210:
has 3 hits none of which discuss her in any detail, and google books appears to be someone else. So we still have nothing verifiable about her. Her best part is a made for TV movie and I am not persuaded that we will ever be able to produce an article that is a proper BLP. Fails V, GNG, BIO and BLP
208:
341:
gives many false positives because of her common name. Barring other coverage, failing GNG does not invalidate meeting ENT... specially if meeting ENT can at least be verified. I suppose I can spend some time sifting theough the 80 news
311:
its been over 6 months and still no sources and I see that neither of you are able to offer any either. This is a BLP and it needs to be sourced. Something will turn up is not an acceptable argument if there are no sources out there.
176:
77:
254:
224:. Invalid GNews search, which covers only the last 30 days. Recurring roles in multiple TV series. No reason to delete in haste, even though nonprint sources may be difficult to turn up quickly.
413:
170:
343:
131:
136:
72:
207:
Its been 7 months since this was last discussed and there are still no reliable sources out there. Google is a bunch on unreliable sites, google news
333:
can at least be verified through the programs and films themselves... nor is it completely unsourced or unsourcable, else it would have been gone.
104:
99:
108:
425:
389:
360:
316:
306:
269:
242:
233:
215:
56:
229:
17:
91:
191:
158:
346:
334:
279:
225:
440:
357:
303:
36:
439:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
152:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
148:
385:
337:
did make a valid point that your proffered G-news search only covered the past 30 days... but yes, the
350:
296:
198:
184:
401:
326:
291:
95:
421:
265:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
381:
372:
164:
321:
While acknowledging the importance of a proper BLP, I do not think my suggestion toward
330:
322:
287:
283:
238:
Did you find any sources yet or are we still assessing notability by assertion here?
87:
62:
417:
313:
261:
239:
212:
49:
125:
405:
288:
cleanup and improvement through regular editing are surmountable issues
375:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
404:
has been to keep TV personalities with a long record that can be
433:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
329:". It is not entirely unverifiable... as her career meeting
414:
Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Pete_Williams_(journalist)
255:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
121:
117:
113:
183:
408:, even if they are BLPs without proper sourcing, see
78:
Articles for deletion/Cindy
Sampson (2nd nomination)
380:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
443:). No further edits should be made to this page.
400:. While I understand Spartaz's frustration,
325:is any less useful than yours of "delete per
197:
8:
249:
48:. no arguments for deletion MINUS the nom
282:. Actor's career seems to push nicely at
253:: This debate has been included in the
294:is a reason to do it... not delete it.
70:
7:
73:Articles for deletion/Cindy Sampson
69:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
460:
335:User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
280:User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
426:16:37, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
390:00:00, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
361:07:30, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
317:05:36, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
307:04:36, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
270:23:22, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
243:05:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
234:20:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
216:20:26, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
436:Please do not modify it.
57:00:38, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
348:to see which is she.
286:. I further note that
68:AfDs for this article:
292:no one having done so
226:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
402:past precedent here
278:in agreement with
44:The result was
392:
272:
258:
451:
438:
379:
377:
353:
345:and 45,00 G-hits
299:
259:
202:
201:
187:
139:
129:
111:
54:
34:
459:
458:
454:
453:
452:
450:
449:
448:
447:
441:deletion review
434:
370:
351:
323:regular editing
297:
144:
135:
102:
86:
83:
66:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
457:
455:
446:
445:
429:
428:
394:
393:
378:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
309:
273:
247:
246:
245:
205:
204:
141:
137:AfD statistics
82:
81:
80:
75:
67:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
456:
444:
442:
437:
431:
430:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
396:
395:
391:
387:
383:
376:
374:
369:
368:
362:
359:
358:
355:
354:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
319:
318:
315:
310:
308:
305:
304:
301:
300:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
271:
267:
263:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
237:
236:
235:
231:
227:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
214:
209:
200:
196:
193:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
150:
147:
146:Find sources:
142:
138:
133:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
88:Cindy Sampson
85:
84:
79:
76:
74:
71:
64:
63:Cindy Sampson
61:
59:
58:
55:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
435:
432:
409:
397:
371:
356:
349:
339:Find sources
338:
302:
295:
275:
250:
221:
206:
194:
188:
180:
173:
167:
161:
155:
145:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
382:Ron Ritzman
327:WP:NOEFFORT
171:free images
262:• Gene93k
406:verified
373:Relisted
352:Schmidt,
298:Schmidt,
132:View log
418:Bearian
314:Spartaz
240:Spartaz
213:Spartaz
177:WP refs
165:scholar
105:protect
100:history
52:JForget
331:WP:ENT
284:WP:ENT
149:Google
109:delete
192:JSTOR
153:books
126:views
118:watch
114:links
16:<
422:talk
410:e.g.
398:Keep
386:talk
342:hits
290:and
276:Keep
266:talk
251:Note
230:talk
222:Keep
185:FENS
159:news
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
46:keep
260:--
199:TWL
134:•
130:– (
424:)
416:.
412:,
388:)
268:)
257:.
232:)
179:)
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
420:(
384:(
264:(
228:(
203:)
195:·
189:·
181:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
151:(
143:(
140:)
128:)
90:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.