376:"it's popular" with no sources cited or indication why that should be sufficient; while it's technically correct that a "consensus" wasn't reached, the closer should have considered the strength of the arguments, not just a vote count. One respondant in the 2006 AfD suggested that the game publisher's link to the fan site conferred a quasi-official status, which I'd dispute, and in the context of an AfD, point out that notability is not inherited from sites that link to a site.
375:
to suggest notability. Individual forum posts have been referenced in a few books/papers, but these aren't sufficient for a presumption of notability. The previous AfD was closed incorrectly, in my opinion: the arguments for deletion cited policy, the arguments for keep essentially boiled down to
328:. For what it's worth, this is widely acknowledged as the biggest and most influential Civilization fansite. That's about all I got, though. I don't see anything more than trivial mentions in reliable sources. Not sure the site's awards are notable in any way.
82:
183:
257:
77:
177:
143:
136:
305:
109:
104:
275:
113:
96:
245:
346:
I didn't find any awards won by the site, or even trivial coverage of the subject in reliable sources. Links might be useful, for others to consider them. ––
263:
251:
371:, let alone significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. It's won no major awards or met other website-specific criteria described in
449:
424:
403:
355:
337:
317:
297:
237:
61:
198:
165:
17:
269:
232:
159:
155:
468:
100:
40:
205:
445:
333:
92:
67:
171:
464:
441:
329:
36:
437:
420:
228:
191:
384:
433:
215:
399:
313:
293:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
463:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
372:
368:
351:
436:
custom Google search. It gets quoted every now and then for news about
Civilization.
416:
220:
57:
395:
309:
289:
130:
367:. Found no coverage in a reliable source on which to base notability claim per
347:
387:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
53:
83:
Articles for deletion/Civilization
Fanatics Center (2nd nomination)
440:, but I guess there's really no other way to vote but to delete.
457:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
282:
126:
122:
118:
190:
394:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
204:
214:No different from other video game fan forums per
78:Articles for deletion/Civilization Fanatics Center
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
471:). No further edits should be made to this page.
246:list of video game-related deletion discussions
415:for insufficient amount of reliable sources.
306:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
304:Note: This debate has been included in the
244:Note: This debate has been included in the
432:. The trivial mentions come from doing a
303:
274:
75:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
74:
280:
24:
268:
1:
262:
256:
93:Civilization Fanatics Center
68:Civilization Fanatics Center
250:
488:
450:10:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
425:09:17, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
404:15:46, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
356:19:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
62:11:35, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
460:Please do not modify it.
338:01:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
318:01:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
298:01:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
238:22:21, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
406:
320:
300:
479:
462:
442:NinjaRobotPirate
393:
389:
330:NinjaRobotPirate
287:
286:
285:
278:
272:
266:
260:
254:
243:
225:
223:
209:
208:
194:
146:
134:
116:
48:The result was
34:
487:
486:
482:
481:
480:
478:
477:
476:
475:
469:deletion review
458:
382:
281:
249:
236:
221:
219:
151:
142:
107:
91:
88:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
485:
483:
474:
473:
453:
452:
427:
409:
408:
407:
391:
390:
379:
378:
377:
361:
360:
359:
358:
341:
340:
322:
321:
301:
226:
212:
211:
148:
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
484:
472:
470:
466:
461:
455:
454:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
428:
426:
422:
418:
414:
411:
410:
405:
401:
397:
392:
388:
386:
381:
380:
374:
370:
366:
363:
362:
357:
353:
349:
345:
344:
343:
342:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
302:
299:
295:
291:
284:
277:
271:
265:
259:
253:
247:
242:
241:
240:
239:
234:
233:contributions
230:
224:
217:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
145:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
459:
456:
429:
412:
383:
364:
325:
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
139:
49:
47:
31:
28:
178:free images
465:talk page
438:I like it
417:Alexius08
310:• Gene93k
290:• Gene93k
222:Johnny Au
37:talk page
467:or in a
434:WP:VG/RS
385:Relisted
216:WP:CRUFT
137:View log
39:or in a
396:Jenks24
326:Comment
184:WP refs
172:scholar
110:protect
105:history
430:Delete
413:Delete
373:WP:WEB
369:WP:GNG
365:Delete
156:Google
114:delete
50:delete
348:Agyle
199:JSTOR
160:books
144:Stats
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
446:talk
421:talk
400:talk
352:talk
334:talk
314:talk
294:talk
283:Talk
229:talk
192:FENS
166:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
58:talk
54:Deor
248:. (
206:TWL
135:– (
448:)
423:)
402:)
354:)
336:)
316:)
308:.
296:)
288:)
276:RS
218:.
186:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
60:)
52:.
444:(
419:(
398:(
350:(
332:(
312:(
292:(
279:·
273:·
270:S
267:·
264:B
261:·
258:N
255:·
252:G
235:)
231:/
227:(
210:)
202:·
196:·
188:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
158:(
150:(
147:)
140:·
133:)
95:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.