462:. This AfD probably would have gone more smoothly (or even unanimously) if it had been posed prior to the release of the film. Although I would like to assume good faith, the presumed objectivity of the nomination does come into question. Due to such comments as "irrelevant topical articles", gives the impression that establishing notability is based on the whims and judgement of one editor, who could have proposed a discussion on the article talk page before jumping headlong into AfD. With all that aside, I can see see merit in merging the article into the Doctor Strange article carried out by nominator, who has a habit of deleting/redirecting articles without trying to salvage what information can be used in a sub-article nature (first appearance, commentary by creators, minor reception). Sincerely
437:. I was looking this subject on WP up after reading the following line: "There’s even a great deal of physical comedy, much of it from Strange’s ornery cloak of levitation... Like Guardians of the Galaxy’s Groot before it, this animate artifact will likely prove itself the film’s true breakout star." (
287:
Please do show how a bunch of useless news articles can be used in the context of the article. You won't, because you can't. Weight has to be taken into account when looking at should and can be included in an article. These recent news articles amount to harmless click bait with no substance. Why is
344:
to the powers and abilities section of Doctor
Strange. Despite the high number of hits this term has on google, it's not independently notable and it's unlikely there will ever be enough real-world information to justify a standalone article. If it is kept, however, then a link should be added from
258:
As I explained, they're just irrelevant topical articles that will add no substance to the article. They have no worth beyond explaining a comparatively minor element to the MCU-only fans. "*Random news site* described the Cloak of
Levitation in layman's terms to casual fans" is not a particularly
165:
414:
213:
240:
failure. The above Google News link shows a plethora of references to this fictional element in the upcoming movie and associated trailers. GNG is easily, predictably, and obviously met.
118:
302:
I'd be interested to hear what specific information from these sources
Jclemens thinks should be included, and/or if he thinks the article is currently in acceptable condition.
159:
273:
RS Articles on Doctor
Strange movie are irrelevant to Knowledge (XXG) article on Doctor Strange fictional elements? Truly, a unique and unsupportable perspective.
503:
review of the film, "the Cloak of
Levitation . . . is a pleasure, a supporting player of wit and distinction, emblematic of the best of "Doctor Strange".
125:
196:
This fails to establish notability. The only real sources seem to be topical articles related to the new movie, but they're mostly just irrelevant.
91:
86:
95:
78:
504:
438:
17:
180:
147:
511:
401:
384:
557:
506:
It's not our place here to declare that subjects aren't worthy of the independent critical attention they;ve received.
40:
422:
141:
507:
467:
397:
538:
515:
491:
471:
450:
426:
405:
388:
371:
354:
336:
311:
297:
282:
268:
249:
225:
205:
60:
137:
380:
350:
307:
82:
187:
418:
553:
463:
36:
479:
to Doctor
Strange. It's part and parcel of the fictional character, any notability derives from him.
346:
303:
173:
74:
66:
237:
446:
278:
245:
153:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
552:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
533:
367:
508:
The Big Bad
Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.
398:
The Big Bad
Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.
362:
to the powers and abilities section of Doctor
Strange per Argento Surfer's comment above.
482:
459:
442:
332:
293:
274:
264:
241:
221:
201:
54:
112:
524:
363:
345:
the Doctor
Strange page, which currently mentions it twice but never links it.
328:
289:
260:
217:
197:
546:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
396:
pretty much per JClemens. Nomination is logically incoherent.
288:
it that you cannot just take an objective look at sources?
415:
list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions
214:
list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
108:
104:
100:
172:
186:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
560:). No further edits should be made to this page.
499:: Supplementing my keep !vote, above, from the
8:
413:Note: This debate has been included in the
212:Note: This debate has been included in the
412:
211:
259:important statement. It's just fluff.
523:- an independently notable artifact.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
458:into Doctor Strange article under
24:
1:
539:18:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
516:21:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
492:16:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
472:13:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
451:02:10, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
427:15:40, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
406:10:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
389:23:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
372:19:41, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
355:16:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
337:04:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
312:12:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
298:10:34, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
283:07:52, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
269:02:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
250:02:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
236:and reprimand nominator for
226:12:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
206:12:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
61:01:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
577:
549:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
381:FreeKnowledgeCreator
460:Power and Abilities
75:Cloak of Levitation
67:Cloak of Levitation
490:
429:
419:Shawn in Montreal
228:
568:
551:
531:
489:
487:
480:
464:Subzerosmokerain
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
57:
34:
576:
575:
571:
570:
569:
567:
566:
565:
564:
558:deletion review
547:
525:
501:Chicago Tribune
483:
481:
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
574:
572:
563:
562:
542:
541:
518:
494:
474:
453:
431:
430:
409:
408:
391:
379:per Jclemens.
374:
357:
347:Argento Surfer
339:
327:per Jclemens.
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
304:Argento Surfer
300:
253:
252:
230:
229:
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
573:
561:
559:
555:
550:
544:
543:
540:
537:
536:
532:
530:
529:
522:
519:
517:
513:
509:
505:
502:
498:
495:
493:
488:
486:
478:
475:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:Keep or Merge
454:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
411:
410:
407:
403:
399:
395:
392:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
373:
369:
365:
361:
358:
356:
352:
348:
343:
340:
338:
334:
330:
326:
323:
322:
313:
309:
305:
301:
299:
295:
291:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
257:
256:
255:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
548:
545:
534:
527:
526:
520:
500:
496:
484:
476:
455:
434:
393:
376:
359:
341:
324:
233:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
160:free images
485:Sandstein
554:talk page
238:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
556:or in a
477:Redirect
443:SnowFire
360:Redirect
342:Redirect
275:Jclemens
242:Jclemens
119:View log
39:or in a
497:Comment
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
56:MBisanz
528:bd2412
439:source
364:Aoba47
138:Google
96:delete
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
521:Keep
512:talk
468:talk
447:talk
435:Keep
423:talk
402:talk
394:Keep
385:talk
377:Keep
368:talk
351:talk
333:talk
325:Keep
308:talk
294:talk
279:talk
265:talk
246:talk
234:Keep
222:talk
202:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
50:keep
441:).
329:BOZ
290:TTN
261:TTN
218:TTN
198:TTN
188:TWL
117:– (
52:.
514:)
470:)
449:)
425:)
417:.
404:)
387:)
370:)
353:)
335:)
310:)
296:)
281:)
267:)
248:)
224:)
216:.
204:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
535:T
510:(
466:(
445:(
421:(
400:(
383:(
366:(
349:(
331:(
306:(
292:(
277:(
263:(
244:(
220:(
200:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.