188:, POV neologism. I think the argument made is roughly valid (in the sense that I see where they are coming from, not that I agree with them) but it is probably best to integrate it into the main article on the controversy, Knowledge (XXG) sucks when each POV has its own article. --
243:
The debate on whether
Climate Change has been oversold will, IMO, grow in importance. I suspect we'll end up having a separate article on the topic within a year or two even if we merge it now.
113:
200::pov or not, it's a neologism and an article about a scientific topic that only sources popular media (in fact it seems to be mostly based on one bbc story). --
156:. We do not need a separate article for every story on every TV news program about global warming. This has its only source a single such BBC story.
328:, etc etc. The (very little) material in this article that does not already appear elsewhere should be merged into one of those articles.
317:
86:
81:
321:
90:
51:. I'll go ahead and redirect, if anybody wants to do the merge work, the history will be there for you (and many thanks, by the way!).
17:
73:
136:
until the results of all scientific studies on this article's notability are in. Until then, we should take no rash action. --
120:
contested prod. title is inherently POV; an NPOV article can't be written with this title. Merge anything worth saving into
296:
257:
467:
36:
349:
325:
237:
173:
168:
But if you delete it before I can provide enough additional sources to show the concept's notability, then please
292:
279:
270:
253:
466:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
452:
400:
386:
372:
356:
332:
300:
282:
261:
204:
192:
180:
160:
144:
127:
55:
348:. This article seems to be a classic example of what the POVFORK guideline is designed to protect against.
77:
189:
365:
345:
397:
329:
379:
141:
353:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
396:
notice that this is your personal work and does not represent the
Knowledge (XXG) community.
291:
Comment: The blatantly POV material WMC added to the article is now back in a less POV form.
69:
61:
52:
227:
The title is unacceptably POV; something like "Politics of
Climate Change" would be better.
419:
124:
278:
It didn't survive - this page doomed to be yet another in the long series of proxy wars
411:
313:
233:
224:
I've added 2 quotes to the article, so it is no longer "mostly based on one BBC story".
201:
153:
121:
47:
137:
383:
177:
107:
369:
157:
172:
it for me. Or at least give me enough notice so I can userfy it my self to
269:
possible keep, conditional on something like my new intro surviving :-)
230:
The article is currently too one-sided (and I made it even worse).
312:
Similar material is spread across too many different articles --
460:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
378:
Since everyone wants to delete or merge, is it okay if I
103:
99:
95:
322:
List of scientists opposing global warming consensus
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
470:). No further edits should be made to this page.
252:rename it and make it more balanced. Cheers,
8:
392:I won't object, as long it includes a
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
318:Scientific opinion on climate change
236:is the wrong place to merge this.
24:
352:seems to be the right place. --
1:
174:User:Ed Poor/climate alarmism
453:05:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
401:19:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
387:19:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
373:15:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
357:19:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
333:19:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
301:11:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
283:15:43, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
273:14:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
262:13:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
248:If we keep this article, we
205:00:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
193:00:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
181:14:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
161:00:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
145:20:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
128:18:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
56:08:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
344:any surviving content per
487:
350:Global warming controversy
326:Global warming controversy
240:would be more appropriate.
238:Global Warming controversy
463:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
380:Knowledge (XXG):userfy
46:merge and redirect to
280:William M. Connolley
271:William M. Connolley
299:
260:
478:
465:
449:
446:
443:
440:
437:
434:
431:
428:
425:
422:
418:
382:the page now? --
310:Merge and delete
295:
256:
176:. Thanks! :-) --
111:
93:
70:Climate alarmism
62:Climate alarmism
34:
486:
485:
481:
480:
479:
477:
476:
475:
474:
468:deletion review
461:
447:
444:
441:
438:
435:
432:
429:
426:
423:
420:
416:
84:
68:
65:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
484:
482:
473:
472:
456:
455:
412:Global Warming
404:
403:
398:Raymond Arritt
376:
375:
359:
335:
330:Raymond Arritt
314:Global warming
306:
305:
304:
303:
286:
285:
265:
264:
246:
245:
244:
241:
234:Global Warming
231:
228:
225:
218:
217:
207:
195:
183:
163:
154:Global warming
147:
125:Geoffrey Spear
122:Global Warming
118:
117:
64:
59:
48:Global Warming
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
483:
471:
469:
464:
458:
457:
454:
451:
450:
413:
409:
406:
405:
402:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
388:
385:
381:
374:
371:
367:
363:
360:
358:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
336:
334:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
307:
302:
298:
294:
290:
289:
288:
287:
284:
281:
277:
274:
272:
267:
266:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
242:
239:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
222:
220:
219:
215:
211:
208:
206:
203:
199:
196:
194:
191:
190:70.51.228.137
187:
184:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
162:
159:
155:
151:
148:
146:
143:
139:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
126:
123:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
462:
459:
415:
414:, POV fork.
407:
393:
377:
361:
354:Shirahadasha
341:
337:
309:
275:
268:
249:
213:
209:
197:
185:
169:
165:
149:
133:
119:
45:
43:
31:
28:
394:conspicuous
53:Luna Santin
366:WP:POVFORK
346:WP:POVFORK
221:Comments:
202:frymaster
384:Uncle Ed
186:Redirect
178:Uncle Ed
138:Dhartung
114:View log
166:Neutral
87:protect
82:history
370:Addhoc
362:Delete
338:Delete
297:(talk)
276:delete
258:(talk)
214:Delete
210:Rename
198:delete
170:Userfy
158:Edison
134:Delete
91:delete
408:Merge
342:merge
150:Merge
108:views
100:watch
96:links
16:<
364:per
340:and
250:must
142:Talk
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
410:to
293:CWC
254:CWC
212:or
152:to
112:- (
368:.
324:,
320:,
316:,
140:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
448:e
445:l
442:g
439:a
436:e
433:e
430:l
427:b
424:o
421:N
417:—
216:.
116:)
110:)
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.