
210:
208:
204:
201:
194:
193:google search
190:
187:
185:
182:
178:
175:
173:
170:
166:
162:
159:
158:
153:
149:
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
137:
133:
130:
129:
128:
127:
124:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
291:
288:
276:Black Falcon
274:
264:Black Falcon
262:
258:
243:
228:
223:
211:
188:
176:
164:
160:
147:
131:
120:
54:IronGargoyle
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
189:Weak Delete
71:Chris Mintz
63:Chris Mintz
216:Callelinea
165:inherently
123:NawlinWiki
50:Soapboxing
224:Weak keep
169:Resolute
115:View log
203:iva1979
152:Calgary
136:Calgary
88:protect
83:history
181:Montco
177:Delete
161:Delete
132:Delete
92:delete
252:these
148:Note:
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
248:diff
244:Keep
235:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
259:and
255:two
230:DGG
113:– (
237:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
233:(
199:S
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.