309:. Insufficient coverage to demonstrate notability. A fairly low placing on a genre-specific chart based on specialist radio play is not in my view sufficient to establish notability on its own. Placing in a national singles/album chart that is based on sales would be good enough (in this case the Billboard Hot 100/Billboard 200), otherwise for these specialist charts, anything outside the top 10, while indicating that digging deeper may find something, needs to be backed up by some other claim to notability. My preference would be to only include national charts based on sales in notability criteria, but while a major nation such as the US still has national specialist charts based on airplay, I suppose we have to include them, but only the top 10-20, I think. My interpretation of a 'national chart' would be a nation's main sales-based chart, or one of multiple sales-based national charts in cases where there is not one representative national chart. --
549:- The band may not be major, but I'll second HotHat there as I listed to KLOVE and they placed it quite a bit last summer. That, combined with the top-25 charting on Christian Songs is enough for an article for now. If there isn't any sort of news about these guys in a few years, it may be a good idea to delete.
163:
423:, criteria No. 2, when it states "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart." It does not state that it has to be the highest chart for singles, which would be the Hot 100, rather it means any
286:
116:
603:
how is rotation on K-Love stations being shown in the article? There is a reference to a K-Love page that has some information on the band but mentions nothing about rotation.--
157:
528:
Now, I found that MUSICBIO criteria No. 11, which states "Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network," and this has been proven by
447:
article on here in the first place? So, this means by virtue of the charts notability it lends credibility and notablity to the said article here in question.
123:
258:
The
Christian CHR...and Christian AC Indicator charts are compiled from playlist reports that stations playing those genres of music submit online.
89:
84:
93:
17:
76:
178:
145:
532:. So, now it is 100 percent notable. Furthermore, the song is notable along with the band that sings the song is notable!
733:
40:
139:
586:
397:, I'm not finding anything else that might help here either. Charting mentioned is interesting but does not meet
135:
252:, the Christian Songs chart, among others, is compiled based on audience impressions. More generally, they use
714:
680:
652:
633:
612:
590:
566:
541:
519:
484:
456:
436:
409:
381:
346:
318:
298:
277:
238:
219:
58:
558:
194:
Taking this to AfD for consensus. Is a top-30 showing on a
Christian song chart enough to pass muster under
185:
582:
693:
only lists the top ten tracks. I can't get into billboard.biz either. CHR isn't listed at .com at all. --
690:
729:
648:
608:
405:
375:
268:
226:
80:
36:
420:
249:
427:
charts and they have hit two of the song charts the way that our US national charting system does it.
501:
710:
644:
604:
401:
256:
to electronically monitor over 140 radio markets in the U.S. The only other thing of note is that
171:
662:
466:
358:
328:
151:
627:
551:
213:
53:
513:
294:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
728:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
702:
398:
394:
195:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
537:
452:
432:
370:
314:
261:
234:
72:
64:
497:
272:
444:
203:
706:
624:
Every single billboard.biz link used as reference in that article is behind a paywall.
207:
674:
505:
478:
340:
290:
110:
533:
448:
428:
310:
253:
230:
419:
notability is clearly established in the aforementioned article. Just look at
665:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
469:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
361:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
331:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
260:
Based on all this, I think it's fair to say that yes, it's a national chart.
393:
notability is not demonstrated in the article. Not clear how it might meet
691:
http://www.billboard.com/#/charts/christian-songs?chartDate=2011-07-22
529:
443:
By the way, if it is not a notable chart then why do we have the
722:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
287:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
516:
106:
102:
98:
170:
643:
I'm having problems verifying these claims as well.--
368:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
672:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
476:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
338:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
184:
198:? I interpret the guideline's #5 point to mean a
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
736:). No further edits should be made to this page.
496:- Going out on a limb, I think it doesn't meet
8:
285:Note: This debate has been included in the
284:
705:, since Christian chart doesn't count.
581:WP:BAND 2 supports their inclusion. --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
229:not a specific chart is what I read!
689:I may have to revise my statement.
24:
202:chart, which I'm not sure that
1:
715:01:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
681:01:43, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
504:to have an article about it.
382:14:55, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
347:00:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
319:16:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
59:07:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
653:23:40, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
634:20:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
613:01:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
591:01:03, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
567:00:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
542:00:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
520:15:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
485:05:25, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
457:21:34, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
437:21:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
410:16:11, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
299:15:54, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
278:07:07, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
239:06:11, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
220:03:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
753:
725:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
580:
500:, maybe it's just
225:National chart is
48:The result was
683:
578:
487:
384:
349:
301:
276:
57:
744:
727:
677:
671:
667:
632:
630:
562:
555:
518:
511:
508:
481:
475:
471:
378:
373:
367:
363:
343:
337:
333:
270:
266:
227:Billboard charts
218:
216:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
73:Cloverton (band)
65:Cloverton (band)
56:
34:
752:
751:
747:
746:
745:
743:
742:
741:
740:
734:deletion review
723:
675:
660:
628:
625:
560:
553:
515:
509:
506:
479:
464:
445:Christian Songs
376:
371:
356:
341:
326:
262:
214:
211:
204:Christian Songs
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
750:
748:
739:
738:
718:
717:
695:
694:
686:
685:
684:
669:
668:
657:
656:
655:
637:
636:
618:
617:
616:
615:
594:
593:
583:Walter Görlitz
579:WP:MUSICBIO 11
572:
571:
570:
569:
544:
523:
522:
490:
489:
488:
473:
472:
461:
460:
459:
440:
439:
413:
412:
387:
386:
385:
365:
364:
353:
352:
351:
350:
335:
334:
323:
322:
321:
303:
302:
281:
280:
242:
241:
210:actually are.
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
749:
737:
735:
731:
726:
720:
719:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
697:
696:
692:
688:
687:
682:
679:
678:
670:
666:
664:
659:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
639:
638:
635:
631:
629:FreeRangeFrog
623:
620:
619:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
597:
596:
595:
592:
588:
584:
577:
574:
573:
568:
565:
564:
563:
557:
556:
548:
545:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
526:
525:
524:
521:
517:
514:
512:
503:
499:
495:
492:
491:
486:
483:
482:
474:
470:
468:
463:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
441:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
415:
414:
411:
407:
403:
400:
396:
392:
389:
388:
383:
380:
379:
374:
366:
362:
360:
355:
354:
348:
345:
344:
336:
332:
330:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
283:
282:
279:
274:
271:(note: not a
269:
267:
265:
259:
255:
251:
248:According to
247:
244:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
223:
222:
221:
217:
215:FreeRangeFrog
209:
208:Christian CHR
205:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
55:
54:Seraphimblade
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
724:
721:
698:
673:
661:
640:
621:
600:
575:
559:
552:
550:
546:
493:
477:
465:
424:
416:
390:
369:
357:
339:
327:
306:
264:I, Jethrobot
263:
257:
245:
199:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
421:WP:MUSICBIO
307:Weak delete
254:Nielsen BDS
158:free images
730:talk page
707:1292simon
561:Nidhiki05
547:Weak keep
425:Billboard
291:• Gene93k
250:Billboard
37:talk page
732:or in a
663:Relisted
645:RadioFan
605:RadioFan
502:too soon
467:Relisted
417:Big Keep
402:RadioFan
359:Relisted
329:Relisted
200:national
117:View log
39:or in a
703:WP:BAND
699:Delete.
676:MBisanz
641:Comment
622:Comment
601:Comment
494:Comment
480:MBisanz
399:WP:BAND
395:WP:BAND
377:polisme
342:MBisanz
196:WP:BAND
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
701:Fails
534:HotHat
530:K-LOVE
498:WP:GNG
449:HotHat
429:HotHat
391:Delete
311:Michig
231:HotHat
136:Google
94:delete
50:delete
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
711:talk
649:talk
609:talk
587:talk
576:Keep
538:talk
453:talk
433:talk
406:talk
372:Theo
315:talk
295:talk
246:Keep
235:talk
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
554:Toa
273:bot
206:or
186:TWL
115:– (
713:)
651:)
611:)
599:*
589:)
540:)
507:Mr
455:)
435:)
408:)
317:)
297:)
289:.
275:!)
237:)
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
52:.
709:(
647:(
626:§
607:(
585:(
536:(
510:T
451:(
431:(
404:(
313:(
293:(
233:(
212:§
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.