522:
also says, "An independent interviewer represents the "world at large" giving attention to the subject, and as such, interviews as a whole contribute to the basic concept of notability. The material provided to the interview by the interviewer and the publication is secondary.... Interviews show a
537:
The CBC interview is a softball Q&A allowing the
Desjardins to say anything she likes about herself. The interviewer was there just to keep the individual talking, not to introduce their own thoughts. These kinds of interviews are broadly unhelpful in establishing notability. That's all in
463:
As for
Magazin'Art, that's an interview, with an introduction that mentions how she's often mentioned by blogs and webzines : "régulièrement mentionnée sur un grand nombre de webzines et de blogues influents". Those are precisely the kind of sources that we do not take seriously.
335:", is an interview in the style section of the Montreal Gazette, pays attention to her dogs and house and highlights " A cosy sitting area on the second-floor" as "an ideal spot to leaf through a book and unwind." That is not serious, in-depth coverage.
523:
wide range of attention being given to the subject and should be weighted accordingly." It most certainly does not say that interviews are not evidence of
Notability, which is what you and your cherry-picked quotation imply.
638:. I've listened to the whole thing, and there is nothing in that interview that approaches critical attention. It's an announcement for a "live painting performance" at a charity event. This is not "Wachtel On The Arts".
174:
330:
very poor sourcing, large sections of the article are unsourced, and most of the material is written by someone with a very close (if undisclosed) connection to the subject as evidenced by the photos. The only
478:
I have seriously looked through the policies and essays I can find, but I don't see why an interview in a
Montreal art magazine wouldn't count for the notability of a Montreal artist. Care to enlighten me?
390:
It is literally on the first page of the linked Google search. Notability decisions for deletion are supposed to be based on actual notability, not just what is in the article. Thus the requirement in
168:
287:
127:
635:
352:- the article may not be any good, but the subject has been discussed at length on the CBC and by Magazin'Art, both of which are legitimate sources and establish
239:
566:
426:
263:
307:
134:
100:
95:
104:
87:
189:
613:
17:
156:
603:
621:
574:
692:
670:
150:
733:
332:
206:
40:
634:
familiar with the CBC's coverage. In their regional programming, they'll covert the most trivial subjects, like
714:
683:
647:
625:
578:
551:
532:
506:
488:
473:
452:
438:
417:
403:
385:
369:
344:
319:
299:
279:
255:
231:
69:
146:
315:
295:
91:
617:
570:
528:
484:
448:
399:
365:
196:
729:
36:
205:
Most of the sources are simply profiles, interviews or announcements. Granted, I found a decent source
83:
75:
595:
539:
519:
512:
494:
702:
639:
543:
498:
465:
430:
409:
377:
336:
182:
497:
says that "If it's primary, our guidelines make clear that it does not contribute to notability."
643:
547:
502:
469:
434:
413:
381:
357:
340:
311:
291:
226:
162:
524:
480:
444:
422:
395:
361:
267:
243:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
728:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
391:
210:
602:, Canada's public broadcaster, not some fanzine. Problem is, though, I know this program:
63:
53:
408:
Fair point, but google results are not the same for everyone. Why not add the reference?
680:
599:
214:
121:
353:
58:
612:
local coverage in
English Montreal. So much so that we don't even see it in
598:
applies in the way
Mduvekot suggests: this is an arts interview on
722:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
695:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
673:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
376:
I don't see a reference to the CBC. Am I missing something?
117:
113:
109:
181:
360:
cred. Somebody just needs to rewrite the article. :)
701:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
679:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
736:). No further edits should be made to this page.
288:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions
209:, but I don't feel that alone qualifies under
195:
8:
565:Note: This debate has been included in the
306:Note: This debate has been included in the
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
262:Note: This debate has been included in the
240:list of Artists-related deletion discussions
238:Note: This debate has been included in the
567:list of Quebec-related deletion discussions
264:list of Canada-related deletion discussions
564:
308:list of Women-related deletion discussions
305:
285:
261:
237:
7:
429:the CBC discussion that you meant?
24:
614:Category:CBC Radio One programs
596:Knowledge:Interviews#Notability
540:Knowledge:Interviews#Notability
520:Knowledge:Interviews#Notability
513:Knowledge:Interviews#Notability
495:Knowledge:Interviews#Notability
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
511:Yes, but context, though. 1)
753:
443:Yes, the radio interview.
715:02:07, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
70:08:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
725:Please do not modify it.
684:13:18, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
648:21:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
626:20:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
579:01:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
552:15:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
533:01:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
507:00:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
489:23:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
474:23:04, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
453:00:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
439:00:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
418:23:04, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
404:22:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
386:22:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
370:22:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
345:16:25, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
320:11:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
300:11:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
280:00:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
256:00:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
232:00:28, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
394:to do the homework.
717:
686:
618:Shawn in Montreal
581:
571:Shawn in Montreal
322:
302:
282:
258:
84:Claire Desjardins
76:Claire Desjardins
744:
727:
712:
707:
700:
698:
696:
678:
676:
674:
605:All in a Weekend
515:is not a policy;
229:
225:
222:
219:
200:
199:
185:
137:
125:
107:
66:
61:
34:
752:
751:
747:
746:
745:
743:
742:
741:
740:
734:deletion review
723:
718:
708:
703:
691:
689:
687:
669:
667:
227:
223:
220:
217:
142:
133:
98:
82:
79:
64:
59:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
750:
748:
739:
738:
699:
688:
677:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
633:
594:I don't think
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
516:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
420:
373:
372:
347:
324:
323:
303:
283:
275:
272:
259:
251:
248:
203:
202:
139:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
749:
737:
735:
731:
726:
720:
719:
716:
713:
711:
706:
697:
694:
685:
682:
675:
672:
649:
645:
641:
637:
631:
629:
628:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
606:
601:
600:CBC Radio One
597:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
580:
576:
572:
568:
563:
553:
549:
545:
541:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
521:
517:
514:
510:
509:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
491:
490:
486:
482:
477:
476:
475:
471:
467:
462:
454:
450:
446:
442:
441:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
421:
419:
415:
411:
407:
406:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
388:
387:
383:
379:
375:
374:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:decent source
329:
326:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:Coolabahapple
309:
304:
301:
297:
293:
292:Coolabahapple
289:
284:
281:
278:
277:
276:
273:
270:
265:
260:
257:
254:
253:
252:
249:
246:
241:
236:
235:
234:
233:
230:
216:
212:
208:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
68:
67:
62:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
724:
721:
709:
704:
690:
668:
609:
604:
525:Newimpartial
481:Newimpartial
445:Newimpartial
423:Newimpartial
396:Newimpartial
362:Newimpartial
349:
327:
269:
268:
245:
244:
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
130:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
358:WP:CREATIVE
169:free images
630:Sigh. I'm
730:talk page
705:XboxGamer
681:Lankiveil
392:WP:BEFORE
211:WP:ARTIST
56:applies.
37:talk page
732:or in a
693:Relisted
671:Relisted
640:Mduvekot
544:Mduvekot
499:Mduvekot
466:Mduvekot
431:Mduvekot
410:Mduvekot
378:Mduvekot
337:Mduvekot
215:Drewmutt
128:View log
54:WP:NPASR
39:or in a
271:CAPTAIN
247:CAPTAIN
175:WP refs
163:scholar
101:protect
96:history
610:really
493:Sure.
328:Delete
147:Google
105:delete
710:22408
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
644:talk
636:this
632:very
622:talk
575:talk
548:talk
529:talk
503:talk
485:talk
470:talk
449:talk
435:talk
427:this
414:talk
400:talk
382:talk
366:talk
356:and
354:WP:N
350:Keep
341:talk
316:talk
296:talk
274:RAJU
250:RAJU
228:talk
207:here
183:FENS
157:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
608:is
518:2)
425:Is
221:^ᴥ^
197:TWL
126:– (
65:Why
646:)
624:)
616:.
577:)
569:.
550:)
542:.
531:)
505:)
487:)
472:)
451:)
437:)
416:)
402:)
384:)
368:)
343:)
318:)
310:.
298:)
290:.
266:.
242:.
213:.
177:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
60:So
52:.
642:(
620:(
573:(
546:(
527:(
501:(
483:(
468:(
447:(
433:(
412:(
398:(
380:(
364:(
339:(
331:"
314:(
294:(
224:)
218:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
131:·
124:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.