204:
I've done some tidying, added categories and a couple of external refs. A civic organisation like this is one for further improvement rather than deletion, in my opinion, and a Google Books search shows it popping up in various publications: not discussed in depth that I can see, but definitely part
185:
Bringing this to AfD as nothing seems to be happening to it at CSD after 30 hours. I feel it is possibly notable, but not written properly as it appears promotional, and is poorly referenced (being polite...). I am not calling for deletion but hoping to get a consensus or a rescue.
154:
239:
This is "Articles for
Deletion" not articles needing cleanup. If the article is poorly referenced, add some references. If the article is written in a promotional tone, recast it using
148:
115:
88:
83:
92:
75:
169:
136:
17:
130:
286:
269:
252:
231:
214:
195:
57:
79:
126:
301:
36:
300:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
222:: 30 hours? We have 8 year old articles that still suck, but are on notable topics. AfD is not for cleanup!--
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
176:
71:
63:
243:
language. If the topic is notable, don't nominate it for deletion. Improve it instead. Thank you.
248:
162:
142:
282:
191:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
265:
210:
53:
244:
240:
224:
278:
187:
109:
261:
206:
49:
294:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
161:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
304:). No further edits should be made to this page.
260:. Obvious good faith, but this isn't the place.
175:
8:
48:. Nomination withdrawn, non admin closure.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
258:Somebody close this already!
321:
287:09:45, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
270:22:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
253:05:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
232:05:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
215:20:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
196:19:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
58:17:35, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
277:as objective achieved...
205:of the weave of society.
297:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
241:neutral point of view
72:Civic Trust for Wales
64:Civic Trust for Wales
275:Nomination withdrawn
230:
312:
299:
229:
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
320:
319:
315:
314:
313:
311:
310:
309:
308:
302:deletion review
295:
122:
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
318:
316:
307:
306:
290:
289:
272:
255:
234:
217:
183:
182:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
317:
305:
303:
298:
292:
291:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:
271:
267:
263:
259:
256:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
233:
227:
226:
221:
218:
216:
212:
208:
203:
200:
199:
198:
197:
193:
189:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
296:
293:
274:
257:
236:
223:
219:
201:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
45:
43:
31:
28:
149:free images
245:Cullen328
225:Milowent
220:Comments
116:View log
279:Peridon
188:Peridon
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
127:Google
93:delete
262:Szzuk
207:AllyD
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
50:Szzuk
16:<
283:talk
266:talk
249:talk
237:Keep
211:talk
202:Keep
192:talk
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:Keep
177:TWL
114:– (
285:)
268:)
251:)
228:•
213:)
194:)
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
281:(
264:(
247:(
209:(
190:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.