205:: I have no opinion on the overall appropriateness of the list, but copyright concerns seem valid if the ABC offered a list of candidates from which the ranking was selected. Coincidentally, I have a question in to our associate counsel at this very moment concerning such survey lists in conjunction with
209:. (If the list were the opinion of employees of ABC there would be no question of copyright; the question here involves when an organization offers a finite group of candidates which are then ranked by survey.) I've truncated the list to the top 5, even though per
167:
270:
247:
161:
229:
which has been running five years longer than the ABC one and has attracted independent coverage in the UK. The only coverage I've found for the ABC lists is by the station itself.
128:
101:
96:
105:
88:
206:
182:
198:
Not notable, and possible copyright vio. Almost entire article is a copy of the list on the
Australian Broadcasting Corporation website.
149:
17:
143:
92:
139:
282:
261:
238:
217:
70:
297:
36:
189:
278:
296:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
84:
76:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
213:
there may be issues with fair use in that, since the top 5 of the list is the most commercially valuable. --
234:
155:
63:
274:
225:
There is nothing notable about these lists. Many classical stations have exercises of this kind, e.g.
214:
175:
257:
230:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
57:
226:
252:
122:
51:
290:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
271:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Classic 100 original (ABC)
210:
118:
114:
110:
174:
188:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
300:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
248:Classic 100 Original delete discussion page
207:User:Moonriddengirl/Copyright in lists
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
246:for the reasons detailed at the
1:
203:Comment on copyright question
317:
71:03:28, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
283:02:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
262:20:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
239:16:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
218:15:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
293:Please do not modify it.
269:for reasons detailed at
85:Classic 100 Mozart (ABC)
77:Classic 100 Mozart (ABC)
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
211:attorney feedback
69:
308:
295:
275:Michael Bednarek
260:
255:
193:
192:
178:
126:
108:
66:
60:
49:
34:
316:
315:
311:
310:
309:
307:
306:
305:
304:
298:deletion review
291:
256:
251:
227:Classic FM (UK)
135:
99:
83:
80:
64:
58:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
314:
312:
303:
302:
286:
285:
264:
241:
220:
215:Moonriddengirl
196:
195:
132:
79:
74:
52:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
313:
301:
299:
294:
288:
287:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
263:
259:
254:
249:
245:
242:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
221:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
200:
199:
191:
187:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:Find sources:
133:
130:
124:
120:
116:
112:
107:
103:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
81:
78:
75:
73:
72:
67:
61:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
292:
289:
266:
243:
231:Voceditenore
222:
202:
197:
185:
179:
171:
164:
158:
152:
146:
136:
45:
43:
31:
28:
162:free images
59:have a cup
253:GFHandel
129:View log
168:WP refs
156:scholar
102:protect
97:history
223:Delete
140:Google
106:delete
53:Coffee
273:. --
183:JSTOR
144:books
123:views
115:watch
111:links
65:essay
16:<
279:talk
267:Keep
244:Keep
235:talk
176:FENS
150:news
119:logs
93:talk
89:edit
46:keep
190:TWL
127:– (
68://
62://
56://
281:)
250:.
237:)
170:)
121:|
117:|
113:|
109:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
50:—
48:.
277:(
258:.
233:(
194:)
186:·
180:·
172:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
142:(
134:(
131:)
125:)
87:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.