Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Cindy (dolphin) - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

379:
The marriage still isn't notable. It was just a tabloid and "weird news" story, nothing else. Every day theres stories like this. What about the guy who sat on the toilet in an airplane, that made headlines should he get an article? Just watch any late night monologue and theres a lot of stories like
335:
I understand this will be deleted anyway as wikipedia has changed and the delete voters pragade have become more of a force and this will result in wikipedia's downfall. This was always a borderline keep but if some of the other very notable stuff gets deleted then I have no doubt this will to, which
129:. A dolphin "married" a woman, this article is about the dolphin. This was nothing more than a tabloid story and something found in the "Weird News" section. I do not see how this event is signifanct enough to be in a encyclopedia. The article about the woman was already deleted 350:
I the article on Sharon Tendler contained the exact same information that this article has. What makes the dolphin notable and not the woman? The wedding itself is what got the headlines, not the woman or the dolphin. --
328:). So the delete vote based on the fact that Sharon Tendler was deleted is irrelevent (besides she was NOT notable, the Dolphin IS). The arguments in those delete vote were more meaningful than the votes presented here. 154:(biographies of living dolphins). Interesting story, but it is clearly a one-shot job -- no news coverage for the happily "married" woman or her cetacean groom after their, um, marriage. 365:
Then rename it to Dolphin/Human marriage or something more appropiate. More to the point this article that contained less information than it does now got kept twice. What changes?
132:. The last AFD for the article was around when this story was in news. Anyways the dolphin gets an article but not the woman? That makes no sense. Neither are notable. -- 118: 321:, I don't give a toss anymore and I know the delete pragade will get their way...but this article was nominated for deletion TWICE and one was No consensus (keep) 251: 325: 280: 85: 80: 89: 221: 72: 17: 198: 459: 36: 458:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
433: 322: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
441: 416: 389: 374: 360: 345: 309: 289: 284: 263: 242: 225: 208: 185: 164: 141: 54: 130: 385: 356: 137: 370: 341: 305: 238: 181: 412: 76: 49: 426: 155: 151: 126: 381: 352: 326:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cindy_the_Dolphin_%282nd_nomination%29
133: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
407:
This belongs in News of the Weird, not WP. "The porpoise is laughing...good-bye...good-bye"
424:. Its a cute news story, but Knowledge isn't a newspaper. It's an encyclopedia, remember? 366: 337: 301: 259: 234: 217: 177: 408: 68: 60: 176:: Actually, there was news coverage for the Dolphin's death as presented in the article. 276: 106: 255: 300:
The sources are defintley reliable. MSNBC, Fox News etc are reliable sources.
203: 452:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
197:
the article and put the bride back into her straitjacket...
113: 102: 98: 94: 380:this, non of them suitable for an encyclopedia. -- 272:. There are decent sources for verifiability, but 233:this reject from the Weekly World News. WP:BLD1E. 216:As a NN offbeat news story. On a side note: ick. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 462:). No further edits should be made to this page. 252:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Sharon Tendler 8: 336:is kind of sad in a way. But there you go. 7: 324:and the other was a straight keep [ 24: 48:. WP:RECENT, WP:NOT#NEWS, etc. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 479: 455:Please do not modify it. 442:19:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC) 417:23:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 390:21:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 375:21:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 361:21:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 346:21:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 310:21:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 293:05:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 290:17:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 264:02:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 243:01:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 226:00:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 209:23:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 186:21:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 165:23:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 142:23:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 55:23:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 274:what if they are wrong? 125:A good example of 44:The result was 224: 162: 470: 457: 440: 436: 429: 277:Knowledge is not 220: 206: 201: 160: 158: 157:Ten Pound Hammer 116: 110: 92: 34: 478: 477: 473: 472: 471: 469: 468: 467: 466: 460:deletion review 453: 439: 434: 427: 425: 204: 199: 156: 112: 83: 69:Cindy (dolphin) 67: 64: 61:Cindy (dolphin) 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 476: 474: 465: 464: 447: 445: 444: 431: 428:coccyx bloccyx 419: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 330: 329: 315: 314: 313: 312: 295: 294: 279:a newspaper. 266: 245: 228: 211: 191: 190: 189: 188: 168: 167: 161:and his otters 123: 122: 63: 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 475: 463: 461: 456: 450: 449: 448: 443: 438: 437: 430: 423: 420: 418: 414: 410: 406: 403: 402: 391: 387: 383: 378: 377: 376: 372: 368: 364: 363: 362: 358: 354: 349: 348: 347: 343: 339: 334: 333: 332: 331: 327: 323: 320: 317: 316: 311: 307: 303: 299: 298: 297: 296: 292: 291: 286: 282: 281:69.140.152.55 278: 275: 271: 267: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 246: 244: 240: 236: 232: 229: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212: 210: 207: 202: 196: 193: 192: 187: 183: 179: 175: 172: 171: 170: 169: 166: 159: 153: 149: 146: 145: 144: 143: 139: 135: 131: 128: 120: 115: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65: 62: 59: 57: 56: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 454: 451: 446: 432: 421: 404: 382:Coasttocoast 353:Coasttocoast 318: 288: 273: 269: 247: 230: 213: 194: 173: 147: 134:Coasttocoast 127:WP:RECENTISM 124: 50: 45: 43: 31: 28: 367:Englishrose 338:Englishrose 302:Englishrose 235:KleenupKrew 218:Doc Strange 178:Englishrose 409:Ecoleetage 51:Black Kite 435:(toccyx) 119:View log 222:Logbook 86:protect 81:history 422:Delete 405:Delete 270:delete 256:JuJube 248:Delete 231:Delete 214:Delete 195:Delete 152:WP:BLD 148:Delete 114:delete 90:delete 46:Delete 268:Weak 174:Reply 117:) – ( 107:views 99:watch 95:links 16:< 413:talk 386:talk 371:talk 357:talk 342:talk 319:Keep 306:talk 285:talk 260:talk 250:per 239:talk 205:ecis 182:talk 150:per 138:talk 103:logs 77:talk 73:edit 163:• 415:) 388:) 373:) 359:) 344:) 308:) 287:) 262:) 254:. 241:) 184:) 140:) 105:| 101:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 79:| 75:| 411:( 384:( 369:( 355:( 340:( 304:( 283:( 258:( 237:( 200:A 180:( 136:( 121:) 111:( 109:) 71:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Black Kite
23:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Cindy (dolphin)
Cindy (dolphin)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
WP:RECENTISM

Coasttocoast
talk
23:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
WP:BLD
Ten Pound Hammer
23:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Englishrose
talk
21:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
A
ecis

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑