425:, and by 1997 every club was paying for weekly statistical reports, if only for $ 5000 a season. (These days, a full suite of products can cost almost $ 100,000 a season.) In 1998, the company won an AFL licence to deliver statistics, a deal driven by the creation of AFL.com.au and which allowed them to expand.
283:
574:
policy, I'm not really convinced that we're barred from having articles on sports terminology; indeed, we have a great many articles on other things of this sort. This term is heavily used in coverage of
Australian rules football, and explaining its meaning can lead to expansion into a full
292:, which I've added to the article as a reference. Considering that was from less than a month ago and I'm not the best at finding references, I think it would be safe to assume there are more references out there. Also, when you look at all the articles in
409:
You are, of course, entitled to your opinion. Although
Champion Data do provide the stats for fantasy leagues, they are also the official statisticians of the AFL and all AFL clubs. I will quote verbatim from the reference I added to the article
161:
491:
391:? Which it isn't - and Champion seem to be a fantasy football stats provider, yes? So I can see how it might be used in that, although I know nothing about the notability of AFL fantasy leagues. Sorry, it might be notable but
155:
95:
90:
99:
82:
122:
344:
256:
506:
225:
417:
needed a new vernacular for his new stats, and the names he came up with ("Hard ball gets", "The
Clanger", etc) quickly became part of the football lexicon.
442:
OK, "part of the football lexicon". Where? Show me that and I'm perfectly happy. Until then it's verging on the something someone made up I'm afraid.
176:
143:
86:
395:
I can't see anything that makes it so. I'm very happy to change my mind once that notability's shown, but until then I'm still at delete, OK?
522:
137:
243:
78:
70:
584:
548:
534:
485:
451:
437:
404:
382:
364:
332:
305:
271:
248:
217:
64:
498:
17:
133:
539:
They're perfect then! The only question is whether it falls into the dictionary category. I'd imagine that there's mileage though.
514:
510:
183:
580:
518:
599:
36:
544:
447:
400:
360:
293:
490:
Yes, it has definitely entered the football lexicon. Just did a google news search for the term "clanger + AFL" (see
149:
576:
598:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
540:
457:
443:
396:
356:
238:
48:. There's a serious lack of any kind of strong opinion one way or another here despite a previous relist. ~
525:). All of those refs are newspaper articles from major Australian cities (eg Melbourne, Sydney, Adelaide).
387:
OK, so I'd expect to see it in use somewhere - somewhere where's it's being cited for example. So, maybe,
501:), " "Through the game we've ended up with 80 ineffective or clanger kicks, which is just way too high,"
328:
575:
encyclopedia article. As a result, I really don't see any major problems with retaining this article.
422:
169:
571:
461:
388:
315:
195:
267:
232:
530:
481:
433:
378:
301:
213:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
348:
324:
204:
465:
428:
Whether this is what you were looking for in terms of proof of notability is up to you.
343:
Isn't this just a variation on the general term "(s)he dropped a clanger"? (which I get
418:
370:
263:
526:
502:
494:
477:
429:
374:
297:
209:
513:), "produced a quarter that amounted to just two combined goals and 15 clangers" (
116:
476:
this use of "clanger" seems to be ubiquitous, as if just to mock me. Aaaarrgh! --
414:
296:
and its subcats, there seems to be precedent to keep articles such as this one.
347:
for) Unless there's a very specific reference within Aussie rules (as, say, in
517:), "Gilbert found a game-high seven clangers to take his season tally to 21" (
509:), "Eight of his 15 kicks were either ineffective or of the clanger variety" (
473:
199:
49:
318:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
469:
288:
413:
The terminology sold the technology. Reams of data weren't enough -
592:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
521:) and "of the 700 disposals, 200 were ineffective or clangers" (
373:(the leading company for statistics recording in AFL).
112:
108:
104:
168:
369:
Yes, it is a specific type of statistic recorded by
323:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
182:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
602:). No further edits should be made to this page.
257:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
203:- or otherwise, would make an a good entry in
8:
255:Note: This debate has been included in the
224:Note: This debate has been included in the
208:As *not* always, please *do* agree with me.
464:rationale. But now, every time I tune into
226:list of Sports-related deletion discussions
468:to listen to a game, or pick up a copy of
254:
223:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
79:Clanger (Australian rules football)
71:Clanger (Australian rules football)
24:
421:began using the new language on
286:from less than a month ago in
1:
474:The Little Paper (Melbourne)
460:, and I stand by my initial
192:Appears to me that this term
294:Category:Sports terminology
619:
497:had 24 clangers by foot" (
458:Red Prolate Spheroid Thing
365:23:38, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
333:01:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
306:07:49, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
272:02:26, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
249:17:25, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
218:11:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
470:The Big Paper (Melbourne)
198:that should be ported to
595:Please do not modify it.
493:) and got hits such as "
351:) then I'd lean towards
32:Please do not modify it.
585:01:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
549:13:19, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
535:11:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
486:11:23, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
452:11:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
438:11:05, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
405:10:50, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
383:01:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
65:12:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
427:
411:
577:A Stop at Willoughby
570:Reading through the
280:Comment leaning keep
44:The result was
541:Blue Square Thing
444:Blue Square Thing
397:Blue Square Thing
357:Blue Square Thing
335:
274:
260:
251:
229:
610:
597:
349:Error (baseball)
322:
320:
261:
246:
241:
235:
230:
205:Urban Dictionary
194:- is at best, a
187:
186:
172:
120:
102:
62:
34:
618:
617:
613:
612:
611:
609:
608:
607:
606:
600:deletion review
593:
313:
244:
239:
233:
129:
93:
77:
74:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
616:
614:
605:
604:
588:
587:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
488:
423:The Footy Show
337:
336:
321:
310:
309:
308:
276:
275:
252:
207:
202:
193:
190:
189:
126:
73:
68:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
615:
603:
601:
596:
590:
589:
586:
582:
578:
573:
569:
566:
565:
550:
546:
542:
538:
537:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
489:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:I agree with
455:
454:
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
439:
435:
431:
426:
424:
420:
419:Eddie McGuire
416:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
394:
393:at the minute
390:
386:
385:
384:
380:
376:
372:
371:Champion Data
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
345:226,000 ghits
342:
339:
338:
334:
330:
326:
319:
317:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:
285:
281:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
258:
253:
250:
247:
242:
236:
227:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
206:
201:
197:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
61:
57:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
594:
591:
567:
412:
392:
352:
340:
314:
287:
284:this article
279:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
59:
55:
51:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
325:Ron Ritzman
156:free images
200:Wiktionary
572:WP:NOTDIC
466:the radio
462:WP:DICDEF
196:WP:DICDEF
505:said." (
316:Relisted
123:View log
527:Jenks24
478:Shirt58
430:Jenks24
415:Hopkins
375:Jenks24
341:Comment
298:Jenks24
289:The Age
264:Grahame
210:Shirt58
162:WP refs
150:scholar
96:protect
91:history
503:Ratten
495:Sydney
353:delete
282:. See
134:Google
100:delete
177:JSTOR
138:books
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
581:talk
568:Keep
545:talk
531:talk
482:talk
448:talk
434:talk
401:talk
389:here
379:talk
361:talk
329:talk
302:talk
268:talk
214:talk
170:FENS
144:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
523:ref
519:ref
515:ref
511:ref
507:ref
499:ref
472:or
231:--
184:TWL
121:– (
583:)
547:)
533:)
484:)
450:)
436:)
403:)
381:)
363:)
355:.
331:)
304:)
270:)
259:.
228:.
216:)
164:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
579:(
543:(
529:(
480:(
446:(
432:(
399:(
377:(
359:(
327:(
300:(
266:(
262:—
245:0
240:A
237:/
234:N
212:(
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
119:)
81:(
60:a
58:c
56:z
54:a
52:m
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.