330:", etc. Stage reviews are more about the director and/or the story, so for an individual actress to receive even a few sentences of praise, in multiple theater reviews of multiple and various notable productions is indicative of her being worthy of note. It would be nice though to have her earlier theater career expanded.
359:
306:
164:
203:, which require multiple, non-trivial sources in third-party publications. There seems to be little, if any, material that covers her as an individual, as opposed to trivial mentions of her various roles.
271:
220:
Considering her extensive list of roles on IMDB, why should she not be included? It's not as though she was only in one episode of one TV show, she had a long history spanning 40 years.
120:
158:
414:
361:
I agree with User:204.50.33.29 re the acting credits also, she has a list of acting credits going back to 1950s and an article on a character she portrayed
248:
Just want to point out that normally articles on actors or actresses do not need other sources for their acting history beyond IMDB, as far as I am aware.
249:
221:
58:
17:
93:
88:
308:
Not all of the results verifying her work are merely trivial, as she does receive some recognition for her stage work... as in the
97:
80:
179:
146:
447:
36:
357:
339:
446:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
140:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
196:
209:
431:
401:
375:
342:
286:
257:
253:
243:
229:
225:
214:
136:
62:
54:
195:
Contested PROD. My rationale is simply that there is no evidence that she meets the specific criteria of
397:
332:
186:
125:
172:
384:
354:
204:
84:
310:
282:
239:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
393:
302:
152:
367:
234:
So where is that history properly and reliably documented outwith
Knowledge (XXG), then?
427:
298:
200:
76:
68:
278:
235:
114:
362:
387:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
422:
328:
Claudia Bryar is appealing as his wife still attractive but grown brittle...
324:
Miss
Claudia Bryar as his genteel American wife were solidly skilled and...
320:
Claudia Bryar is absolutely splendid as Willy's loving loyal wife...
301:
career in film, television, and theater that meets the caveats at
440:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
316:
Claudia Bryar played Mme
Ducotel with delicate sensitivity...
272:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
110:
106:
102:
171:
392:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
185:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
450:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
365:and the rationale of User:MichaelQSchmidt. —
415:list of People-related deletion discussions
409:
266:
413:: This debate has been included in the
270:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
314:writing in one instance that "
1:
432:07:40, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
402:03:33, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
376:20:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
343:07:43, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
287:17:16, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
258:03:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
244:01:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
230:22:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
215:07:33, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
199:or the general guidelines at
63:06:07, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
467:
443:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
322:", and yet another "
318:" and in another "
44:The result was
434:
418:
404:
311:Los Angeles Times
289:
275:
61:
458:
445:
419:
391:
389:
374:
372:
335:
326:", and another "
276:
212:
207:
190:
189:
175:
128:
118:
100:
52:
34:
466:
465:
461:
460:
459:
457:
456:
455:
454:
448:deletion review
441:
382:
368:
366:
333:
210:
205:
132:
124:
91:
75:
72:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
464:
462:
453:
452:
436:
435:
406:
405:
390:
379:
378:
347:
346:
345:
291:
290:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
197:WP:ENTERTAINER
193:
192:
129:
126:Afd statistics
71:
66:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
463:
451:
449:
444:
438:
437:
433:
429:
425:
424:
416:
412:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
388:
386:
381:
380:
377:
373:
371:
364:
360:
358:
356:
352:
349:
348:
344:
341:
340:
337:
336:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
307:
304:
300:
297:per long and
296:
293:
292:
288:
284:
280:
273:
269:
265:
259:
255:
251:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
217:
216:
213:
208:
202:
198:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
127:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:Claudia Bryar
74:
73:
70:
69:Claudia Bryar
67:
65:
64:
60:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
442:
439:
421:
410:
383:
369:
350:
338:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
309:
294:
267:
250:204.50.33.29
222:81.89.48.128
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
50:Bigtimepeace
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
394:Ron Ritzman
159:free images
363:Emma Spool
299:verifiable
355:WP:NACTOR
279:• Gene93k
385:Relisted
334:Schmidt,
206:Canadian
121:View log
59:contribs
236:Uncle G
165:WP refs
153:scholar
94:protect
89:history
420:-- --
303:WP:ENT
137:Google
98:delete
370:Theda
180:JSTOR
141:books
123:) •
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
428:talk
423:Cirt
411:Note
398:talk
351:Keep
295:Keep
283:talk
268:Note
254:talk
240:talk
226:talk
211:Paul
201:WP:N
173:FENS
147:news
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
55:talk
353:Re
277:--
187:TWL
119:– (
57:|
430:)
417:.
400:)
285:)
274:.
256:)
242:)
228:)
167:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
53:|
48:.
426:(
396:(
305:.
281:(
252:(
238:(
224:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
117:)
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.